Smin1080p

Stay tuned to the news. This is just a teaser for now

Stay tuned for offical news and announcements. This is just a teaser.

Given the MiG-29 was added last update and we just teased another Soviet jet, I would lower expectations about yet another being inside this patch.

141 is correct for Soviet also. It was changed later on, not just internationally.

Water?

Ah yes, such a high quality leak that they had to take it on a low quality mobile camera. /s

It keeps getting better )))

A reminder guys, this is the next major rumor roundup. Not shell / tank / aircraft missile discussion. Please take it to the correct sections.

A bug was fixed with this issue today internally and should be available in a future patch.

Previously artillery units had a detection radius of 2.5 km, which means they could only be detected when players approached this distance. This parameter was set before, but apparently it did not work as intended.

We decided to remove stealth from units completely.

If you are requesting a status update of a particular issue, its better to simply PM any Technical Moderator or myself. As well as most importantly including a link to the report(s) if it has been reported several times already. This way, we can see its history faster.

This is an unofficial poll and nothing to do with us. We are aware of peoples desires to see missiles for a lot of different aircraft. Sadly its not just about popularity.

Yes.

In all of those cases, it's because there were grounds (documents, plans etc) to do so.

Spitfire PR XIXs were never at any point armed. They were a variant spesifcally and purposefully not armed by design purely to be photo reconnaissance aircraft. Which is exactly what Sweden purchsed them for.

There are no grounds or basis to provide Sweden with a Spitfire PR XIX with weponary it never at any point had when there are other aircraft that could be considered both for Sweden and now Finland which is part of their tree.

I'm not sure what relivance this has to the next major update discussion and as someone has already linked you our previous answer on this in the last BR pass, there is no need for further off topic here.

Feel free to leave feedback in the Dev server section when the vehcile becomes available for testing if it's not a model "issue" but just a suggestion.

Please do not spam tag us with demands.

If you want to make an official suggestion, feel free. There is nothing of substance here that has not already been answered.

It's too soon to talk about what we have / haven't seen yet.

Don't believe it's intentionally done, so please submit a report and we can check it out

Thank you, my first spin out in it

Any reports submitted will be reviewed when it becomes available for testing.