Magic The Gathering: Arena Dev Tracker

@RandyB#75193:

@Volkbrecht#63244:

@WotC_Lexie:

Well, it's called a job. If it would be fun, you wouldn't get payed to do it ;)

My job is fun. Lots of jobs are fun. They become less fun when people go out of their way to make them less fun, so let's just not do that.

I absolutely love my job, and it is a ton of fun! It is even more fun when people are nice and follow the rules. :slightly_smiling_face:

@SeriousPaul#78974:

@WotC_Lexie:

@SeriousPaul#78974:

Since I'll never give up, this will indeed be along thread. I especially will not give up because of childish insults, or because someone makes an offhand snarky remark online.


As such each day I will post until they see that this is a good idea.

That's not cool, friend. Please don't do that.

Why? I mean I am not trying to be defiant, but I have a goal and no one is required to post or read my threads. As such I fail to see how it would violate any ToS. If it does, let me know so I can A. Stop posting, and B find some place else to take my free time and business to.

I am required to read your posts. Spamming through repeated posts/flooding forums is against our ...

@mort-aux-rois#74105:

@WotC_Lexie:

@Sirius:

@MTG Arena Admin:

It's a difficult problem to tackle, but to do so, we're changing how Wildcards work for Historic cards. Starting after an update in November, crafting a Historic card will require you to redeem two Wildcards of the appropriate rarity instead of one.

?

^ Me when reading this for the third time.
After a lot of very welcome changes, this feels kinda out of place.
How does doubling the cost of Historic cards help... with anything? Could this be explained further? Did I even read it right?
Out of my head I can't think of any argument on this change helping to build up a good non-rotating format.
This is one odd thing within a lot of good ideas, as I see it. But it confuses me nontheless

MTG Arena’s economy is built with S...

@Eisigerhauch#72959:

Will historic exclude all cards from standard?

Nope! Standard cards are legal in Historic.

@Myrddrin:

Didint check that as previously that thing was all locked threads. I freely admit this was my mistake

Apology accepted.

@Myrddrin:

As "human error kicks in again (aka forgetting to post the new state of beta) here the link
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/magi...

Go check News and Announcements???

@SeriousPaul#78974:

Since I'll never give up, this will indeed be along thread. I especially will not give up because of childish insults, or because someone makes an offhand snarky remark online.


As such each day I will post until they see that this is a good idea.

That's not cool, friend. Please don't do that.

Again, as with any change to the economy, we’ll be monitoring both player behavior in-game and player feedback. If a card is reprinted into a Standard set you will only pay one Wildcard for that version and it can be used in Historic (only the old version costs 2).

@Sirius:

@MTG Arena Admin:

It's a difficult problem to tackle, but to do so, we're changing how Wildcards work for Historic cards. Starting after an update in November, crafting a Historic card will require you to redeem two Wildcards of the appropriate rarity instead of one.

?

^ Me when reading this for the third time.
After a lot of very welcome changes, this feels kinda out of place.
How does doubling the cost of Historic cards help... with anything? Could this be explained further? Did I even read it right?
Out of my head I can't think of any argument on this change helping to build up a good non-rotating format.
This is one odd thing within a lot of good ideas, as I see it. But it confuses me nontheless

MTG Arena’s economy is built with Standard and Draft at the forefront. We found that this was the best solution for the long-term health of the game. A...