Smin1080p

Smin1080p



19 Mar

Comment

The suggestion has already been passed. Its not planed to move lines currently.

Comment

Pilot interviews are unfortunately not accepted as primary sources. Experience can vary from person to person and often personal biases can sometimes get in the way of facts.


So for this reason and others, primary sources are considered to be documents of authorative nature.


18 Mar

Comment

My bad, not enough coffee in the world for today

Comment

In terms of its overall characteristics and capabilities, it's closer to the M than the Lima. Whilst they are close, the Magic II is on the upper end of that spectrum.



Once we have some more detailed factual statisrics to check over and go by, we can then begin to make decisions on BR or missile changes. For launch however, Magic II at this time is simply not required.

Comment

R550 II is closer to the AIM-9M + or R-73. Both of which are not currently in game. The MLD also does not yet have its all aspect R-60Ms either. Magic 2s performance far exceeds almost every other missile.

Comment

Magic 2s capabilities far exceed almost all missiles in game. Magic 1 itself remains one of the top missiles in game. Currently the Mirage F.1C will have several solid loadouts without the need to come immediately with a missile significantly better than everything else current.


First the developers want to introduce the aircraft and monitor the statistics closely.

Comment

Completely understandable. But lets try to keep things on the constructive track rather than the potentially adding a more flammable one please

Comment

Everything on both the dev servers and dev streams is made clear from the beginning that it is subject to change. The streams are very clearly labelled as "Work in progress" and on the patch notes and server, we also make it clear:



So lets please not go any further down this road of misleading or false advertising. Nothing was promised and everything was made quite clear that these are not final in any capacity.

Comment

As I have said for the 3rd time. Vehicles are often uploaded to the server in an unconfigured state, incomplete with wrong/missing/unfinished modules, payloads, DMs and FMs. This is not new at all.

Comment

This is a test server. We always warn everyone that its subject to change and in the case of the Mirage and J-8, both of them were heavily work in progress. People were scrambling for the Mirage to be shown on the dev servers, so when we have a possibility to do that at the earliest possible time, its only natural that its going to be in a very much early state of final development.

Comment

Neither of them were confirmed or promised to come. There is a very clear warning on the streams that everything is subject to change. Just like the dev server.

Comment

Indeed )


I'm going to get stuck into these two:

Comment

Please stop spamming. Answers have already provided.

Comment

We would need some supporting evidence on this as the same claim was made for the Jaguar GR.1 having 4 missiles. But it turned out the wiring only made it possible for 2 AIM-9Gs in different configurations.

Comment

We do not use on paper measurements to determine BRs. If an aircraft performs below where it should at its initial BR, it will be changed.

Comment

Im referring to BRs in BR updates.


If an aircraft performs badly, its BR can change.


Right now you are talking about an aircraft thats WIP, been on the dev server for a matter of hours and not even live yet.

Comment

BRs can change. The aircraft is not even in game yet.

Comment

This has already been explained. Aircraft generally have modules based on weaponry they can have. This is how they are initially configured if we already have that weapon setup in some way. You will not how the weapon was not added. Only a config module was.