Smin1080p

This source does not show 3x magics. You are confusing the centre and outboard pylon arrows.

Again, nobody has said none of them cant/wont come. Only that right now, only the Jaguar A has been confirmed by the devs to be planned.

Ive also only seen a report on Su-7BLK having SPS-141. The report did not cover SU-7B. Yak-38 I also dont think has been reported.

Not being able to land in general on shorter fields (as they don't have drag chutes) I would say is pretty important.

Right now it effects nothing but the EBR. Nothing close by too.

As I said, we dont have the feature right now because it would have no impact in the current game terms. If things change, it will be reconsidered.

I dont recall ever promising them. I said further countermeasures (such as SPS-141) were being considered and more worked on.

I pointed out to those asking for some on some aircraft, that we already had other systems (again such as SPS-141) that had been suggested / requested before even the Jaguars.

But I never confirmed SPS-141 would 100% come. Jaguar A's countermeasures are the only ones we have officially said are planned.

Reverse thrust becomes more and more a very important feature of several aircraft that are possible in the future.

The retractable wheel function is not a bug. By design it is intended to be this way as in game, due to the way wheel vehicles are modelled, there would be no difference between 4 to 8 wheeled handling.

So as of right now, that would be a purely visual thing with no in game benefit. If the system changes, then the feature will be reconsidered.

As I explained and as you saw, MARS 15 was one of the last vehicles that just about made it in time for the update

Had it not have been added, there would have been no true domestic French ground vehicle this patch, after people made it clear they wanted one badly.

Any bug report will be forwarded to the devs and reviewed in due course.

it has a very old model, as such, unless plans come along to revamp the model to newer standards, we dont have any plans to bring it back in either tree.

Im not really sure what your point is here? The lists themselves are no longer valid. That means there is going to be things on there that may never come at all. But you will also notice in the past 5 years since they were made, probably 100+ vehicles not on those lists were added. Thats why we got rid of them. Because plans change, decisions change and a lot of other factors are involved.

2 aircraft that happened to be on these long outdated lists were added (Probably more than that) just because they were some of the aircraft still within our plans. It does not mean you should e

No longer valid. They were only proposals at the time. Nothing was 100% guaranteed.

Technically speaking, it's always had one with an unlockable camo ))

https://warthunder.com/en/news/7091/current/

Why do I sense a ping about MIG-21 camos coming ))

If you believe you have found an issue, then please properly report is as you know needs to be done. A discussion topic is not a bug report and is not going to get it fixed at all.

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1973-ground-vehicles/

The battle pass collectively rewards for all areas of the game and it does, as you said yourself provide challenges to earn those rewards. As such, those challenges are intended to cover all areas of the game including Naval and not just Aviation and Ground. We do not have any current plans to change these requirements (in terms of needing Naval contributions as well as air and ground for Challenges), however future passes may have different missions and challenge entirely, as with the previous one.

The Chinese F-104Gs never used countermeasures / flares. Hence why it was not implemented.

As for BR changes, we will continue to monitor the situation and make any necessary changes in a future BR update.

Unfortunately, based on the current sources, its not entirely proven. Something more solid is needed. It describes it more as toss bombing than an actual CCIP featured on other aircraft.

Unless that can be supported with further sources.

So far, the only open reports we have are:

Missing CCIP



Cannon not slaved to FLIR




Cannot install AAMs on inboard pylons (Currently disputed, our consultants are seeking more information as this is supposedly only a modernized version. We are waiting for other validation)

Helicopter PvEs development is not necessary connected to a major update. So it's possible. But when we have more news to share on it, we will update everyone.

My major update bingo card is ready

New rumor roundup is open!