Smin1080p

To all Pilots, Tankers and Captains!

From everyone on the War Thunder Team, thank you for being with us during 2021, from the South African ground pioneers of "Ixwa Strike", through the rise of new winged beasts in "Red Skies", the vigorous Viggen of "Locked On", the entrenching of "Ground Breaking" and the roar of the "Winged Lions" to round of the year.

We have a lot more in store for 2022 and want to wish all of you a happy and safe new year!

The War Thunder Team

The blog has never claimed R-24. Only R-23:

Guys, if you have any further questions about the store, purchases, redemptions or codes, please use the offical subform as grom said above: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/603-gaijinnet-store-gaijin-market-gaijin-merch-shop-main-website-forum-live-problems-advice/

We are constantly working on new technology for all nations and trees.

VVVV

Those that got the 3 vehicles before the issue was resolved get to keep them.

There was no mix up. Plans change and nowhere did anyone say they were fully confirmed to 100% come in 2020. Only that they were within our plans for the year.

Plans can and do change.

Hello

Trophy camos on a particular vehicle are present only on that vehicle. So a Trophy camo for the M would not be present on the MF. They were created for the M and added to that aircraft before the MF was in game by War Thunder live creators.

Hello

As with most event decals, they can be traded on the marketplace. Any duplicates you receive can be traded on the market and any ones you are missing from your collection can also be obtained from the market.

The 9th decal is awarded on completion of the collection, as per most decal collections, such as the major update decals and many others.

It wasn't a mistake:

and as I said:

There was no set planned date for Chinese helicopters and no mention of them being delayed. All we said was they were within our plans and plans very often can change.

Anything else you have heard has been made up. When we have something offical to say on something in development, we will do so via the news for everyone to see.

Only the 7 days received in error from the code was removed. Nobody lost 7 days that they purchased.

Due to the thrust vectoring, the missiles require initial launch inertia. This is a historical feature of the missile.

Its a bug and a fix is on its way. Just there are a few stacks of builds queued up from over the holidays with lots of hotfixes and improvements. Unfortunately it's a side effect of a previous issue with all the other AIM-9D/G carriers that also had the erroneous 4G overload limit.

Let's remove the tinfoil hats please

We would like to thank each and every one of you in our community for sticking with us and playing War Thunder throughout 2021, it's been a tough year, and we appreciate all of you for spending time with us.

From everyone here on the War Thunder Team, we wish you a Merry Christmas and happy holidays, keep warm, be healthy, and we’ll see you next year!

The War Thunder Team

It is Christmas Eve my dude, we just had the last major only 1 week ago. Little too early to be digging.

Its within the last Q and A video. Not a written one.

They were removed to streamline research at a time when the Soviet and German trees were being drastically expanded in certain areas. They were also basically identical vehicles within the same tree. Whereas you are comparing this to similar / variants across multiple trees.

As BVV explained in the last Q & A, each tree is treated independently of the others. So because there is a Sherman in one, does not mean there cannot be a Sherman in another.

There is no reason to create new or additional rules when historical vehicles exist to be included in the tree.

Again, your personal opinion on this is well documented. So there is no reason to re run this discussion yet again. I was simply explaining that there are no plans or reason to changes said plans to remove any of the historically used vehicles of Italy.

You are also fighting prototypical / experimental vehicles that never saw combat in any form, on locations where they never met with nations that also did not fight directly side by side. So they are actually more historical than most of those other matters that are also big parts of the game and always will be.

Among those ranks there are also a plethora of other domestic vehicles within the matchmaker and the question about decompressing Battle Ratings was regarding top tier, not the middle ranks.

I have already previously explained this. It is not a game bug so is not a bug report. To submit a historical report, then you need historical documentation or source material with something factually grounded. If it is neither of those two things, then it is a suggestion, one that has already been passed in the main update feedback.

I had already previously said this:

There is no factual backing to support this. Purely your opinion. Those tanks are not diminishing or preventing the popularity of the Italian tree from rising. Since they were added, there has been a positive impact from them.

You do not have to play any of the vehicles you do not wish to. You can unlock them, simply not crew them and move onto something else. Because you personally do not enjoy / want the...

We already passed the suggestion as one of you (I can't recall who exactly) mentioned it both during Dev server and update feedback. So they are aware.

There is no reason for them to be removed. All nations have vehicles they historically used. Additionally not everyone shares the same point of view with you on that. So it's not a good idea to speak for everyone.