RiotKingCobra

I would not say that it is off the table entirely - anything is possible - but it is pretty unlikely given the amount of work it'd take, not including time spent validating if it's even a good idea in the first place.

And to clarify, I work full time on the balance team! I'm just not a designer. I'm a quality engineer though I do collaborate super closely with designers every day. While I do not directly design and implement changes on a patch-to-patch basis, I'm usually a participant in the conversations and meetings where we discuss them!

Hi, Frajdej9x0! The tooltip not displaying 9% for ranged champions is an issue that we know we shipped this patch. Functionally, Divine Sunderer's range modifier should be working as intended. I just checked on live to be sure and it was dealing the correct amount. :)

Thanks so much for reporting this though. Means a lot that you took the time to come on here and write it up for us. :)

Hi, Monsieur-TT. Just wanted to say thanks for posting this here. I was able to reproduce the issue thanks to the repro steps you provided so a video isn't necessary. Sorry for taking a bit to get back to you! :) Appreciate the report!

We have fixes for the items that have less stats than their combined items. Should be fixed before 10.23 goes Live, and if they aren't, very shortly afterwards with a micropatch. Time to read the rest of your post! :)

Abilities that have guaranteed crits such as the second auto from Fiora's E will no longer crit. All crits are converted.

Hello! I'm currently looking into this issue and was wondering if you happened to remember how you were closing the shop. We have a known issue where closing the shop by pressing "O" (opening up the scoreboard) results in being unable to cast spells, however, we haven't seen it totally lock a player out of being able to control where they path and move.

If you have any additional info that you think may prove helpful, would love to hear from you! :)

Hey guys, sorry to hop in and kill the hype, but I think there may have been a misunderstanding or something as my conversation with him was mostly just to chat about Sol in general since I like the champion too. Definitely reached out to him since he tags me in a number of tweets about A Sol, but it was only to hear his thoughts on Aurelion and chat about the champion - as I do regularly with other Aurelion Sol mains on their Discord channel. We aren't planning to do any work on him right now.

This is insanely cool. You’re so talented!! I absolutely love the pose. Amazing work.

Hey, just wanted to hop in this thread and let you know that these are pieces of conversation I had with was having with Swain mains in their discord last year taken out of context. They are not a statement by me responding to the questions that you are claiming I responded to.

I've already posted a number of comments in the thread that you've linked, but I'd like to provide a bit of clarity in regards to the words that have been taken out of context/conversation.

Swain's rework intended to keep him powerful as a solo laner. As we (the playtest team back in the day) continued to optimize and understand Swain's strengths, we began to narrow in on where we felt was a good spot balance wise for his release, but then, we identified that he was actually quite a potent support. We then adjusted his power budget such that we had confidence that his mid lane was his optimal role. We acknowledged that Swain support was likely a viable offrole though. On release, Swain settle...

While I'm not a playtester anymore, I'm also not a designer. The only changes I've ever shipped were Swain's changes. I didn't make the Aurelion Sol changes or the Anivia ones. Was just a messenger for the Anivia ones! >.<

We did some under-the-hood modernization to the scripts of spells like Gragas Q (abilities with multi-cast or re-castable properties) - this is definitely an unintended result of that.

Definitely a bug. We'll be looking to get a fix out soon.

Noted. Will make you fix this next week. ^{_^}

This is SO cool!!! I love both of them. :D Aurelion is one of my absolute favorite champs. The colors are soooo good.

Already tweeted this, but I'll also post here: His ult on live is currently converting only 37.5%. Given his relatively balanced state, we decided to modify his tooltip to be accurate rather than change it to actually be 75%.

TLDR: His ult has been bugged this whole time and the tooltip was lying. Since he's relatively balanced we just updated the tooltip to reflect what the ult was actually doing.

I've been told that Jax's R passive never actually dealt additional damage to towers - it just played the animation. The bug fix in this case, as it's been communicated to me, is fixing that animation bug.

Heyo - Sylas' stats are correct. Stats don't scale linearly with level. If you level Sylas to 18 he'll have gained the proper amount of base stats. :)

I personally enjoy the rework more because I feel that I have more agency in fights with the repeatable MS boosts from W. I also think he’s more fun because he requires a bit more active engagement (being mindful of repeated W presses to get more damage or more MS vs just toggling the old one). During development and even when the rework hit live, I’d find myself missing the toggle at times, but now I’m pretty sold, enough so that he’ll probably compete for my most played champ of the season w Cass. Oh, and I especially love how diverse his builds and rune options have become.

Hi - I'm an A Sol main and also happen to be on the balance team. :)

Aurelion Sol is a pretty unique case of a champion. Before his mini-rework, Aurelion's 'depth' ( defined here: https://nexus.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/2017/11/champ-popularity-mixing-math-art/) was low enough that his high WR (generally around 53-55%) was more likely fueled by people just trying him and dropping him, than one tricks maining him. In other words, he was just strong and people who were trying out were winning a lot...because he was actually a 55% WR champ. Post-rework the amount of people maining him as gone up a bit, eno...

Thanks for posting this. We'll be looking into this. I suspect it may have to do with some of the UI work we did for Omnistone.