devtrackers.gg
Imagine banning someone for this hahaha. They need to get rid of a few mods over there.
Did you read the post? He wasn’t banned for the content but for the amount of times and the places it was posted.
Imagine banning someone for this hahaha. They need to get rid of a few mods over there.
Did you read the post? He wasn’t banned for the content but for the amount of times and the places it was posted.
In case you missed it or others find this point, MOOD has addressed it in a mail to the UK backers.
Dear backer,
Good news: it's with great relief that we can tell you that we're currently processing payment back to you, and all other UK backers, who were charged extra fees to receive their copy of the game.
We’ve been terribly frustrated about ending our first worldwide fulfillment with such a chaotic delivery for the UK. Sorry that you had to experience this, and thanks for your patience with us as we sorted this out. You can expect the refunded money to be at your disposal within 2 weeks.
This whole thing has been a big learning experience for us, and we're doing our best to make sure this bad experience is only ever a one-off thing. We've teamed up with some international logistics specialists to help us smooth out this process, and you can expect better communication about that from us in the future.
On behalf of...
That's a loot raptor and I am not going to discuss it.
I do have DMs open but I have not gotten warnings for the 2 events I would also like to ask to be unbanned while I am here cause I think that ban was kinda unfair
Going to need a username
I just wanna say that there really are not any request from moderators to stop in my experience like when I got muted no warning for typing diggy diggy hole in response to a post when there was no rule stating it wasn’t allowed and I got no request to stop and number 2 I got banned by i believe tater for posting a joke about playing tic tac toe on someone’s forehead in non drg chat as a response to somebody else’s post and I got banned no warning just felt you should know that your mods don’t really like to give any warning
Not always. There’s half a million people on the server, and things can happen fast. Warnings are usually issue through a bot, so if you’re not able to receive DMs you might miss it, but I don’t have insight in everything single thing that happens.
The daily challenges reward a specific amount of scrip which afterward will give pass points instead. So no it's not unlimited. You get the exact amount of scrip required.
This is correct.
Is this a trolley problem?
ROCK AND ROLL AND STONE!
That’s gonna be a no from me, dawg. Clean your room and keep your sex toys to yourself.
If I get wind of people brigading bots in other subreddits for the sake of some silly ranking list, I'm taking the bot on a ride to a farm far away where it can frolic with other retired bots.
Restore your save to a version before you got all that extra progress from the host. Or don't if you're fine with it.
Hey u/Diribiri - for some reason, I can't start a chat with you, but I'm reaching out because we used this meme in this blog post a little while back, and we're looking into getting that blog post printed, so I'd just wanted to make sure you were okay with that.
He created his own company because he kept getting turned down for dev jobs because they said he was obviously self taught and unhireable.
He worked as a game developer for King in Sweden from 2004 to 2009. Minecraft was released in 2009.
let them come here and tell us why they are the only game company that can't implement water.
What the others said. Their sources are us.
minecraft did it with noob self taught coders
Water in blocks is not close to what would be needed here - and not sure what you mean by “Noob self taught coders”. Notch was already in the industry when he made Minecraft, and presumably coded the water.
I’m locking this as we are not interested in having modded servers appear unmodded. I know there’s some good arguments in regards to population, but on our end we get a ton of support issues and useless bug reports, when people do this.
The player in question could not be allowed to vote. Maybe to settle tiebreaker issues the vote has to be unanimous to kick.
Why shouldn’t the player being voted on get a say? You’re assuming that voting to kick someone will only be applicable towards people who are trolling. It might as well be trolls starting the vote. Regardless, voting on anything with few players is an issue on many other levels too. You can’t guarantee players will vote, either. It generally only works with a player count that’s high enough to make a decision with a proper majority. Only letting 1-3 players have a vote makes it hard to get something unanimous. It’s just moving the power from the host to a random non-transparent system that will change with the amount of players.
why have the guy vote for himself the other 3 should be the ones participating in a vote kick that will make it an odd number
Why shouldn’t the player being voted on get a say? You’re assuming that voting to kick someone will only be applicable towards people who are trolling. It might as well be trolls starting the vote. Regardless, voting on anything with few players is an issue on many other levels too. You can’t guarantee players will vote, either. It generally only works with a player count that’s high enough to make a decision with a proper majority.
Usually in games the player getting vote kicked doesn’t get a vote in their own kick. Meaning in a 4 player lobby there would never be a tie, it would be 3 for, 2 for 1 against or 1 for 2 against voting to kick the person
Assuming voting is only to kick. It could also be calling the droppod. Also assuming that all players would vote. If they don’t there can still be a tie. It would mean no kicking with two players only OR the power being returned to the host, but only in some cases. There’s a bunch of other issues too, so that’s not a solution. No system is without issues, but currently having the host decide is the simplest system with the least friction.
Voting only really works in games with more players per session.
2 players would be an instant tie, assuming you vote against getting kicked.
3 players would leave the second player as kingmaker, if they even vote. If they don’t, it’s a tie.
4 players could have have ties in a couple of situations, depending on whether all vote or not.
How to solve ties? Does the host tip the scale? Then we’ve added layers of complexity and not solved the issue. We’ll have a non-transparent voting system that needs to assign some sort of weight to the votes and it wouldn’t really work. For votes to function properly, you need a minimum of players to guarantee it makes sense.