Smin1080p

Where you found it is irrelevant. If you can't prove it's legally declassified and not restricted in any way, then it can't be used, shared or posted.

If you think there is an issue, please submit a report.

Guys, I'm going to say this very clearly for everyone.

If you cannot definitively prove something is legally publicly available, fully declassified and without any restrictions, do not post it at all.

No ifs, buts or it "maybes". If you cannot prove it, Don't do it at all. Your personal opinion on what you think it is will not be used or taken into consideration. If you cannot provide proof, it will be removed.

We will begin issuing account punishments of a serious level if anyone chooses to further ignore this warning. This is not a matter to simply be taken lightly and if people continue treating it as such they will lose access to the forum and potentially accounts entirely.

Not only can we not use such material, will not handle it in any way, you also risk only yourselves.

Take this as final warning.

Do Not
post any source material without proof of it's declassification, full public availability and ensure it has no restrictions.

"It's on the internet" is NOT proof.

Yep. The config changes were not finished from the version which was datamined. But the developers have confirmed that in a later build, its already been corrected.

Should be fixed in a later version. But it doesn't have 105s.

Not sure where this is coming from, but as far as I can see, both the ASSTA.1 and MFG both will have the 103:

Fixed in a future update.

Off topic removed. Please stay on topic guys

The warhead weight is not equal to the explosive mass. The actual explosive mass inside the warhead itself is 56kg.

As always, if you suspect any weapon is not performing as it should, please submit a report with your sources: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

Please do keep in mind however, wikipedias are not a valid source.

If incorrect, this would need to be properly reported in order to be passed to the Devs to be fixed.

Guys there are more appropriate topics to be discussing this aircraft, this isn't the place:

What reports specifically are we referring too here please? Its very unlikely to come that quickly even so.

Datamined information cant be used in reports for the very reason that it can often appear wrong because its being interpreted wrong. Certain values have to sometimes be coded in particular ways to achieve certain in game outcomes. This is why values can often appear incorrect and why we don't allow reports from datamining, because the values there often are not a reflect of the real in game ones or people have misinterpreted them entirely.

Even if it is the case that the values are wrong leading to an issue, datamines cannot be used for reporting. This criteria has been set by the developers for a reason and has been made clear many times now. Reports must use in game tests or the visible values the game provides.

If this is the case, then there is no reason to be discussing it further at this time until there is a final outcome

Its down to the developers to make that decision. Its not simply a case of your method of calculating shows it may be wrong, therefor it is.

Your welcome to submit reports with material to support your claims for consideration.

This has already been correctly reported via appropriate means and known to the developers: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XTvLIGEyhF2F

Its being investigated.

As we have already confirmed multiple times now, Marineflieger Tornados did not use GBUs and we do not plan to introduce them for this variant regardless of its compatibility with other IDS variants / services in order to retain its lower BR.

This aircraft will not receive GBUs.

Client data (datamines) cant be used for reports. All the visible information in game (stat cards, in game testing) can be used.

Thank you to everyone who applied. We have now closed applications.

Successful applicants have now been contacted.

The following users have been selected / offered Technical Moderator positions.

Gunjob


Magiaconatus


Metrallaroja


Very_merry_Jerry


InterFleet

I wouldn't say never ever, but at least for the time being there has been a bit of a break yes.

It's possible it will return in the future.