Smin1080p

There is always a possibility for a second Dev server. However until it's basically confirmed for sure we can't say for certain.

Off topic removed again. Please do not ignore multiple warnings guys. Take it to the correct thread.

@EpicBlitzkrieg87
@Asghaad
@Einherjer1979
@The_Monolith
@[email protected]

Guys, this discussion can be taken to a more appropriate place. Its just off topic at this stage.

I'm referring to the report. Which contained one photo and one page from a book. Thats all:

Training bombs like this are not relevant or helpful to the devs in this case. It doesn't mean much at all.

Evidence would be needed, like in the case of the F-4F linking those US bombs to the French F-100. The F-4F was not given AIM-9Js because the USA had some in Germany. But because its manual, weapons manual and also clear photographic evidence showing them mounted was found.

Regardless, this isn't the subject of this topic. So i do

The German F-4F gets AIM-9J not just because it could, but because there are also 3 sources directing linking it to the missile. 1) Its manual 2) Its weapons manual 3) F-4F using AIM-9J in America:

We had 1 photo of a French F-100 with some bombs laid out in front and one page from a book to go on for this. Our consultants are trying to verify and gain more information as what was submitted was weak in terms of what we need to know to fully complete it. Its simply not enough as is.

Mystères IV simply never did, was never tested and so far, doesn't

The developers have this concern in mind for longer term future plans and possible additions.

The important thing that seems to be missed here is that this:

Does not compare to this in any way:

The F-4F getting missiles was clear instantly from its manual and photographic evidence. Taking also into consideration it lacks and will continue to lack many key aspects of the other Phantoms (FG.1 and FGR.2 included) which themselves will progressively get even better over time.

These require a whole new range of ordinance and a rework of more than 10 aircrafts presets. The developers are aware of this and as we communicated i

Regardless of whatever you wish to call them. There is in fact source material. The F-4F's manual and weaponry manual both confirm it could be used with the weapon along with well documented use of it in the USA by German F-4Fs and the FlakRakRad VT-1 upgrade program is also again backed up by the full proposal and development but was simply not adopted.

Meanwhile there is nothing at all for the Mystère IV and AS.20. The developers have said if anyone has any source that can show it was connected to / used by the aircraft, they would have no issues introducing the weapon.

VT-1 was a planned upgrade with proposals and sourced links for the FlakRakRad. On the flip side there is quite literally 0 source material we can use to link AS.20 with Mystère IV.

It was only ever even tested with AA.20 and not even a proposal for AS.20. If you can find some linked source material, then the developers would welcome it.

They could still be added if there is some form of source material linking the aircraft to the weapon. But so far there is nothing.

If you can provide such sources for the AS.20 and the Mystère IV, then we can disuses this further via a proper bug report. But until such time there is currently no material linking Mystère IV to AS.20. There is no double standards here. Simply that there is nothing for the developers to use material wise for AS.20 and Mystère IV.

According to current sources the devs have. Only AA.20 was ever used by, tested on or even linked the Mystère IV. There is no mention of AS.20 anywhere linked too it.

I remember saying it would have Nords. I don't recall confirming both. But stuff still isn't fully final yet anyway.

Only AA as far as I'm aware.

There are no more domestic hulls that have the same fully contained system like the Ito.

Regardless. This isn't the place to discuss suggestions

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/572-moderated-suggestions/

As we have said before, we aim to add that sort of functionality to all vehicles that had It over time. So it's just a case of time. Right now at this exact moment however it doesn't have it.

If reports were submitted on them, they likely just need time to be reviewed by the consults.

It doesn't currently so can't say for sure at this time.

We don't plan to postpone or change the Crotale at all for France or Sweden. The feedback from the majority of player is positive on the addition and we have no plans to downgrade the platform to a worse chassis that is no more domestic than the Ito is anyway.

A vocal minority hijacking a thread does not constitute a majority.

Not at the moment at least, but that could change.