Stellaris Dev Tracker

Foxosaur said: I believe the underlying point and general concern is that PDX may start on a slippery slope of selling content that the AI cannot use. Knowing that AI does not (cannot?) use the Paragons system is a second instance of it. If your demographic split of players show you that a good % play Single player then it seems quite fair for the community to expect a bit more openess and proactiveness about it, at least going forward, maybe even saying so on the DLC information.

I get the point but this is a non-issue. We make calls all the time about how the AI wi... Read more

_Are said: Thank you for the bugfix !
Are you considering a future balance patch, notably on leader cap and penalties ?

Balance? Sure! Leader cap? Unlikely, whenever we make a long term positive change it can annoy quite a few people. But in this case, the Leader cap being pretty tight is just better design.

...

Read more

Amightypie said: so seeing as how we keep getting old content but revitalised ( edit sectors).

when can we expect to see the return of different ftl types

Over my cold dead body.

Too many Pathfinding, Pacing and Testing issues to be worth it. Also just bad for gameplay.  

Thread moved to Stellaris' Suggestions subforum  

HFY said: This is a reputation risk for PDX.

They only want to put their name near reliable, low-risk candidates and since the exec who mandates this can't understand code nor quality of code, the metric they're going to pick is current popularity.

You must have proven popularity for them to allow you to share your popularity with them.

Since you have no knowledge of this, I caution you against making salacious accusations.  

MrFreake_PDX said: I've spent the last two years planning

 

civ_v_freak said: If you say empire sprawl is a relevant mechanic then you're either ignorant or not being honest... change my mind

play nice or dont play.

up to you if you want to change the way you behaved here.  

Soranya said: Nice, but how the heck can something like "not all ships have roles assigned" slip by the QA process?

Oh we noticed, I just decided to leave it in for fun. (This is a joke)  

darkestinsanity said: All my DLC keeps saying it's corrupted and I cannot play using the DLC since the update. Tried verifying the files ect ect.

Sad times as I really wanted to try out the update today

Make sure to disable your mods. We're aware of the launcher complainaing about corrupt files but the game and DLC should still work fine, it's a backend issue.  

dont bump your own thread  

T5_k said: There was no mention of compatibility of the 3.5.3 game version with the 3.5.2 version saves.
Can I update and play my 3.5.2 save or should I postpone the update and stay on v3.5.2 to finish my game?

We never guarantee backwards compat with older saves.
With a smaller patch like this, it's more likely to be fine. However there is a rollback branch and I'd advise backing up your save before giving 3.5.3 a try.  

{ "lightbox_close": "Close", "lightbox_next": "Next", "lightbox_previous": "Previous", "lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.", "lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow", "lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow", "lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen", "lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails", "lightbox_download": "Download", "lightbox_share": "Share", "lightbox_zoom": "Zoom", "lightbox_new_window": "New window", "lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar" } to the Suggestions subforum.  

Second. Best. Trailer. Eva.

(sorry, nothing beats the first teaser)  

Let's cool down and not argue even when disagreeing.  

OK settle down folks.

Let's keep these discussions productive and without bickering.  

{ "lightbox_close": "Close", "lightbox_next": "Next", "lightbox_previous": "Previous", "lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.", "lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow", "lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow", "lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen", "lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails", "lightbox_download": "Download", "lightbox_share": "Share", "lightbox_zoom": "Zoom", "lightbox_new_window": "New window", "lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar" } to the Suggestions subforum.  

3.4.3 rollback branch should be up now. Blessed be the Tech Lead.  

Closed at request of writer.  

Big shoutout to those reporting bugs. You've made it very easy to get the big ticket items in the crosshair today.  

Moved