Smin1080p

Please submit a ticket to the support team: https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/categories/200005031-War-Thunder

We are unable to check this out on the forum.

No pre-order for this one, the 2 tank premiums or the other 2 premiums not yet shown officially.

We have had:

- Mirage when

- MiG-23 when

- Viggen when (enhance)

- Type 10 when

- Mirage when 2 - F.1 Boogaloo

- F-14 when

So the next chapter is waiting

Not this side of the major most likely.

New reports have been forwarded. Duplicates combined into the existing open report:

Store packs are frequently removed to not clog up the store with too many packs as Grom has explained before. We sometimes return them for GE for periods of time.

In the next major, it's planned to have a new version of Helicopter PvE for the lowest rank Helicopters that have no ATGMs / poor weponary, such as the AB205 and H-34s. So there will be 3 main versions of the mode BR wise.

Targets will be adjusted to suit their capabilities.

Developer response:

You can see all reports that have been forwarded here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/2197-dev-actioned-bug-reports/page/2/

With regards to the reports made on the Phantom, yes they have been forwarded. We cannot give an ETA on any changes until we know for sure when they are coming.

This particular one was an example that I'm aware the devs have from the CSIC and a defence study using publicly available sources. Its not viable for the devs to have to resource dump all the sources used within the construction of a weapon in game every time there is a challenge to it. The current report was already answered with the reasoning why its not changed thus far (conflicting information, lack of clarity on any constructional changes). Which is why we ask, if you think you have credible sources to challenge it please submit a report and then we can send them to the developers. Thus far, the current information has not been sufficient to A) Override all the currently known information on Magic 2 B) Prove any constructional changes that would suggest a jump from 35G to 50G.

This is known and why the devs are using public information. The issue here is most of it conflicts. So to reach the most reasonable outcome...

Nope. Its an example of a source that shows conflicting data on the 50G elements of Magic 2.

This was an example of a source that states the known improvement/differences between Magic 1 and 2. I'm not sure what your point is here when there is primary/secondary data on the Magic 1 for the IG values.

If you want to submit a report if you believe you have strong evidence of something, feel free. However we redirected from an explanation of why the Magic 2 is why it is to something I don't believe you have reported as being wrong yourself before on the Magic 1.

There are equally as many sources that claim 35G for the Magic 2, as well as books and sources written by those who worked at Matra, defence studies and others that have already been shared here and elsewhere on the forum. We are aware of the sources thus far that claim 50G, however its known that Magic 2 has a structural overload limit of 50G. Janes (or other similar encyclopaedic sources) however is not considered an authoritative source.

Based on the conflict of sources, known improvements and changes between Magic 1 and 2, there is nothing to currently suggest or reliably confirm Magic 2 was capable of pulling 50G in terms of its manauverabilty characteristics. Some sources conflict even with themselves, and others are suspected to be confusing data with the later MICA series.

We currently know the changes between Magic 1 and 2, and there simply is no clear evidence that anything changed with regards to such a...

Nobody is correct so far. Its going to be an interesting weekend

Maybe eliminate the things we have already clearly denied several times then

How many times have we denied a new nation / tree at this stage?

I'm not sure why you are tagging or trying to prove something to me. This article has nothing to do with me.

If you want to leave feedback feel free. But please don't tag me every time to disagree with something personally in your opinion.