No news for now.
No news for now.
We have made no such announcement.
There are many vehciles that could be added by swapping hulls / turrets in various combinations. It's not however relivant or planned for this update however
Historical reprorts and their investigations are not necessarily tied to major updates or content additions. They are independent mostly.
We don't have any news to share in that area right now.
Equally at the same time there are plenty of people asking us to focus more on QoLs. So whilst this is a "small brush aside Dev blog" to you, to others its not really.
Plenty of people always ask why we don't do majors with no vehciles and just QoL. We don't need to do that because different teams work on different things. But it just goes to show that even when we do cover some pretty significant QoL changes (believe me this is no "small brush aside" matter. It's a huge amount of background rework) we go right back to "when vehciles?"
Blogs will come as they are ready and planned too. There is always a chance. But we are not going to do this question every day whenever there is an early blog.
As the blog mentions, we will talk about future chnages and what that means when it's ready.
Oh man....
Everyone with paint is now an expert leaker.
I know we are between Dev blogs guys, but can we not resort to posting this sort of stuff just to survive the day pretty please?
We generally always have some model updates now and then. USSR and Germany have received more updates as their vehciles are some of the oldest in game (certainly tank wise).
But right now we don't have any news to share spesifcally on the next patch in this regard.
Oh damn your right. Also "The spreadsheet says the update/blogs/teaser is late therefor they must have delayed" is another.
It's actually quite calm so far.
But ofc we have had:
- obligatory off topic missile talk
- random nation discussion
- "I don't care about this vehcile, therefore nobody does and I speak for everyone"
However still looking forward too:
- [insert nation here] suffers
- OmG a BoaTe
- SeCoNd BloG toDaY? tHiS dIDnt CoUnT
A High Definition version that's still a fake. Thanks for upgrading the resolution)))
It's even more funny for us sometimes to see just how far off some of them can be ))
They are just random wishlists sprinkled with a Q&A answer or the one blog thats actually been released.
I love the low quality mobile photo of a discord (not a screenshot) for the extra "authenticity" )))
These guys really be trying hard.
Its extremely very fake.
Im not really sure why we are back on missile thunder again, but as a reminder guys, this section (and the topics within it) exist to discuss this:
https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/29-aircraft-discussion/
Not sure where that comes from, even on the wiki its correct:
Perhaps google hasn't updated recently.
The EJ Kai is 11.7.
Hello
ATGM carriers follow their historical limits. If you believe this is incorrect for this vehicle and have sources to support this, please submit a report: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder
Not really. I'm just clarifying what context the comment were in as you were crossing two different ones. We haven't said anything about the ADV other than what BVV said (we are working on it and a British top fighter is a high priority).
But Italy's planned priority top fighter was the F-16.
Just to add further clarifications, these responses were regarding the British ADV as you can see by the comments.
We are looking into options. But again, as I mentioned, one of the main reasons the CBR was created is due to the forum system being too restrictive/strict/hard to do according to feedback we had.
If the report has a high number of upvotes, it does become more visible to us to find and forward.
We don't plan this. That would be too open for manipulation by certain groups/discords within the community to simply push or downvote what they see as a "major issue" without being a true reflection of what actually is or is considered to be one by the developers.
Again, that's enough off topic here. This isn't a bug reporting topic.