Smin1080p

Im a bit confused why a pre-series would even be brought up then since we only have the IVM in game?

Thank you. We can finally case close this one then at least.

No news for now. Its not been abandoned at all. But as was made clear in a previous developer Q and A, there are currently no plans to make it permanent.

Suggestion Moderators are recruiting!

Are you a dedicated and keen pilot, tanker or captain wishing to actively contribute and help shape the War Thunder Project?

The Suggestion Moderators team is currently looking for new recruits willing and eager to help improve the game by processing and evaluating feedback, submitted by players through the Moderated Suggestions section.

In particular, we are looking for users who reside within the North American and Asian regions or are otherwise active within the regular working hours of these two particular regions.

Suggestion Moderators are recruiting!

Are you a dedicated and keen pilot, tanker or captain wishing to actively contribute and help shape the War Thunder Project?

The Suggestion Moderators team is currently looking for new recruits willing and eager to help improve the game by processing and evaluating feedback, submitted by players through the Moderated Suggestions section.

In particular, we are looking for users who reside within the North American and Asian regions or are otherwise active within the regular working hours of these two particular regions.

Unfortunately we cant force the template to reappear on every new topic once you have approved. But we will place it in the guidelines of all sections.

We hope to be able to share some more news on it soon. We are just waiting for the developers to complete everything before we go into further detail.

At no stage here have I said not to report something:

Quite simple really. In the Aircraft Weapons and Ordinance area specifically for this

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1957-weapons-and-ordnance/

Bug reports are extremely clear how to do it. Every section has a clear set of rules that contains everything you need to know:

On top of this, whenever you make a topic, a template you can literally copy/paste and fill in the blanks, making it even easier: https://f

Suggestion staff are telling you the minimum requirements to create a suggestion topic for a vehicle. After that, it can be passed onto the developers for review.

It is now however the requirements and standards used by the developers and not any sort of conformation such a vehicle will be accepted or viable for the game. So no, there is no guarantee P.30/43 will be considered or implemented. Simply that it meets the requirements for a suggestion to be created.

Hope that helps ^

Regardless of who has what, as I've already said, all that's needed at this stage is proper report. Discussing what we have already concluded here serves no purpose.

We have already said one is in development. Nothing was promised for a previous update.

You are watching The Shooting Range – a weekly show for all tankers, airmen and Captains in War Thunder.

In this episode:

Pages of History: Flying Desk Frenzy


Triathlon: Comparing Early Helis


... and Metal Beasts: The Soviet Response to Phantoms

We have already answered this:

M60 AMBT was available for gold during the season.

Likely to be considered whenever the next economical review/patch occurs.

If its the offical manual then thats fine as a singular source. Though as far as im aware, the devs already have that. Which leads me to believe there is another reason why those presets are not in game based on other sources.

None the less, yes you can report this matter with this source and we can forward it to the devs for review.

Cool. Hadn't seen that one. So its known then

This source alone, even if correct, cannot prove that sufficiently unfortunately. There are no photos of this that have been found and no supporting evidence.

We have had no bug reports.

If it even does, its not enough alone for the devs to change it. No photos (that I have seen at least) show any of those configurations on the centreline rack. So it would need to be supported by stronger source material.

If properly sourced and bug reported

You did

You never responded so the topic was closed.

A technical moderator responded to you. Your sources were insufficient. The sources provided were for the Yak-36M and that we should simply trust the author because "Yefim Gordon's books are credible and solid" yet have been proven in many cases to have serious errors.

Sources on the Yak-38 specifically would be needed.