Smin1080p

There are no plans to replace any tanks that were used in service. Additional tanks may be added, but there is no reason to replace historical vehicles.

Additional loadouts are treated as suggestions. It has already been passed to the developers and is down to them to decided if/when it may be added.

You are claiming something is incorrect, to do so, you should have some factual backing in order to submit a report. Datamines and X-rays have never been accepted. If a source(s) does not exist, then you are only going by what you feel is logically "right" and we have already passed that in the dev server / main update feedback as it was already mentioned by others. But a report will not be accepted without any kind of factual grounding.

Im aware that's not what's being raised here. Im talking about the difference in how they are modelled and reported.

This is not the same as the AIM-9J. Source material was found internally and provided here by others to support that, which you yourself did not provide. You were simply asking for it "because its compatible" with no supporting evidence for the F-104S.

Again, feedback on the ma...

For anything to be forwarded to the devs in this area, it needs to have some factual based backing that's not just a video. That is the same guidelines and standards we have for all tanks.

There is no confusion. Im well aware of what we are talking about. Im simply explaining what would be accepted and what would not be. X-ray and datamines would not be accepted. Neither would videos.

Reload relate itself is another matter and as we have already explained, is a mixture of source material and developer decided game balance. It does not need further clarification thank you.

This is the same standard that is set by the developers on all vehicles for these types of reports. I or any of the Tech Mods do not have jurisdiction on the matter. We simply follow the standards that are set by the developers and designers.

The standard for ready rack reports is set by the developers. As already explained in the Russian report, datamines / x-ray examination is not accepted by the developers. Only some form of documentation / source material would be viable for them to accept. Videos for any kind of reload calculation of any kind are not accepted and there have been many documented cases of this in the past.

Its currently an F. But the devs are reviewing if the engine is indeed correct.

The F-4F early as has already been mentioned was incapable of carrying AIM-7 and did not have any countermeasures. This was one of the defining features of the early models.

AIM-9J is clearly outlined both in the aircrafts manual and use:

You are watching The Shooting Range – a weekly show for all tankers, airmen and Captains in War Thunder.

In this episode:

Pages of History: The British Competitor for the Sherman and T-34


Tactics & Strategy: Naval Recon Aircraft


... and Metal Beasts: The American Supersonic Bomber

The War Thunder Team

We cannot go into specifics about which vehicles may get a remodel. But as we have said, we are continuing to work on newer models.

Seeing as they are a private operator using export variants, their material is also alone not really useful at all. Regardless of if they are "similar" to the Israeli C.7. More appropriate sourcing will be required.

It would depend on when you did that, but yes, it's better to write to support.

A bunch of time travelling server hamsters came to the future from before the patch came out and attempted to take over and steal Christmas. We have now apprehended them and sent them back to the past.

The issue should now be reolved. Please fully restart your clients and make sure to log out / in.

Thanks again for your patience.

Hi guys. We are aware of an issue with the vehicles from the latest update disappearing. We are working to fix this. Thanks for your understanding.

You are free to submit a historical report with any source material you have if you believe it's incorrect to support these claims.

So far nothing has been submitted to suggest what we have is incorrect.

This could be suggested as part of the report.

If the thrust for the aircraft is claimed to be incorrect, then yes, you will need the evidence to support that for us to forward it to the devs.

There have not been any reports to suggest something is wrong, so as far as im aware, nothing has been mentioned currently.