Hello
We have no plans to remove these nations.
All of them have their own unique and domestic vehicles and many players are interested and invested in these induvial nations.
We will continue to expand their vehicle rosters to include even more domestic vehicles.
There will be some.
You can’t purchase GE on dev-server. If you managed to do that somehow, create a request in support please.
There’s a link on your screenshot that explains everything about gift restrictions. Please read it.
Our support team is not 24/7 and has a very reduced staff on weekends. Do not create new requests until you got the reply - all you accomplish is putting your ticket to the end of the queue and waiting for few more days.
No. It will be a separate PC account.
Only 2 packs in this update.
50G is the dual plane loading. 35G is the correct load limit for how all missiles are modelled in game in a single plane.
Hello guys!
Thank you for your feedback.
We are following your comments and wanted to clarify that the Su-25T will not be the last or final variant of the Su-25 in the researchable branch. In the future, we plan additional variants which will also supersede the Su-39 in terms of capabilities and provide the best versions of the aircraft within the main tree.
The Su-39 coming was the variant of the Su-25 taken to shows and exhibitions intended for export sales. Hence why it will be premium.
More advanced versions of the aircraft will come to the tree in the future.
I understand you personally want to see it, but the tank is already in game in some form and asking every major update is not going to change that unfortunately.
There are many vehicles, variants or national operators that could have been added of many vehicles across the game. They are not all introduced at once.
As we have said, its possible it may be introduced to the British tree at some point. But right now, its not within plans for this major or relevant here.
You are more than free to discuss any rumours in that topic. That's entirely correct. We are naturally following all the discussions and topics regarding the dev server.
We however do not officially comment on things not yet announced. Being in the files is not an offical announcement in that regard.
Please re-read what I said. We already said when the Ram was first introduced that we don't rule out adding it to the British tree.
Any new vehicles coming or not coming to the British tree have not changed the situation behind the Ram or mean its going to be introduced this major update.
A connection is being made that is not one. Nobody said the Ram has no connection to the British tree. Simply that its not relevant to the discussion or anything happening now.
We have not announced any such vehicle right now and as you know, we do not comment on things in the files. Being in the files does not mean its coming right now.
Nothing to do with this major update. As we have said many times, we don't rule out adding the Ram II to the British tree. But there are no plans for this right now and its addition has no connection to what the British tree is or is not.
Its too soon to really be talking about it right now. The aircraft is not in any immediate plans.
The F-14B was the next progression of the aircraft and line and planned to come at this time.
Hey
Firstly, we don't plan to introduce AIM-7F, AIM-9L or any better purely air-to-air ordinance for the aircraft right now, as this would result in a BR increase. Its currently suited to its specific BR.
Regarding Pave Spike, the devs are investigating adding the capability to the F-4E, but there isn't a conclusive outcome right now that I can definitively talk about.
For the TISEO pod, I would recommend making a post in the Major Update feedback (since its new to this update) to suggest it and we can pass that on in the update feedback.
Hey
Currently there is nothing to report on this matter for this major update. But we are forwarding all feedback as always with suggestions and recommendations.
Hello
Threads are locked if there are multiple topics in the same area open or feedback topics already open where we are already collecting said feedback. Or if they are rule breaking.
Topics being all over the place makes it significantly harder to track and collect all feedback.
As you can see, any topics locked are left with a redirection to an appropriate topic or section to use to discuss that. As we are following and reading all comments
Thanks
Hello
These sources state:
MICA was designed to replace the 530D and Magic 2 missiles in service.
Multi-target abilities are only valid when combined with MICA.
They do not however state anywhere that the Mirage 2000-5F cannot mount and fire Magic 1, 2 or Super 530D/F in any way.
The fact MICA was designed as a replacement to both Magic 2 and 530D, is not an indication itself that the aircraft cannot use the missiles. Carrying missiles in service or duty is also not a rule or requirement for the game.
As we have already explained, MICA is currently too advanced for the game. Therefor Super 530D and Magic 2 are the best available loadouts possible for the aircraft.
Unfortunately this is not the case.
We have explained why we have chosen to make the Mirage 5F the way we have here:
So far, no information has been submitted via a proper report to prove any of that is incorrect. Therefor, if you believe it is, we welcome any sourced reports to be submitted for the developers consideration.
Hey. It was submitted in the weekly feedback, but the major update is currently the major focus for everyone.
devtrackers.gg