Battlefield V Dev Tracker

Your post/comment has been removed:

• Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed. These are often removed without notice and not allowed on the same day that patch announcements/notes are posted.

Your post was removed based on the current rules as set forth by the subscribers of the sub:

(removed if)

• Less than 100 upvotes in an hour

• Less than 200 upvotes in 2 hours

• Less than 300 upvotes in 3 hours

• Less than 400 upvotes at any time after 4 hours

• Less than 40 comments at any time after 4 hours

Your post/comment has been removed:

• Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed. These are often removed without notice and not allowed on the same day that patch announcements/notes are posted.

Your post was removed based on the current rules as set forth by the subscribers of the sub:

(removed if)

• Less than 100 upvotes in an hour

• Less than 200 upvotes in 2 hours

• Less than 300 upvotes in 3 hours

• Less than 400 upvotes at any time after 4 hours

• Less than 40 comments at any time after 4 hours

Your post/comment has been removed:

• Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed. These are often removed without notice and not allowed on the same day that patch announcements/notes are posted.

Your post was removed based on the current rules as set forth by the subscribers of the sub:

(removed if)

• Less than 100 upvotes in an hour

• Less than 200 upvotes in 2 hours

• Less than 300 upvotes in 3 hours

• Less than 400 upvotes at any time after 4 hours

• Less than 40 comments at any time after 4 hours

I agree 100%. Generalizations are weak and, to be frank, a bit lazy. Clumping everyone together isn’t accurate - everyone has their own opinions and situations - even if many agree on one thing, it’s not everyone (as that tweet reads). That is one of the reasons I unliked it.

It’s not being ignored. There’s meetings on Monday regarding the recent changes and steps going forward. I don’t have any further details at this time - but the feedback received has been noticed and acknowledged by the studio. We’ll have more info next week, hopefully.

Allow me to clarify. I wasn’t saying that it’s silly to apologize for the offense. And I truly am sincere in my apology.

We’re in an incredibly connected time because of social media and people look for “gotcha” opportunities. A misspoken tweet, an ill-advised like or RT is now considered gospel and used as evidence of the entire thought process of someone - rather than having a conversation about said tweet. That, to me, is silly. But it is where we are. And I do apologize.

And I’m owning the fact that it was I’ll-advised to like that tweet - I should’ve looked at it as a whole rather than the message it was trying to convey. Had I done that thoroughly, I wouldn’t have liked the tweet.

Maybe go look at my comment on that thread.

I did like the tweet when I first saw it in my feed (which I’m sure you can imagine is quite full). Not a huge fan of the tone and words used, but I saw the bigger message. (And then I unliked it because of that last part.)

The part that struck me is about the fact that it’s impossible to make everyone happy about changes -

There’s always going to be someone (or many folks) that completely agree with your direction, and just as many that don’t. And that’s the crux of the issue - make everyone a little unhappy with a middle-ground compromise or piss off a section of the community but make another section happy? (And please note, one section of the community doesn’t “speak for the community”. Half the folks that play games don’t even use Reddit, Twitter, or Forums.)

This isn’t in anyway an attempt to diminish the importance of the feedback from one section or another - at all. The Devs have to balance the feedback with actual hard data that shows more than gu...

Alright, this one has gotten a bit toxic and out of hand. It will remain up, but locking comments.

Your post/comment has been removed:

• Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed. These are often removed without notice and not allowed on the same day that patch announcements/notes are posted.

Your post was removed based on the current rules as set forth by the subscribers of the sub:

(removed if)

• Less than 100 upvotes in an hour

• Less than 200 upvotes in 2 hours

• Less than 300 upvotes in 3 hours

• Less than 400 upvotes at any time after 4 hours

• Less than 40 comments at any time after 4 hours

Your post/comment has been removed:

• Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed. These are often removed without notice and not allowed on the same day that patch announcements/notes are posted.

Your post was removed based on the current rules as set forth by the subscribers of the sub:

(removed if)

• Less than 100 upvotes in an hour

• Less than 200 upvotes in 2 hours

• Less than 300 upvotes in 3 hours

• Less than 400 upvotes at any time after 4 hours

• Less than 40 comments at any time after 4 hours

Your post/comment has been removed:

Keep it civil.

• Posts must be directly related to Battlefield V.

• Do not personally attack other users, and do not "name and shame" specific users or servers without sufficient evidence backing up your claim. This includes refraining from posting personal information of others. Reddit isn't your personal army.

• Do not post inappropriate language, including but not limited to sex, race, and religion.

Yes, the only things that don’t track are Chapter XP and ToW progression.

Totally understand and agree. I have a lot of thoughts on what should/shouldn’t be allowed on Password Protected servers based on feedback from Competitive gamers and content creators over the past few months. And we’re sharing this feedback with the team.

You earn Soldier XP and Weapon progression unless the server is password protected.

What modes currently support 48 player count? (This isn’t me being sassy, I promise.) Mutators are something Adam and I know the community want. (And something I’m pushing for with the continued development after the New Year.)

Definitely something I’m recommending.

I understand. We have a meeting going on Monday morning to talk about the progression feedback we’ve seen (and Adam and I knew this was going to be a thorn in folks’ side.) We’ve taken some suggestions - half-XP, standard settings, etc as examples of what the team could do regarding ToW XP/Chapter XP, and are writing a report for that meeting to see what can be shifted/changed.

Your post/comment has been removed:

Please follow the subreddit's rules.

Correct. That meme was removed as per the rules of the sub and he reposted it.

He's not very bright either to be honest