War Thunder

War Thunder Dev Tracker




24 Dec

Post
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

Today we're going to show you some new bombing feats, skillful air and naval multikills, and one incredible lucky miss. Let's go!








So, what do you do if something incredible happens in your battle that deserves to appear in Thunder Show?

While in the game, go to “Community > Replays” and find the replay.


Press the “Rename” button and give it a memorable name.


Open the Replays folder in the game folder: search for the file with the name you have just given it.


Attach the file to an email and send it to [email protected].


Also, do not forget to mention in the email:

The exact time of the moment you want to share


...

Read more
Comment
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

No reports on such issues atm.

If you experience such problems, please submit bug report in Technical Section.

Thanks!

Comment
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

If you are in "Member" group, you can post on same sections as any forum member.

Sections like Suggestions or Bug Reports are pre-moderated - it means that you need to post your topic according to it's internal rules and wait for moderator to approve it.

Comment
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

We already got Tank Only discussion. Please use it.

Comment

It is Christmas Eve my dude, we just had the last major only 1 week ago. Little too early to be digging.

Post

  • The ‘blind’ sector 90 degrees relative to the target’s course has been increased 1.5 times for pulse-doppler modes of AN/APG-59 and AN/AWG-11/12 and slightly decreased for AN/APG-66J and PS-37A/46A.
Sound
  • RWR sounds have been changed to something less annoying and loud. The reference sound used has been brought from the F-14 Tomcat RWR.


The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.
Post
    /u/ on Steam - Thread - Direct
A lil somethin somethin: You can find the details for this event on the announcement page here.
Post
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

The ‘blind’ sector 90 degrees relative to the target’s course has been increased 1.5 times for pulse-doppler modes of AN/APG-59 and AN/AWG-11/12 and slightly decreased for AN/APG-66J and PS-37A/46A.

Sound

RWR sounds have been changed to something less annoying and loud. The reference sound used has been brought from the F-14 Tomcat RWR.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.





Leave feedback here

Post
    Stona_WT on Forums - Thread - Direct

The ‘notch’ sector 90 degrees relative to the target’s course has been increased 1.5 times for pulse-doppler modes of AN/APG-59 and AN/AWG-11/12 and slightly decreased for AN/APG-66J and PS-37A/46A.

Sound

RWR sounds have been changed to something less annoying and loud. The reference sound used has been brought from the F-14 Tomcat RWR.

The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.


23 Dec

Comment

Its within the last Q and A video. Not a written one.

Comment

They were removed to streamline research at a time when the Soviet and German trees were being drastically expanded in certain areas. They were also basically identical vehicles within the same tree. Whereas you are comparing this to similar / variants across multiple trees.


As BVV explained in the last Q & A, each tree is treated independently of the others. So because there is a Sherman in one, does not mean there cannot be a Sherman in another.

Comment

There is no reason to create new or additional rules when historical vehicles exist to be included in the tree.


Again, your personal opinion on this is well documented. So there is no reason to re run this discussion yet again. I was simply explaining that there are no plans or reason to changes said plans to remove any of the historically used vehicles of Italy.

Comment

You are also fighting prototypical / experimental vehicles that never saw combat in any form, on locations where they never met with nations that also did not fight directly side by side. So they are actually more historical than most of those other matters that are also big parts of the game and always will be.


Among those ranks there are also a plethora of other domestic vehicles within the matchmaker and the question about decompressing Battle Ratings was regarding top tier, not the middle ranks.

Comment

I have already previously explained this. It is not a game bug so is not a bug report. To submit a historical report, then you need historical documentation or source material with something factually grounded. If it is neither of those two things, then it is a suggestion, one that has already been passed in the main update feedback.



I had already previously said this:




There is no factual backing to support this. Purely your opinion. Those tanks are not diminishing or preventing the popularity of the Italian tree from rising. Since they were added, there has been a positive impact from them.



You do not have to play any of the vehicles you do not wish to. You can unlock them, simply not crew them and move onto something else. Because you personally do not enjoy / want the...

Read more
Comment

We already passed the suggestion as one of you (I can't recall who exactly) mentioned it both during Dev server and update feedback. So they are aware.



There is no reason for them to be removed. All nations have vehicles they historically used. Additionally not everyone shares the same point of view with you on that. So it's not a good idea to speak for everyone.

Comment

There are no plans to replace any tanks that were used in service. Additional tanks may be added, but there is no reason to replace historical vehicles.