Smin1080p

This is incorrect. A separate Tech Mod took over the report as the report became too convoluted and the required info was not displayed clearly. The new moderator asked you for exactly what was required and you did not respond. Therefor the report was closed.

I mean:

So perhaps best to wait for full and proper information rather than assumptions about one part of a sentence

The mode is still in development and no details have been confirmed yet at all.

In general helicopters are not suited to direct PvP in many cases unlike aircraft, ships and tanks. Inherently they are supporting units. Some have far greater offensive capabilities than others. Helicopter EC has also not been ignored. A lot of suggestions and ideas were explored, but most of them would have larger negative consequences on the mode than benefits. Player numbers don't allow for any further breakdown in matchmaking such as BR splits, so a lot of the ideas put forward simply were not viable to implement. A lot of feedback for example on the maps and gameplay was worked on and direct towards the implementation of the City map, which generally tends to be the most suited to PvP and the most well received. But in general. PvE will solve a lot of the issues and concerns raised in feedback.

Once again, this is not how repair costs are changed. They are not manually adjusted to limit how frequently or infrequently something appears. They are a direct result of the economical earnings of the specific vehicle. If the MLD proves to have high earnings in the next economical review, then it will increase, if not it wont. It functions the same for all vehicles and is not artificially manipulated for game balance, but a natural reflection of the vehicles economics.

Repair cost has nothing to do with the gameplay balance of a vehicle. Repair cost is related to the economical earnings of the aircraft.

It is entirely illogical to give what is already the best performing Rank VII aircraft even better missiles and weaponry no matter how they are performing on other existing aircraft. If the MLD is already top as it is, it does not need to be pushed even further ahead.

One is a tank functionality and one is an aircraft countermeasure system. Two entirely different matters, handled by different teams.

The MLD is currently the best performing aircraft of Rank VII. Regardless of what reason or opinion you have on why that is, it is currently in no need of any better weaponry.

We can pass them for consideration. Unfortunately its not down to me as what's sufficient.

Flare dispensers are not Dozer Blades.

Whataboutism for an aircraft flare dispenser vs an entirely unrelated tank matter is not going to change the developers decision. We have already explained the F-5 countermeasure case. Tank Dozer blades are not related in the slightest.

Unfortunately, that's not the truth of the situation.

The MLD is currently the top of the stats for Rank VII.

Perhaps on paper, but in actuality all of them are behind the MiG-23MLD.

The MiG-23MLD is currently the highest aircraft in efficiency at Rank VII. Whilst it remains as the top performer, it is in absolutely no need of any better weaponry or loadouts.

R-60M was not introduced for this exact reason.

Whilst it remains the top aircraft, it will not be receiving R-60M as its current loadouts are evidently more than sufficient.

We have already confirmed we are working on a PvE mode for helicopters.

We are not going to provide a timeframe for something thats not even close to happening in the next major update or in general. Plans can change and we generally do not speak about any plans, no matter what it is, more than 1 major in advance. So what your asking for is not possible to give any form of direct answer on. Right now, we are focused on Israeli aviation.

We currently don't have enough info supporting the Chieftain 5 and 10 getting the blade.

This report was rejected by the developers as the 2-3 photos are considered insufficient. Detailed references that confirm the compatibility:

Similarly, the developers currently dont have sufficent info to show the Type 74 G should get the blade as there is documentation that mentions it, but no photographic evidence to support it:

More detailed and backed up information is required in both cases.

Dozer blades have not been added yet to all tanks in game that can currently have them. Its already known and planned for Challenger 2 to receive a blade in a future update.

Almost all of the Russian vehicles that received a blade had them already on their 3D model as they wer...

It was planned already for the next batch of written questions, but BVV will most likely answer some/most of them on the video one too.

Stay tuned to the next Q & A.

Still in development. When/if we have some further details to share, we will.

It shares commonality with the F.6 model and weponary. We don't have a British FGA.9 so it's just a result of the CDK amalgamation of the Hunters.

Not this year.