Smin1080p

Im actually off today. So I had no idea what's been going on here today in the last few hours

You guys can sort yourselves out for one day right?

We have shown everything French (new vehicle wise) planned for this patch.

You are watching The Shooting Range – a weekly show for all tankers, airmen and Captains in War Thunder.

In this episode:

Pages of History: Surviving North of the Arctic Circle


Round Study: 105-mm Discarding Sabot Rounds


... and Metal beasts: The Most Versatile Focke-Wulf

We invite youtubers and streamers to cooperate and offer support depending on the quantity and popularity of your content. More information: https://warthunder.com/en/media/partnership/

None of this changes any of the standards of bug reporting and what we will accept. If its not on the specific model, it wont be accepted unless as @Einherjer1979said, sources proving the MF modification was the Warsaw pact one and the modifications are the same.

Sources on the ML and UB wont be accepted.

Even in this case, some modifications were worse than the M. So they would need to be very specific with the correct sourcing to prove which MF its talking about.

Regardless of how you wish to justify the modifications, sources need to be directly relevant to the variant in question. The rules are not open to personal interpretation.

The developers wont be accepting sources on the ML and UB for the M.

You will need to provide the correct sources that directly specify the variant we have.

This is the FAW.1 and not the 2.

We already said no new Swedish jets this update.

Whilst its BR is not fully final and could change, we will assess any required changes after seeing how the vehicle performs at its current BR.

This is too early to say at the time being. Future variants however may be possible.

Not currently planned.

Thank you for your report. This has been forwarded to the developers for review.

MiG-23 is still very much WiP and so far the bug reports submitted lack many sources and clarifications required. A lot of claims are not properly sourced.

Hi guys

Some feedback from the developers so far based on your comments:

- With regards to Japan, we understand the requests to see more domestic tanks and models in general for vehicles not yet in game. Unfortunately, the case for many more modern Japanese vehicles is that there is little information available and it takes some time to get it. We are indeed doing so, but in the meantime, do not want to leave Japan with nothing at all and not also work on some of the gaps it has. The presence of the M47 itself also slightly eases the situation with line-ups at the fifth

Leclerc S.1 and S.2 did not have commanders thermals.

Im aware of that, you have pinged me about 5 times over the last few weeks about it. Regardless, just like any other issue, it has its time and is in a queue. I cant speed that up, unless you have more info to add to it.

Too soon to tell at the moment. The mechanic itself is only just ready to be tested (as you can see).

The combined armour on a number of tanks of rank VI to VII have been switched to volumetric armour. As a result, the resistance of armour protection on some tanks may deviate from the correct values.

Nothing new to add.

If that turns out to be the case, then we will review it with the next BR pass. But nothings going to be changed without the evidence to show that's the case.

Yes

We don't plan to reduce them simply because they don't have Commander Thermals. They are still two of the top performing tanks in game.