Smin1080p

Added based on European use on the G and Turkish use (AIM-9P) in the S. There is no limitatiin there. Italy also had no other top tier at the time.

Again, I'm not sure what the relivance if this question is given what we have already explained in the Tornado. It's not going to change things going "but what about XYZ?"

Again, it is being considered and at no point has it been said it has not. But it's not conclusive and not clear. So it has not been added. If further information can be found, then it may be a stronger case.

We have direct evidence the F-5A (and thus C) could be retrofitted and there is plenty of photos of the whole F-5 family using that.

If you can provide any further evidence of any Tornado variants mounting Paveways on those bombs, then it would be comparable.

The manual directly lists it being possible and there is also photographic evidence of them using it in training on the F-4F.

There's currently no photos of the Tornados mounting bombs there even in trails, training and testing.

As I have said already, it's still being considered, but whataboutism is not going to change the Devs minds. Further evidence is more likely too.

The report only based that off the manual indicating it may be technically possible. We dont have enough evidence to fully confirm it yet. Unless more can be found. So it's still being reviewed.

It's being considered but it's not a clear as you make out. The manual only indicates it may be possible without fully confirming it. It's also not supported in any other documents or photos for any of the Tornado variants.

So whilst it is being considered, what has been submitted so far is not conclusive and is based only on the theoretical possibility.

2 x GBU-16 or 1 x GBU-24 on all 3 main tree variants (UK, GER, ITA) currently. The IDS Marineflieger does not have access to them.

The developers have provided the following response:

They have therefor decided to remain using the figures provided in the manual as this would superspeed any marketing material by Panavia:

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

The model is now complete for it, but its functionality has not yet been finalized. If we get some more details, we will keep you updated

HARM and all forms of anti-radiation are not something we have in game currently.

The wing speed was corrected based on the information in this report:

Mistake in the blog text. Its been corrected.

As we have already mentioned, the Marineflieger IDS will be the only Tornado and only aircraft in game to have any form of Anti-Ship missile for now. There are existing aircraft in game already that could carry Anti-Ship weapons, but we don't have that in game currently. So for the time being it will remain just with the Marineflieger IDS.

Regarding AGM-65, we don't have any details or evidence of its use with any of the Tornado family.

Export Drakens from the F onwards could be fitted with them. The J is no longer coming as the premium as grom has already said. The XS is the premium.

The D variant never had them and was never part of the family of Drakens that were fitted with them.

There are not any plans with this major that we can say at least.

We are also generally always forwarding feedback from the SB community (as well as all communities) onto the devs

At the moment, its too soon to really go into more depth about the AS.34. However I'm sure it will be demonstrated on offical streams or when it becomes available for content creators.

With the patch.

Currently no, however the report remains open, so it may be added in the future. At the moment it has the 60 standard CMs.

I never mentioned that the aircraft was being treated as an attacker so the second question really doesn't have any relevance. Again, a vehicles efficiency is decided based on how each individual one performs. The fact there may be the same / similar in another tree is irrelevant when it comes to how the vehicle itself individually is performing and where it falls.

Anything is a possibility for the future, but for now there are no direct plans to talk about.