Smin1080p

Documents can be submitted at any time via PM to myself and we can pass them onto developers. We also don't expect or ask for full translations as we have French speaking members of staff.

You can PM me the reports they needed to be added too and also the proper origin of these sources will need to be provided with a link.

Everything that was properly reported via bug reports last time as far as I can see was marked as resolved. As I said, if you experience bugs, please report them

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

Most of the fully reported issues were resolved. If you still have persistent issues, please submit a report here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

EC does not count towards Arachis no.

It will alternate between AB and RB daily: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/551829-naval-enduring-confrontation-is-available-again/&tab=comments#comment-9310085

None of these have any sources to support them. You just copy / pasted a list posted by someone else earlier in this thread. It's just a list of issues. As you can see by the one report you did link, it requires a second confirmation source.

As I said, we welcome any reports and sources, but a list of issues without any supporting sources is unfortunately something we can do nothing with.

I have already answered your PM last week. We don't require "full documentation" simply further supporting evidence that detials the radars use and functions. None the less, this has nothing to do with this topic and should simply be handled via PM.

Primary data is generally always used where possible and there are declassified manuals for the F.1 family available as well as supporting secondary material.

We don't expect anyone to find anything. You are suggesting something may be incorrect, but the data we have does not show that. Therefore we will gladly review any and all repeorts with the relivant data, however if you can only find 1 source that provides the value you are trying to achieve, that's not our fault you cannot find another. Sometimes sources have conflicting values, which is why we generally go with the ones either A) confirmed by a primery level source B) multiple supporting and agreeing secondary sources.

This is not an issue. We have multiple french speaking members of staff available to translate. You are referring to one issue (Etendard radar) and that is due to a lack of clear source material on it's operations....

Common for most new unique vehciles when first uploaded to the Dev server. Never made it to the live server so the Dev server was doing exactly as it should here.

The only major thing changed after the patch went live was the extra G overload. It was was not a copy paste.

Not bug reprorted.

Incorrect. Many of the reprorts were misunderstanding the value of weight in game and the overall weight was matching several source materials including manuals.

Nothing else thus far that hasn't already been forwarded has been properly reported or backed fully with the required sources. As mentioned above, we have been following the thread. However it hasn't translated into a lot of proper reports or supported evidence.

To clarify, the F.1 was always planned this patch and was not "rushed out the door last minute" due to people complaining it wasn't on the dev server. We never officially confirmed it was going to be in this update, so if it wasn't going to make it, it wouldn't have been added. Models take months of work and are not able to just be dropped in a matter of days.

Your indeed correct we have been monitoring this thread and welcome any source backed reports. However claims of:

Are not really going to progress matters much. Especially since they are incorrect.

Its better to focus on factual information. Which we will of course review seriously.

As far as I'm aware, none are "buffed" above where they should be unless its already been noted somewhere. All radars are generally implemented based on whatever source material is available. However this question would be better directed at @k_stepanovich.

If we have some news, we will for sure make a news announcement

This can be used as a supporting source for a suggestion report, but two agreeing sources would be needed to confirm any values of an alternate firing mode.

Mostly ongoing events taking place at the moment. Should be sometime ahead.

All radars follow their historical data. If you believe one is incorrect, you can report it with the appropriate documentation.

All radars follow their historical data. If you believe one is incorrect, you can report it with the appropriate documentation.

It's acknowledged which means it's been passed. If there is any change internally the status will be reflected on that report.

Im not aware that they are work in progress or anything other than as intended. So if you think something is incorrect, please report it.

Different issues take different amounts of time depending on the verification, viability and possibly of resolving the issue. There are some issues older than 6 months and others fixed far sooner.

We are fixing issues every week with a weekly bugfix patch as well as the larger ones in major updates.

But this doesn't really have any relation to this topic.