Smin1080p

Chinese G does not really help the case of the Italian ASA.

We are not asking anyone to do anything. You made the claim the aircraft is "broken" and I have pointed out how only 2 issues were reported, both of which have been resolved.

If you believe something is incorrect and have the evidence to prove that, we can forward it for investigation. However this far, there have been no reports to fix.

As has been the case for other top teir aircraft, providing it's compatable to mount something, it's possible modifications from other variants will be considered. In this case flare/chaff is important for top tier. This is not incorrect and present on several top aircraft.

The other "multiple known aspeects of the aircraft" that are wrong have not been reported in any capacity.

The link is to a 3rd party website, which are themselves not accepted as secondary sources, since it's just an amalgamation of material without proper citation. It's also not relivant to the report in question.

Just for clarities sake and remaining on subject. A total of two reports have been submitted so far on the Mirage F.1C. One was already fixed on a later version of the Dev build before the report had even been forwarded, and the other cited sources from a static engine test bed thrust. So
there are no outstanding reports currently for the aircraft.

All nations have historical issues outstanding, some longer than 2 years. With two significant ones for the French tree have now been resolved this patch, as well as the Mirage F.1C coming, this should lead things in a positive direction.

Exceptions may apply. These are additional rules on top of the existing ones. Anything classified without clear declassification / public domain will still require proof as has always been the case.

The example of a Spitfire manual is a very clear situation. The manual originates pre-1980s has been cleared for public release and is being sold by the RAF themselves via offical means. This is a pretty wildish example.

There are examples of manuals post 1980 that do not have any obvious classification markings on them yet still are not cleared for the public domain. There have also been cases where something was falsely marked as declassified when it was in fact not.

As such, this requirement comes from the developers and our legal team. If material post 1980 is to be used that does not have a very clear source of declassification to the public domain, it must therefor be proven by the reporter that it is fit for use. Almost all other games / simulations operating in the same vain also require this.

The radar report has now been resolved. As far as im aware, that's all F-104S ASA reports dealt with.

The suggestion report to add S X AGM-12B will be treated purely as a suggestion and subject to further developer review and consideration. At the moment, there hasn't been any evidence it was used other than the manual and some Greek F-104S/Gs. So any additional sources would be welcome for the ASA.

Fixed.

Thank you for the report.

This suggestion has been forwarded to the developers for their consideration.

Please note: Loadout choices and decisions are down to the developers discretion.

Being present on google or any online resource is not proof of declassification.

As per our rules, proof of declassification / public domain use is required:

750lb M117s and Zuni Mk 32s have been added as per this report and subsequent material:

The source quotes static test bed figures. Thus are not the values of an airworthy aircraft's true engine output.

Hello

These are static test bed values for the engine and not actual thrust values for an airworthy aircraft. Additional source material will be required if the report is to be forwarded with the actual thrust values of the engine within the aircraft.

The aircraft is currently modelled with an Afterburner Thrust of 6800kg.

In addition, the source you posted is dated last 1990 and restricted. As such, proof of declassification will be required before any handling or submitting of any materials on or related to that document will be required as per our rules:

Fixed in the next major update.

Hello

As this is a secondary source, a second source will be required or a primary source as per the requirements:

Issue fixed. France now cannot into space

Hello. This is not a bug.

The developers are aware of aircraft having more advanced missiles possible, however not every aircraft will receive AIM-9L from the beginning. F-104S ASA will receive it as its the only IR missile it used other than AIM-9B. For the existing top tier aircraft, their statistics will be closely monitored and the missiles issued over time at the developers discretion.

Suggestions for all existing and advanced missiles possible for top tier aircraft have already been forwarded.

The only reported crash due to loadouts we had was the Mirage F.1C. Which has now been fixed.

We don't announce dev servers ahead of time until they happen. Right now, its time to process the reports from the one that just closed today and work through those reported issues.

Oh thank god. I really hoped so.

No doubt someone was gonna say it

Those 145,000 people are not all playing 11.3 my dude