Smin1080p

The OP of the topic requested it to be hidden.

If you wish, you can create a new topic for it and I can split off the rest of the posts (except the OP) and merge them into your new one.

That does not really detract from the point that the AJ is supposed to be an attacker and the prior comparison to modern fighters is rather meaningless.

This report was marked as fixed:

Just to point out, the whole purpose of the AJ is an attacker. Not a fighter. The fact it can carry RB24J / AIM-9J at all is a defensive bonus. Its not supposed to be defined by its air-to-air capacity.

Any AJ Viggen is not supposed to compete with them. Its an attacker, not a fighter.

Comparing an attack aircraft with a bunch of fighters is not really the correct comparison to be making.

Right now, we have only announced that we are working on an Israeli air tree for one of the future War Thunder updates.

Stay tuned to the news in the future, if we have anything new to announce, we will do so via news / dev blogs or developer Q&As.

We currently do not have ready-made crew models for the Bundeswehr. Also due to the fact that the mobility of the crew models in the game is limited, unlike reality, in the case of the tight Wiesel space, this can greatly limit the guidance angles even more so than the M113. But the addition of a crew member for the launcher is planned. But everything will depend on how the human model fits in there.

Scouting is present due to their role on reality.

Apologies, apparently I need some more Red Bull in my morning coffee.

I've asked the lead tank designer and will forward the response.

Nobody is in denial or dismissing anyone's opinion. We are here to present the facts and make it clear that on the changes listed within the major update changelog , there were no direct income changes based on those spesific factors change in terms of RP or SL.

What yourself and others are claiming is a different matter entirely regarding perceived indirect changes. Which nobody has dismissed, simply that as of right now there is not enough evidence to really show anything in a clear way that can be investigated.

The "Gaijin bad' mentality is also not helping the points being raised here. We have been following the topic since it's creation and monitoring both the feedback present. As mentioned already, there currently is insufficient evidence to investigate further so far. But the constant questioning of "Do you even play?" When clearly, we all care about and play the game.

All vehicles receive a initial BR on launch, then after some time if statistical collection, we have a BR update. If the stats then show a change is needed, it will be proposed.

In order to fix it, we would first need the evidence to show what's actually wrong and your sources to show how its incorrect. Unfortunately there is nothing of substance here we can forward onto the developers to review.

If you have evidence to suggest its wrong and have conducted proper tests to show the current flight performance is incorrect, please submit a historical report here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1955-flight-model-damage-model/

China is one of the nation's I'm currently researching though. I play all nations and work through all trees

Indeed. As we have already said, if people wish to submit primary sources via a historical report we can forward it on for review. But right now, the current naming convention for it was confirmed by primary documentation provided by our Chinese consultant.

So another discussion about it here is not going to change that.

All developers generally play too. I research all vehicles trees myself.

You were given a decoration as stated, however duplicates were possible and in those cases you could exchange duplicates for bonds.

The ability to exchange all duplicated from this event for Warbonds has been added today. Follow the item in your inventory and you can exchange it there.

The Halloween hanger has already been removed and replaced with the standard hanger once again. Seasonal hangers are of course, seasonal

You can see for yourself: https://warthunder.com/en/community/userinfo/?nick=Smin1080p_Tech&__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_zQaFPIWr0NDhYwFeRzFRiBWysxeKFIWh6.kTYnKosjE-1635884981-0-gqNtZGzNAnujcnBszQnl

All of us Community Mangers play.

Comments are not being deleted where constructive discussion is taking place. Rule breaking posts however, as per the forum rules will be removed and warned.

Please do not twist our responses.

Nobody has been called or treated as such. We explained in detail in the changelog what changed this major update and made clear that it did not effect SL / RP i...

As well as the Magic being generally the superior missile, Jaguar A also has 252 countermeasures (one of the highest in game) compared to the 60 on the GR.1A thats also worth factoring in.

But the GR.1A is still new and very well could change depending on how it does. Its not just about raw comparisons of the vehicles themselves, but how they actually perform in battle.

Nothing off topic about an F-84F removal discussion. We haven't said anything other than its being replaced in the French tree.

What is off topic is when the discussion turns into a opinionized personal debate about how much someone likes/dislikes it being added in the first place, that it should have been a skin etc, followed by more off topic and moderation challenging by those who very much know by now what a post being hidden means, but decide to push the limits anyway.

Thats all been done when it was added for the French tree and can be continued in a French F-84F topic in the relevant area. This isn't the place and we don't need 3 pages of spam.

Standard forum rules apply. So if someone repeatedly does it, they will be warned.

Nobody is imagining things. Every year things fall on different days.

We have never had a week like this where the major came out right before the weekend and when the actual day of the anniversary was not even in the same week.