Do you even play the game dude?????

Extensively, and like many others I'm aware of the fact that structure and cap proliferation as well as obscenely unbalanced wealth distribution are some of the largest issues there are.

Limits on the number of structures a system/constellation/region can host is also viable for capping structure spam.

As for AFKing - there's a simple solution - don't put all your eggs in one basket.

Yeah, that's why I'd also restrict the number of structures you could put down in a system, or perhaps a constellation, too.

Yep, it's something that we've talked about - I think CCP karkur has been investigating some stuff related to it, but I'm not 100% sure :)

Caps docking in NPC stations - yes, everywhere - you want to own them, be prepared to have to build the infrastructure to support them.

Capping NPC station hangar capacities - no not everywhere, just in nullsec - if organizations out there want to hold space, they should have to create their own infrastructure from the ground up in order to do so.

Like it or not, NPC nullsec is called NPC nullsec for a reason. It doesn't belong to a player alliance, it belongs to the faction that holds sov.

I don't wield any power.

If I did, New Eden would be a hellscape of hardcore torture where you had to work to achieve and maintain greatness.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/cevkve/limit_asset_safety_diminishing_returns/eu5c6rz/

:)

That alternative is NPC stations.

Yeah, that's why I'd also stop caps from docking in NPC stations too, and put a cap their hangar capacity as well :)

We put some SP into a starter pack because we thought it'd help new players with the restriction of buying one per account.

We failed to restrict the starter pack to new accounts, and when this was pointed out by the community, we realized we'd screwed up and released a clarification to say that we'd be fixing this. A fix is in the works afaik.

Whether you like it or not, the games industry is changing and EVE needs to change with it. That's just the reality of things.

The intention isn't to break down the core pillars of what make EVE the game it is, but at the same time if we can ease the path for new players to get into the game and have fun, then we'll look at doing so - even at the risk of rustling the jimmies of some of our existing players along the way.

I'll be direct and say that this is of course my own opinion and not the opinion of CCP, but personally I'm getting tired of people freaking out every time we try something that might help wit...

I'd prefer no asset safety personally.

And limits on hangar capacity in upwell structures.

And no more tethering, only mooring for supercapitals.

And supercapitals not being able to dock in structures.

And limits on number of supercaps that can moor at a structure.

But that's just me...

I'll have you know, I'm all natural.

Pretty much.

In all honesty, I don't feel like I have a job.

I just do something awesome that I enjoy and happen to get paid for.

You should file a support ticket and outline what happened - where they can, the GM Team are more than happy to help :)

Yup!

Fixed!

This is something that I've been championing for many years (since 2007 in fact, when Veto, my former Corporation lost one of our members, DarkElf) and a couple of the amazing guys from the art team took on the concept work for it earlier this year.

We often get requests from corps, alliances and individuals to put monuments or tributes into the game environment for specific people, but we'd rather keep a level playing field and have a single site that's dedicated to everyone loved and lost.

I gave the art team the name "The Eternal Cyno" and this is what they came up with - it looks even better at full res with all the effects running and stuff.

There's a LOT of people within CCP who've since added touches and suggestions to it, and it's looking amazing so far.

I'm a little sad that it's made it's way to SiSi's file structure already, as I was hoping to keep it for the opening ceremony in Berlin, but it's good that it's being received positively.