Smin1080p

Hello

Multiple other 10.7 tanks were also increased to 11.0, including the T-80U, T-80UK, T-72B3, Leopard 2PL, M1A1 HC, M1A1 AIM, Challenger 2 and also several other lighter vehicles. The changes were across all nations as a wider step to increase the top ceiling of the BRs. These tanks will face the same opponents they already did before, with the exception of the weaker 9.7s.

As we mentioned already in the response you highlighted, changes to improve the Ariete are planned for the next major. We will follow the stats of all vehicles at the top end and make any required changes in the next BR update.

Lots of feedback was included in this update, with the 11.3 expansion itself as well as many other changes all coming from feedback. Unfortunately not every piece of feedback can be implemented as desired.

As we explained:

Other MBTs won't get a "buff". This was referring to the BR increase that most top tier tanks saw. The increase for effectiveness is just the Ariete in a future patch.

It's not an official poll. It's community made.

Hi guys

An Update from the developers.

We don’t plan to adjust Battle Ratings for some of the requested vehicles such as, for example, 2S38 or BMP-2M. Due to the general revisiting of the upper limits of BRs, and further possible adjustments by their combat efficiency, massively reported vehicles (2S38, BMP-2M, CV90105, etc.) will be thoroughly monitored before the next session of BR corrections. Also, we don’t plan to revoke the BR adjustments for the Ariete MBT family, however certain improvements of their combat efficiency are expected in the upcoming game major update. Their increase in BR however (along with the rest of other nations top ranks) means they will still face all the same opponents as generally most things have been increased along that end of the BRs, just not the weaker 9.7 tanks they did before.

With regards to the F-14A, we also plan to keep a close eye on it a...

Up to a month was generally what we had on the forum. As I said, its not always possible to uphold that on the CBR platform, so if something has been up longer than that, contact a mod.

Hello

The issue was fixed but seemingly returned. We have made the devs aware.

More reports are being forwarded than ever before. As I said, simply make a report and if you don't get a response within the standard timeframe, let one of us know.

First report already has a developer response:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Oq31E1VKP7V8

Second report was not a bug, but a suggestion and was already forwarded on the RU forum:

https://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/328124-223018-otsutstvie-osnovnogo-rezhima-zakhvata-tseli-po-fotokontrastu-v-zkr-strela-10m2/

Third report is also not a bug. It has tracking radar, and it works as any other tracking radar in the game. As for "Passive Direction Finder" (пассивный радиопеленгатор), we don't have such mechanics in game. So it's a feature request, but not a bug.

No updates currently.

Please submit a report and pass me the link.

The site works correctly, there is simply a high number of spam / non reports.

Thanks for you feedback everyone. We have now passed all comments onto the developers for them to check out

Every effort is generally taken to explain why (where possible) a change cannot / can be made in certain situations where its discussed a lot. Unfortunately we cant answer every single BR suggestion and Thunderskills existence is not a reason to provide our own internal (actual) stats. Its existed for the history of the game over the past 10 years and will continue to exist.

We have a huge array of staff and skills throughout the whole company across many teams. I cannot answer specifically as to every single employee / position we have individually company wide. However all bases are covered.

That would be taking my response out of context and also adding things I never said at all.

If you check what it was I was responding to, then its explained.

The question was why the Tornado (Not F-4F) cant have Mavericks (when so far, no primary documentation confirms it to be the case as the only things that do are Janes / 3rd party level magazines) when another Russian tank can have a shell that supposedly did / did not have a feature it has (which is under investigation). One has been reported and under investigation whilst the other has no real evidence supporting it.

For starters, they are two entirely differently matters, each with their own context, stages of reporting / investigation etc. Secondly, neither has anything to do with this subject.

You will notice nowhere in my response did I say things cannot be discussed. I actually just sai...

These are entirely seperate cases with (I'm sure) there own situations.

If you want to link me the reports (in a more appropriate forum topic, not here) then I can check them out.

However whatever situation that issue has, doesn't change the facts about Tornado Mavericks.

There isn't any real evidence that's been provided for Tornado Mavericks so far. Just a couple of Jane's and magazines claiming it was possible. However no photo exists and it's not found in any primary documentation so far that we have.

No real relivance to the topic at this stage. The Devs look at many aspects, not just what you claim.

Except it isn't a fact. It's something a group of people claimed to have done. It doesn't make it a fact. Again, we explained this at the time.

We are not going to provide those statistics just because Thunderskill exists. Again, we don't provide those stats for reasons previously explained.

I believe I've answered these questions several times now and the topic appears to be going in criciles.

Again, your free to use TS for your personal use. The bottom line is please don't use it with the expectation it will be taken into account with feedback or receive an answer on something. As it's not accurate.

It's very clear you disagree with this and you have stated ...

As with all issues, it needs to be verified and confirmed by the Devs before a fix takes place.

You can provide your own personal thoughts and suggestions in your own feedback. Which is taken into account and as evidenced by the current changes, can result in revisions.

As I clarified above however, Thunderskill won't be considered a valid means however as it's stats are Inaccurate. The Devs will compare feedback to the actual data and make decisions based on that.

It's a reported issue.