Smin1080p

So are thousands of other vehicles. Doesn't mean they are on topic.

A plethora of factors. Again, the most important thing to note is the vehicles themselves are very much still in development. If for example one may be ready to go but a bug or issue is then found in testing, all pictures, coubs, renders or any information may have to be entirely redone too.

But today was more about the fact we also had PvE to cover.

Because as I said earlier and as we have said countless times. Something being in the files is meaningless. Its not an indication its coming in the next patch and means nothing.

We have had some things in the files for years. It doesn't make them relevant for the next update.

Nope. Things simply got taken too far by some.

You go to the Wishlist topic and talk about it there:

Not so much wrong. More a case of a Dev Blog was possible for today but was not fully for certain. It seemed likely to come but didn't because we had the PvE test and required that.

As I said, plans can very quickly change and this is a prime example of why we dont give out hints and things up front because the same people that ask are also the same ones that complain when plans change.

Nope and also:

Being hyped is fine.

But that wasn't really anything to do with hype.

The same people who constantly ask day in day out "Will we have a dev blog today????" 50 times and then ask for hints where also the same people that then took things a little too far and spoiled things for everyone.

Being hyped and exited is entirely fine. But understand that this is the exact reason why we don't give out info ahead of time because plans change. Today was a prime example and showed again why we just cant do it.

Yes, tomorrow will be more fruitful )))

I hope. Otherwise this thread will probably implode faster than those buildings in the new nuke effects.

The C what now? Never heard of her.

Ok I think we need a bit of a cool of here guys.

We understand the disappointment at no vehicle Dev blog today, but beyond that it's getting a little over the top in here with some taking things a bit too far.

So for now we will close the thread and have a clean out.

We are 4 blogs in and haven't even shown some of the major players this patch. There is much more to come including some long awaited additions.

Unfortunately this is the issue when you want to know more and more up front and as always, plans can change. Hints are not always a good t

Little bit extreme 4 blogs in but ok.

Things change unfortunately.

Most likely no blog today now guys. Stay tuned for the rest of the week

Most likely just one today. But should make quite a few people happy.

Edit: Unfortunately, most likely no vehicle blog today. Sorry guys.

In the meantime, please try to stick to things actually on topic or take off topic jet / general aviation discussions to the correct place.

Also a friendly reminder a vehicle having a weapon / part of c*ckpit or any other asset in the files is meaningless and no indication at all it's coming in the next major. It doesn't make something on topic. So you can take it to the wishlist thread or relivant section.

No but I will now so you can take this elsewhere. Off topic.

Why are we talking about F-14s and MiG-29s again?

Neither are coming now and all of this is off topic. Take it to the correct place please.

Just to add, since I am Smin1080p who that document claims to take my comments from, its very much incorrect.

Even gets my other job wrong as my other job is not in CNC machinery

Its purely a lot of assumptions, none of it when it comes to "behind the scenes" detail is correct. Its pretty much all wrong.

Whilst its correct we don't influence BRs, but simply pass feedback, its incorrect on what we give as answers. As our answers come directly from developers.

We don't even have to tease at this stage.

I could just post a 4 year old screenshot from the website and the topic would be like

There is a number of A-129 fixes on the way. For now that's all I can share.