devtrackers.gg → Battlefield V
Battlefield V

Battlefield V Dev Tracker




All Patch Notes Twitter News Twitch Reddit
View
View: List Card

13 Mar

DISCUSSION: Battlefield V's Vehicles - Planes, Tanks, and Transports

Comment

I’d love to see transport vehicles take a little more damage before they go immobilized. It seems like the first hit from any explosion they slow to a crawl and you have to abandon them.

As far as vehicles to add I’d love to see B-17s,B-24s, and B-29s. I loved the B-17 in BF1942 and the muromets inBF:1. I’ve always been a fan of the slower heavier bombers vs the current fast ones in game. To round out planes the P-38 lightning just looks to cool not to have on my armory screen.

Soviet Katyusha Rocket trucks. Another one of my BF1942 favorites. It should be weak as a transport, but rain fire death onto the battlefield.

Finally my favorite vehicle from BF1942 submarines. I mean who doesn’t want to stealthily surface next to an enemy boat, climb up on its deck and knife everyone in gun emplacements?

Tactical Tuesday w/ Prophet_On_Fire

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

Tactical Tuesday w/ Prophet_On_Fire

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

11 Mar

Meaty Monday w/ Freshmeatuk

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

10 Mar

🔥Stellar Sunday w/ Ascend_Dazs🌟

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

🔥Stellar Sunday w/ Ascend_Dazs🌟

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

09 Mar

🔥Saturday Skirmish w/ Ascend_Dazs🌟

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

Its good to see a lot of positivity again in the BF community!

Comment
    /u/tiggr on Reddit - Thread - Direct

Originally posted by sirdiealot53

thanks tiggr :D

hows your time off? hows the baby?

It's getting routine now, and it's pretty great I must say :). Finally have time to play games for the first time off work for like 4 years. Got some catching up to do.


08 Mar

DISCUSSION: Gadgets, Equipment, and Grenades

Comment

Originally posted by DigTw0Grav3s

Assault:

  • Good variety of options.
  • Looking forward to the rumored AA launcher.
  • Frag Grenade Launcher should probably compete with PIAT and 'Faust for slot space.

Medic:

  • The medical crate needs some reason to take it over the pouches.
  • Desperately need some gadget variety here. Less things that explode and more utility.

Support:

  • つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Give limpet. つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
  • I'd like to see a bangalore option, with an emphasis on destroying fortifications.

Recon:

  • Best variety out of all of the classes right now. Build gadget variety like this.
  • It would be nice to buff the sniper decoy up a little bit.
  • This class is crying out for a trip flare gadget.
  • Bring back K Bullets to take advantage of the bullet penetration mechanic, and hinder vehicle repairs.

General notes:

  • Current variety is poor.
  • AP mines ...
Read more

When in doubt, Limpet out!

"Battle of Hannut" Grand Operation in a nutshell

Comment

Originally posted by gmiwoj

IS THIS... a full frontal shield in a stationary AT gun that protects you from getting instantly sniped?

what kind of super advanced magic space technology is this?! what's next? maybe it can even turn around?

just imagine the possibilities! if we had couple of those, war would be over in a week!

The first person animation doesn't suggest it, but you are actually in full cover when aiming/idling the gun. The player is only exposed during reload. I am 99% that's how it since we released the Operation. Wasn't like this on launch though.

For people who were wondering how big the 4000lb bomb for the Mosquito actually is.

Comment

Originally posted by NoctyrneSAGA

Yep. This kind at least. Impact damage can be non-linear but blast so far is linear only.

For now.

Netcode and Visibility fix still needed

Comment
    /u/tiggr on Reddit - Thread - Direct

Originally posted by klarcwgrizwald

You hardly hear anything about it anymore but they are definately not right yet. Way too many wtf still with gunplay and after a few games my eyes are strained from trying to see into every dark nook and pile of wood. If i adjusted my screen anymore it would be solid white. Footsteps are also still hit and miss.

For netcode, turn on netgraph - and record video and post it for us! It will help find any remaining issues and fix em.

For visibility, specific areas and places called out usually is he way - it's based on per weather lighting settings and it's per area as well. So shoot em!

DISCUSSION: Gadgets, Equipment, and Grenades

Comment

I’d love to see the Limpet Mine return to support. It was such a fun and unique gadget. I’d also like smoke grenades to be an item every class can use, and refillable by ammo crates. Just the smoke grenades not the grenades that cause damage.

Its good to see a lot of positivity again in the BF community!

Comment
    /u/tiggr on Reddit - Thread - Direct

Originally posted by CornMang

I just looked it up to be more sure but I am fairly certain that DICE Sweden is making BFV, I couldn't find any sources saying LA make the game.

Do you have any by chance?

Hey, I sure was part of both - and we're one DICE...

Dice please

Comment
    /u/tiggr on Reddit - Thread - Direct

I might be on parental - so I am donning my player hat: Dice pls!!

The map boundaries in Rush are absolutely atrocious once again.

Comment

Originally posted by natemach97

Hey! I have a question for ya that you may or may not be allowed to answer. When you say that "I designed the Rush setups on both" do you mean that you and only you designed it, or you worked with a team to design it and you were the lead on those? I understand if you're not allowed to tell me that, but I would love to know.

Also, I really enjoy seeing you and other DICE employees being more and more active on Reddit. Keep up the good work, wishing you and yours the best

I and only I set up where the objectives are placed, where the combat area is going to be and where the spawns are, as well as some other things, at least on Narvik and Twisted Steel.

I haven't designed the specifics of how Rush functions as a game mode, that is up to our great game-mode team. :)

The map boundaries in Rush are absolutely atrocious once again.

Comment

Originally posted by vitalityy

You need to look no further than the map design of BC2 and BF3 for inspiration on how to do rush correctly. I'm sure I dont need to tell you that the rush gamemode requires far more attention to detail than conquest due to the linear playstyle of the gamemode. I'm going to be honest, releasing rush 4 months post launch on only 3 maps seems like a way to set it up for failure, and die hard rush fans like myself don't hold much faith. I fear that fumbling this role-out in combination with the gamemode getting stale as its only 3 maps will lead to you guys saying "Hey guys we tried Rush, it just wasn't popular" and if thats the case, I and all the people I played rush with in past titles will be gone for good.

From my perspective at least, this is a chance to let you guys be in and help us define if Rush has a place in Battlefield V, and what that means. I'm very grateful that you and others spend so much time voicing your opinion in a constructive and detailed way - that way we can make the game greater, together. :)

The map boundaries in Rush are absolutely atrocious once again.

Comment

Originally posted by Kestrel1207

First of all I wanna apologize in case I came off as overly harsh when saying something like "absolutely atrocious", of course it's just massive exaggeration, you know how people do on the internet. Didn't mean to insult anyone's work or anything like that, obviously.

I didn't get a chance to play Narvik's second phase yet, unfortunately, but the 1st and 3rd sector on Narvik kind of has similar issues to the ones I mentioned for Twisted Steel.

1st phase Narvik currently is:

https://i.imgur.com/Iqz6R3O.jpg

It's pretty much the same thing. The MCOMs are very close to the out of bounds in direction of Attacker spawn again, meaning that essentially, if the Attacker can push out of his "spawn", they're directly at the MCOM.

Here's my very awful and not really thought out at all microsoft paint attempt to show what I'd change:

https://i.imgur.com/L9nIrg...

Read more

It might be just from my experience working on Breakthrough, but I've always been a little bit wary of giving defenders too much combat area movement away from the objectives because it can result in them taking positions the attackers doesn't expect (which is normally fine) and spend most of their time shooting said attackers in the side, which is a pretty common cause of frustration - "I get shot from everywhere" etc. Flanking and moving up as a defender is a valid strategy though - so those two things kind become two ends of a scale that have to be balanced.

That said, I agree with what you're saying and will take it to heart, and will likely at least change sector 1 Narvik. Thank you again for giving such detailed feedback. :)

🔥Thursday Throwdown w/ Deity7

Post
    Battlefield on Twitch

07 Mar

The map boundaries in Rush are absolutely atrocious once again.

Comment

Originally posted by Reclusifer

Really dont see why they didnt just tweak the breakthrough maps ever so slightly. That would of sufficed.

Anything that you personally would like to see?




Subscribe to RSS
Get Discord notifications

When do they post?

(GMT +0)
Something missing? Let us know and we'll add it!