devtrackers.gg
Our devs are looking at the issue.
edit: fixed.
Our devs are looking at the issue.
edit: fixed.
General
BR changes have been implemented (view in a new tab).
Research, purchase, crew training costs and other related parameters for vehicles have been changed. View the tablesheet with the main parameters in a new tab. All economy indicators for vehicles will be changed according to rank.
Repair costs and award multipliers have been changed (view a new tab).
Ammunition costs have been changed (view a new tab).
The cost of torpedoes used by ships has been reduced by 50%. The cost for weaponry presets have been recalculated and may not have been exactly halved due to rounding.
A bug causing overpriced torpedoes for the Type T-1 has been fixed.
Aviation tech tree changes:
USA:
P-26A-34 M2, P-26A-33, P-26B-35, P-400, P-39N-0, P-39Q-5, P-3...
Read moreGeneral
BR changes have been implemented (view in a new tab).
Research, purchase, crew training costs and other related parameters for vehicles have been changed. View the tablesheet with the main parameters in a new tab. All economy indicators for vehicles will be changed according to rank.
Repair costs and award multipliers have been changed (view a new tab).
Ammunition costs have been changed (view a new tab).
The cost of torpedoes used by ships has been reduced by 50%. The cost for weaponry presets have been recalculated and may not have been exactly halved due to rounding.
A bug causing overpriced torpedoes for the Type T-1 has been fixed.
Aviation tech tree changes:
USA:
P-26A-34 M2, P-26A-33, P-26B-35, P-400, P-39N-0, P-39Q-5, P-3...
Read moreCM25 jest odmianą CM21 do zwalczania czołgów. To tajwański transporter opancerzony oparty na bazie amerykańskiego M113. CM25 trafi na szczyt chińskiego drzewka sił naziemnych w aktualizacji “Ognisty Deszcz”, gdzie będzie czekał na wszystkich zaprawionych w bojach pancerniaków.
Pokrótce: tajwański transporter opancerzony, wyposażony w wyrzutnię TOW, która pozwala zwalczać siły pancerne.
CM25, niszczyciel czołgów, Chiny, VI era.
Zalety
Potężna odmiana TOW
Mała sylwetka
Możliwość pływania
Wady
Lekkie opancerzenie
Niewielki zapas amunicji
Historia
Od lat 60. XX wieku siły z...
The CM25 is a tank hunter modification of the CM21 - a Taiwanese APC based on the widespread American M113. Coming as part of the upcoming update, the CM25 will soon await all seasoned tank commanders as the new top tank destroyer of the Chinese ground forces tree!
Briefly: A Taiwanese APC, fitted with TOW missiles to give it anti-tank capabilities.
CM25, tank destroyer, China, VI rank.
Pros
Powerful TOW versions
Small silhouette
Amphibious
Cons
Light protection
Limited ammunition
...
Renderowanie za pomocą Metal (API) zostało włączone na Mac OS.
Zespół War Thunder
Metal render has been enabled for Mac OS.
The current provided changelog reflects the major changes within the game as part of this Update. Some updates, additions and fixes may not be listed in the provided notes. War Thunder is constantly improving and specific fixes may be implemented without the client being updated.
They will come at some stage.
Its a little more complicated than just saying "they look the same, so add them both". I appreciate people want both, but its not possible to introduce both at once and certainly not possible to rush the GR.1A to completion now because a few people are unhappy with the GR.1.
GR.1A will come in time in some form, but for now we have GR.1 which is better than no Jaguar at all.
Perhaps you should have looked into the aircraft more and found out it was the RAFs main strike / CAS aircraft and not an "agile fighter" and adjusted your expectations accordingly?
Jaguar was not and never will be a pure fighter or air superiority aircraft. It was a strike aircraft with the means to defend itself. It was never supposed to go toe-to-toe with a Phantom. So when you put in that regard, of course is going to be disappointing. Its like putting a Firecrest and a Sea Fury in a ring together and saying "but I thought the Firecrest would be better at this".
Because the initial French version was better?
Perhaps compare the number of French jets in game to British ones and then reconsider that its hardly a crime France gets another good one maybe?
Very soon I believe. Before the major.
We are not going to reveal plans of upcoming updates and what is/is not coming this early.
The devs do and have. I asked because you are asking me and im not a developer. I cant just go to the devs and say "add the missing payloads".
Its very possible lots of these payloads are planned or already coming. I ask because for me to check, its best to at least present something rather than just waste time with "gib missing paylods" that mean nothing at all.
The Phantoms are top tier aircraft and superior to Jagaur. Comparing them to the GR.1 and saying "but they are better" is meaningless.
No we are not stripping Jaguar of its historical air-to-airs and even then it would not go to 9.7.
Once again, with this logic, why should we add any aircraft below 10.3?
Why would anyone that owns a FGR.2 want to play a new WW2 aircraft thats added, or a new postwar aircraft, or a new jet of any kind?
The answer is because its a new iconic aircraft. Its not always about being top dog and Britain have 3 of those right now with the 2 Phantoms and Lightning.
This kind of argument is basically saying "just dont bother adding any new jets unless they are top BR competitive".
GR.1 as its being in...
Read moreJaguar International is a separate variant entirely for the export market based on a GR.1, but is not a GR.1. We have an RAF GR.1 variant as it was during the 1970s. Jagauar International =/= GR.1.
Please see my earlier posts. We intend to add GR.1A in some form later, so there is no reason to make GR.1 a clone of GR.1A with all the features better suited to that model.
GR.1 is correct as it is with its Sidewinders how they are.
Hello.
The Jaguar variant we have is an early GR.1 not a GR.1A. Thats a later variant which were progressively upgraded over time later gaining features such as the overwing pylons and other elements.
As such, its correct that the GR.1 we have does not have flares. These will come in later modifactions.
At the moment there are not any plans for this.
Early Lightnings would be even worse, with the exception really of the F.3 which has better performance, but trades that for a complete lack of any guns and only 2 missiles.
Then there are also the Frankenstein F.2 variants which could technically have up to 4 ADENs in some configurations, but an extreme lack of fuel..
So thats why F.6 as its the definitive variant.
Thats part of the fuselage and early GR.1s did not have flares.
You can see by the photos of the Sidewinder trials in Germany flares were not mounted.
This is a SEPECAT Jaguar International. An different variant of the aircraft.
As I have already explained, we have a GR.1 with its correct sidewinder mounting. Overwing Pylons, later engines and the later upgrades will come in a future variant (GR.1A).
Such as? Please provide evidence (sources) to what its missing and I can confirm with the developers.
Hello
Please provide sources to specify the "better ballistics" and performance differences here. There is nothing of substance for this matter than can be forwarded or changed as there is no values or evidence to forward. M247 is a Warhead for CVR-7 and a correct example of one.
WUD-5002B has already been forwarded for consideration. but it was not in service until 1993
