devtrackers.gg
Hey, we forwarded the issue to the devs, they're looking at it right now.
Hey, we forwarded the issue to the devs, they're looking at it right now.
The protection parameters of the US and Soviet main battle tanks have been changed (open chart).
Changes to protection parameters of the American and Soviet MBTs:
In the recently published changelog for the “Raining Fire” update, a few mistakes were made in the protection parameters of Soviet MBTs, while those parameters in the game were mostly set correctly. We have corrected these issues, and now present the latest protection values. In addition, the protection parameters on the M1 Abrams series of tanks have been adjusted.
For turrets of Soviet MBT’s, the protection values in the sector of course angles ± 30° from the vehicle axis are used; this means that when a tank gets hit from these angles, protection is provided at a minimum as indicated. In the case of hitti...
Od 16 września do 30 września
Zniżki dla Graczy Playstation 4, dodatkowa zniżka dla subskrybentów PlayStation Plus!
25% Zniżki (50% z PlayStation®Plus)
AH-1S Cobra -25% / -50% z PS Plus
JASDF Sabre -25% / -50% z PS Plus
PG 02 -25% / -50% z PS Plus
M4A4 Sherman -25% / -50% z PS Plus
Shenyang F-5 -25% / -50% z PS Plus
Typ 74 Mod G/Kai -25% / -50% z PS Plus
Zestaw Startowy USA -25% / -50% z PS Plus
Zestaw Startowy ZSRR -25% / -50% z PS Plus
Japońska Kampania Pacyficzna (1941-1943) -25% / -50% z PS Plus
15% Zniżki (30% z PlayStation®Plus)
A129 Ma...
Read moreThe protection parameters of the US and Soviet main battle tanks have been changed (open chart).
Changes to protection parameters of the American and Soviet MBTs:
In the recently published changelog for the “Raining Fire” update, a few mistakes were made in the protection parameters of Soviet MBTs, while those parameters in the game were mostly set correctly. We have corrected these issues, and now present the latest protection values. In addition, the protection parameters on the M1 Abrams series of tanks have been adjusted.
For turrets of Soviet MBT’s, the protection values in the sector of course angles ± 30° from the vehicle axis are used; this means that when a tank gets hit from these angles, protection is provided at a minimum as indicated. In the case of hitti...
Once again, this was the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the battle that ended in a victory for the RAF. Not Germany. Germany did indeed partake and that's why they are in the Battle of Britain events going on as part of this event. So they are very much included.
It's also worth pointing out that almost every event we have includes a German reward vehicle of some kind, so Germany has had more than it's fair share.
There was only ever going to be 1 reward vehicle for this event so it made 100 percent sense to be a British example. We cannot simply make multiple reward vehicles for every event all the time. We often have smaller events with a single reward. We have had multiple events this year with lots of rewards.
As for the decal, what's ugly to you is not to others. Lots of people like it and have reacted very well to it. Nobody is forcing you to use it if you don't wis...
Read moreHi!
This issue should be resolved now.
Thanks!
None of this changes what I said. All of them are interesting machines that players were happy to see.
As I said, not every event vehicle is production and not every event vehicle is prototype. They are a mix of both with the main goal of being interesting.
As per the terms on the event article:
The vehicle was not even released. It was given to content creators early to create videos to show the vehicles. At no point is a repair cost ever "final".
Not all event vehicles are production vehicles. There are already also prototypes and experimental vehicles too. At the same time, its worth noting, not all players want prototypes and obscure / unknown that they know nothing about. The general response and feedback on the F-11 and Ar-196 when we announced them was largely positive.
Squadron vehicles are also getting a regular supply of vehicles.
Im not sure after several attempts over the last week or so and responses of me saying that we cant answer anything yet, people still try
This has quite literally nothing to do with the topic. Picking a vehicle and asking if its coming is wishlisting.
Production numbers are not the only factor. Event vehicles also cover unique and interesting examples as well. Event vehicles have to be interesting, otherwise people are not interested.
6 people have voted on this.
We cannot reasonably implement or consider every vehicle after 6 people request them.
The topic as a whole is mostly suggesting aircraft that have already been suggested previously and answered before.
Again, its not to say that wont come. But its unreasonable to expect all of these aircraft, particularly many that most people dont even know about / ask about to come soon.
T-14 and T-90MS were not created to counter the leopoard 2A5 and M1A2 Abrams but were in fact contemporaries to much later variants of both of those series of tanks.
Right now, we have no plans at all for the T-14 in any conceivable close future and the T-90MS is also not in any very close plans.
Firstly, im not a developer, but a Community Manager.
Secondly, ive responded several times on the subject of all of the aircraft you have mentioned and other similar ones very clearly that whilst we dont have any current / immediate plans for them, we also dont exclude the possibility of adding them in the future.
Thats not really what was said in the post. More a direct claim that we are somehow making less tech tree vehicles whilst also increasing the number of premiums. Which is not accurate at all.
Regardless, F-11 is not really an "iconic" aircraft and it was only in service for a short window with limited numbers. The US tree is hardly short of jet aircraft and there are many more still to come in the future head for both the USAF and USN.
It never had bombs. Its the Hurricane Mk I/L in Fleet Air Arm service. The FAA also contributed to the battle and the Hurricane Mk I was the highest scoring aircraft on the RAF side that bore the brunt of the fighting.
No bug report has ever taken years to approve on this forum. Some reports, during heavy major update periods can take a month. But usually its around a week or so depending on the availability of Technical Moderators, testing periods and update periods. Baring in mind all Technical Moderators are both players themselves and volunteers.
In 2018 we had 47 premiums added in updates. In 2019 we had 41 premiums in updates. So far in 2020, we have had 25 premiums.
In 2018 we had 203 tech tree vehicles in updates. In 2019 we had 223 tech tree vehicles in updates. So far in 2020, we have had 143 tech tree vehicles with 2 major updates still to go.
Please do not mislead people with incorrect claims.
Good things do indeed come to those who wait, but what im saying is, please stop going off topic discussing aircraft / tanks that have had 0 official confirmation, leaks or any kind of proper rumor at all. Wishlisting and hypothetical guessing are not rumors.
We have a whole forum with plenty of places to discuss MiG-23, Puma and the myriad of other vehicles that keep coming up.
As per my earlier post, this change does not reflect a change in the implementation of vehicles. Only the suggestions being accepted and passed for consideration.