Most other nations already had premiums. Nobody was forced to purchase it if you don't want to. Having another level of choice for a premium is not a bad thing.
Most other nations already had premiums. Nobody was forced to purchase it if you don't want to. Having another level of choice for a premium is not a bad thing.
Jaguar A now has some of the most advanced and longest standoff range laser guided missiles in game, which if used correctly, can defeat any SPAAG currently in game. Comparing them to mavericks is not the same as they are better in every respect.
Nothing to do with it being too good. It was not planned for this update. This update was planned to be the modernization of the Jaguars (A and GR.1A/B).
As we have said, more French Aircraft are in the works.
Same as with all the previous pre-release packs. For those that want to start playing them now and crew levelling.
It was added nearly a year ago and at the time was ready to go for France. A GE alternative jet to the Vautour was not a bad thing.
You cant buy them now. The packs go live with the update (For Xbox and PC, PS later).
He hasn't forgotten )
Just as he said it will be on release. We are not doing pre orders on these so it isn't possible to issue yet.
Not with this update.
Most of the Soviet/Russian tanks you are referring to already had the Dozer as part of the model.
Meanwhile whilst the Chieftain may share the same Dozer with several tanks, it still needs to then be added and configured to each and every one in the correct way.
We never claimed loadouts are 100% historical. If that was the case, over 50% of tanks in game would need to loose their shells and some would have to be flat out removed from the game as a result. Many aircraft and helicopters would also have to loose loadouts. The Harrier GR.1 follows the same rule as the F-4F, F-104S and many, many others that is if its technically possible without limitation and linked to the aircraft in some way, it can be considered.
The F-4EJ KAI JADAM was not removed because its "historically inaccurate", it simply isn't possible for the aircraft to carry them or use them. So im not really sure of the direction of this "historically accurate" discussion.
The aircraft did not have the capabilities required to even use them.
Because the weapon was designed for use with the Harrier GR.1 in mind. The aircraft did not require modification. As long as something is technically possible on the aircraft without that and linked via some sort of source or connection, it can be considered.
The same cannot be said with the EJ Kai and JDAMS.
It has nothing to do with historical / unhistorical loadouts. Its a question if its even technically possible to mount 4. There just is not evidence showing it can right now.
It would have been a decision taken on the source material we have. So if you believe its incorrect and have information to show otherwise, please submit a report.
It has is integrated countermeasure dispensers by the engines and we don't have jammer pods yet.
You are confusing two different matters that don't correlate.
JDAM was removed as there is currently information showing they physically could not be used / guided on the EJ Kai because it did not have the equipment. It is a technical restriction.
The SRAAM was designed as a self contained unit, that did not require any additional systems and was tested on Hawkers Harriers demonstrator with compatibility for the GR.1 and intention for use on that aircraft. So there is no technical restriction and the system is by design compatible with the GR.1 and intended for it.
It was only submitted yesterday. There is no possible way it was going to get resolved that quickly. This is basically a dev server 2.5 with the missing content that was not on the last one.
We are aware of the reason why the overwing pylons exist, but we currently have no evidence if the wiring was added to allow for 4 missiles or the wiring was simply switched between upper and lower. Thus some form of proof is required showing that or showing 4 Sidewinders mounted.
A photo would be sufficient providing it showed an actual service aircraft and not a museum piece. So far the only photos have been of Jaguar Internationals in museums with 4 missiles just for display.
Again, it would need to be backed by some sort of technical possibility linked to the EJ Kai (tests, proposals, test evidence it was capable etc). If that's the case, we can pass the suggestion.