JagexRowley

It wasn't only with Sliske's Endgame. We've experimented with replayable quests a number of times over the years, and using a number of different approaches. The results have always been very few players actually replaying, nowhere near enough to justify the additional work required to make quests replayable (in one experiment, barely breaking double digits). It is not ideal, but lower level quests are at least easy enough to reach on a new account. I wouldn't say it will never happen (we may experiment again at some point), but I also wouldn't suggest holding out any hope that it will.

You have to deal around 20k damage to Yaka in mirage phase to unlock the second track.

Apologies if someone else already answered with this, but you can use practice mode to unlock both Yakamaru I and II (without needing to have defeated Durzag). To unlock II you need to deal ~20k damage in the mirage phase, which you can skip to in practice mode. I'm only suggesting that this method works. It's a workable fallback if you can't achieve this via grouping.

Well, no bans yet...

Experience is knowing that however we categorised it, someone would point it out.

I'm fairly certain it is grammatically acceptable.

And also not a bug, it's how magic beans work. Sometimes you don't get what you expect.

This has meme potential written all over it...

Ah, that needs to be returned to one of the male students (I don't recall which), not Nick. :)

Nick, the man panning? He doesn't play an active role in that quest. And what trophy? Are you sure you mean Dig Site quest?

In the quest list, you can use the drop down menu and select "Series", which will list quests by the quest series they belong to in narrative order. :)

You've nothing to apologise for. :) T-shirt sizing of updates is an arcane method that most of us only pretend to understand (at best it gives us a rough idea, but for players it is pretty meaningless).

As you've figured out, the Hunter rebalance is not the summer update. :)

There are always updates in development that the player base is not aware of, of varying sizes, so it's not worth getting hyped up over anything until it has at least been announced, and judge each update on its own merits. Don't try to compare any update against a so-called "super secret XXL update" because nothing will be able to live up to whatever you have in your head for what such a thing might be.

Don't always take everything you read (or that an NPC tells you) at face value, especially something prefaced as a (poor) translation of a parable (of a dream) and so having questionable veracity. That's not to say there isn't some truth within it, as there could well be. That's not something that should irritate you, though.

This is my point exactly, we could totally do that if we wanted! Or maybe a talking cabbage with dreams of world domination? Or a place where three different versions of the same character exist together? Runescape is a silly game at times.

There are no rules in a fantasy universe save for the ones they create for themselves, and it's not worth getting upset over something based on it not tracking with our reality (doubly so for such an innocuous and unimportant point).

I figured. There are two crucial bits of information on that page you appear to have glossed over - Reldo's blurb at the top, and that I was the author of this piece.

Real-world rules need not apply. Gods sit in their own classification - even if one started out life as one thing, upon ascension they are no longer that thing, and are no longer beholden to any limits/rules/anatomy/whatever that may have applied to said thing.

While there is often value in basing fantastical elements of fictional universes on real-world analogues (primarily for ease of understanding on the part of the audience), doing so is not a necessity.

Was she now? Okay, I'll bite, but tell me, what would be your source for making that claim?

Quite so, and that's where the artist went.

She's a god, not a reptile, and thus can take whatever form she wishes, anatomy and reality be damned.

Perhaps because now they were finally supposed to update it, and not before now.

(I don't know this to be the case for sure, but I'd assume that, over them simply forgetting or not knowing how copyright law works.)

Read up on copyright law: https://www.copyrightlaws.com/copyright-symbol-notice-year/