We dont have any plans for the moment at least to run another test (in the short term). Most EC maps were added to RB at the higher ranks.
We dont have any plans for the moment at least to run another test (in the short term). Most EC maps were added to RB at the higher ranks.
It's the German F-4F. As Flame explained, they had to have US markings when in the US for training initially. Here's the same airframe back In Germany a few years later:
The event Tornado will not receive GBUs. This was a balance decision by the developers that also allows it to have a lower BR. Regardless of the fact it's possible for other Tornado variants to carry them. It was clear from the blog that this variant would not have GBUs.
Also has nothing to do with this topic. Please take wishlisting to the correct place.
We don't need another multi page nation discussion like the last thread before we posted a single blog.
Pretty sure he just said it wasn't planned (at the time) to be premium. But it was never added or announced. So subject to change.
We never said it was planned to come at all
Plus, I really don't wanna have to do this so early in the season:
On a serious note however, if / when we have a vehicle to show and talk about, we will make it clear where its going. But we are not going to talk / confirm anything about vehicles not yet fully confirmed and found only in files.
We have already posted a response in this topic a few weeks ago as to why the F-4F is not planned to receive AIM-9L. The developers response has not changed.
The skins are actually done and have been in the game the whole time. It's actually a coding matter that stops them from showing. So it needs a bit of a deeper look.
We don't have any evidence it was ever done currently. Concept artwork is not useable in this situation.
This would be correct for this report. Missiles often have to be configured a certain way to achieve certain performance factors in game.
AIM-7F is configured to reach 3.3/9.5nm when launched into the rear hemisphere under conditions corresponding to these diagrams:
Dear Players!
With the start of a new year, its often good to reflect on the previous year. As you may remember, with the start of every year, we announce the recipients of the Active Bug Reporter program, in which we thank those users who have contributed towards improving the game, by submitting a number of high quality bug reports throughout the year or by particular assistance in any given historical reporting area.
Firstly, we are very happy to announce that from last years program we have welcomed fully onto the Technical Moderation team a previous recipient from 2021:
@VonarianTheGreat
We are also pleased to announce the recipients of the Active Bug Reporter rewards program for 2022:
@Gunjob
@Very_merry_Jerry
@DirectSupport
@Ghostmaxi
@TrotylYu
@_____HK416...
Read moreIf something is believed to be over / under performing in some way and evidence that meets the criteria has been gathered, then a report should be made for the Devs to review.
Discussion topics are not the way to go about reporting an issue if you believe it is one.
Please do not spam create multiple topics. Your previous topic was answered.
If you wish to discuss the aircraft, please use existing topics:
I would also invite you to read and familiarise yourself with the forum rules:
Specifically:
If you believe something is wrong in game and have evidence to prove that, please make a bug report here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder
Spamming multiple topics is not going to get an issue fixed. Please consider this a final warning not to spam create topics on the same subject.
If you would like to see a fix for something, please make a report.
Any content shown from test servers / pre-release is always subject to change and never to be considered final. Within our blog for the Marineflieger Tornado, we made it very clear that these were anti-ship weapons and made no mentions, advertisement or made any offical videos showing an air to ground radar.
Content creators and anyone on Youtube for that matter is free to make whatever content they wish. Some creators show things ahead of their offical release and often before they are fully final by various methods. Again however, if its not something we have confirmed or shown ourselves, then it should not be considered final or a feature of the aircraft.
I wouldnt honestly put it past someone here to be that person, just to try and report it to us using that as a source
I too also wanted and decided to buy my own Tornado. Mine was just a bit smaller:
Its actually just a Tornado that someone straight up purchased for themselves and stuck a bunch of replica missiles on: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/man-who-owns-real-life-14576978
Its at Swansea airport for all to see.
The missiles are quite literally just slapped on:
The report by Godvana was a suggestion to add the Kormoran 2. Not a bug report on the performance.
Any issues or performance related matters of the existing Kormoran 1 should be reported seperatly as it's 1 issue per topic.
We can pass properly submitted reports with evidence showing something missing, if that's the case, onto the developers yes.
As your original question has been answered, please use existing topics to discuss matters already open in the community: