Smin1080p

Inb4 the "MiG-23 confirmed!!". Remember that other swing wings exist. We didn't say it's that.

1947 is at the moment, the better performing tank. In several places, its armour is more effective in some spots and it has higher horizontal aiming speed.

Of the 3 variants in game, 1949 is doing the worst right now and the 1947 is better by a considerable margin. Its also a similar case with the STA-3 being after the Type 61.

There is no P-51A in game other than the exclusive Thunder League reward which will remain exclusive. We dont plan a P-51A right now.

All vehicles in game are modelled with their historical vertical targeting ranges. It is always based on the real life example grounded in proper source material.

If you believe its incorrect, its not down to justifications and reasonings. All that's needed to show its wrong is a source showing the current values are wrong. You can submit a historical report here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1952-ground-vehicles/

With regards to the Japanese tree, Rank V is always going to be a tricky spot to fill with more vehicles, generally because there is not that many at all that can viably be added and unfortunately we cant introduce a tree specific research boost / penalty.

There will be some changes very soon, one of which involves a vehicle you have mentioned here. This should help with the general progression flow of the tree, but if you did have further suggestions on what else to change, please feel free to post your feedback in that topic and share your further suggestions

https://fo

Hello

You had several complaints against you made in battle for remarks insulting people. Most were for this:

You also had several other complaints for similar offences, full caps in the chat at people during games in the past. This was not your first warning.

This is why you were chatbanned. As it is against the games Rules of Conduct: https://warthunder.com/en/community/gameRules/

3.2.2. Obscene or abusive language, words and phrases similar to them, written in any language, including transliteration.

3.2.7. Profanity and insult via

Not by removing the GR.1.

It will come in some form, but its undecided if it it will be an upgrade for the GR.1 or more likely a seperate aircraft entirely.

Today there was a BR update which we have every few months:

The German Churchill was one of the vehicles changed.

All vehicles in game are subject to Battle Rating changes. Not a single vehicle has a fixed BR, nor has any vehicle ever been sold or advertised with a fixed BR.

A refund is not possible, as there is no case for it. You purchased a vehicle. You were not sold it with a fixed BR and nor was any promise made that its BR cannot change. The dynamic BR system has been in game since 2014. All vehicles in game can have their

I think this is just a case of confusion.

We do pass suggestions and feedback from this topic, as it very often links directly to suggestions / bug reports etc.

The topic itself is not a suggestion, more a hub that directs to them.

Very soon. Devs have just been very busy.

G.91YS BR was a perfectly valid suggestion, just its best in the BR suggestion topics as thats where its all collected. As the recent changes showed, it was changed based on feedback there and will be 9.7 in the next update.

The changes you refer too with the skins for example is part of a larger solution and eventual fix to resolve the bug that has been persisting where similar vehicles or same vehicles in different nations show each others skins incorrectly. So yes, I think the Sim community in particular will be very grateful when that issue is fully resolved in due course as a result of this first step and thats also a prime reasons why datamining and assumptions are also not a great way to go about things.

You also assume that because those things were changed today, that took time away from othe

We don't use valid criticism to dismiss anything. Whats really being said in the posts I responded to, is misleading, out of context claims that are incorrect and don't reflect the overall puicture. They are also personal opinions on subjects not related to this topic at all and best kept out of it to keep this on topic.

What you assume to be "easy" changes dont often translate into easy and quick to do in an already very busy landscape. Again, suggestions come from all corners. This topic is one and there are countless.

Nobody was calling out passion or conc

If this was backed up by enough evidence to prove this is the case, then it would indeed be forwarded and have a high chance of being resolved in the future. Model corrections take time (particularly on older models) but are generally always dealt with once enough information and evidence has been located to solidify the change.

Changes dont always need a big amount to be done. Its also the same with feedback. Celere Sahariano is a good example of that. In the grand scheme of things, it was not a massively requested tank from the whole community at all. Even among Italia

You yourself have acknowledged that's not the case in examples where results have happened and using a singular example of a specific situation does not apply to all im afraid.

This sort of response is the sort of thing that does make us take a topic far less seriously however, as it goes from constructivity to accusations and false claims. So I would recommend we dont go further down that road here and ruin this topic.

You have also not been told in the past anything like that for feedback in general. So please do not misuse and twist my words out of context.

Fun fact, It was me that suggested the Chinese air tree in 2014 ))

I was a moderator at the time.

I think you are misinterpreting. Statistics don't lie in the fact that they show 100% the factual data as it is without bias or personal opinion interfering.

That does not automatically mean however, they are 100% the only thing or the right thing to be used in 100% of cases. There is and will always be other factors, such as feedback involved.

Not at all. Stats themselves do not lie. They show things exactly as they are in the most factual way possible. But that does not mean 0 feedback is taken into account and that the stats are 100% the correct decision to make in every instance.

Nobody said the statistics are always 100% correct, which is why we post them as proposed changes and feedback is absolutely taken into account. Thats exactly why the German M48 and T-44-100 are no longer going down in BR, as well as additional changes were added such as J32 Lansen, G.91YS, Jaguar GR.1 and Radkampfwagon to name a few.

Yes, we discussed this several days ago. Its in queue to be reviewed by a Technical moderator. It will be dealt with, when it can.