Smin1080p

Logistically we can't do that every Q&A. Often the most common questions asked have been answered several times before.

We also don't just want to make it about a popular vote, otherwise smaller areas and communities within the game don't get covered.

Questions are taken from everywhere and all platforms. Website comments, forum topics, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and WT live for life example.

Voting on what questions is not the best if ideas. We want the Q&As to cover a wide range of topics and areas. Not "wHen f-14/MiRAgE f.1/mIg-29???" Every few months.

Hello

Your bug reports are not being ignored. After every major update, we receive a massive influx of reports. Our moderators aim to forward as many issues as possible as soon as possible, but it is not always achievable to reach them all within a given timeframe.

It has nothing to do with how difficult they may or may not be to fix, as Technical Moderators have no influence over that and their role is solely to forward things onto the developers. Not make a judgement on its viability or timeframe for a fix.

We ask for your patience and understanding as we work through the current log of reports. Providing they have all met the requirements, they will be dealt with in due course.

Smin

Yes actually I'm looking forward to the F-4F I don't currently have ))))))

Im enjoying the SPS-K

Should be reasonably soon. The dust is just settling from the Major and Anniversary

Guys lets not slip into unrelated nations that are not present in game and have not been announced at all for future updates. We just announced a new nation and that's Israel. Not Iran or a Commonwealth tree.

Neither of these images prove at all that guns are mounted here. Almost all offical documentation and manuals for these aircraft state that the guns are removed.

When you have evidence to prove this, it can be forwarded and reviewed. These images are not evidence of that. Particularly when there is clear primary documentation saying otherwise.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Instructions_for_the_user_localizations

Dev Server reports are stored in the respective dev server sections. Once an update is released, only TMs can see them.

You can create custom interface names if you want to do that.

No gap filling or historical vehicle is ever really a waste of resources.

Plus personally id love to see it as I have a personal project of one to make

But ultimately it comes down to developer and designer decision and what's needed most.

Not planned. Peace Rhine is not an offical name or variant. We don't plan to change the current naming which more accurately represents the variants present.

No part of any tree is ever a closed chapter, but we are not going to confirm any new vehicles outside of a dev blog or offical announcement

Im not sure why you think the number of posts on the forum is any meaningful metric for what people actually play in the game. The forum is less than 2-5% of the playerbase population and its more than possible for less than 10 people to sustain a topic for more than 20+ pages. This one for example is maintained by a small but dedicated group. Forums are a place of discussion, and thats something the Italian community do a lot here on the forum.

Not only this, but Japanese and Chinese players also have other platforms where discussions are generally held. So when you remove those and look at the remaining nations left that have nations in game, you still get the same result anyway:

But the number of posts is a really meaningless factor in the number of players playing the nation in game.

Any further East German vehicles will continue to go in the German tree. Thats not going to change.

We dont have an ETA. Historical matters that require source review take time to confirm if the source is correct.

Except the German Phantom was not only able too, but did:

It's also taken on a case by cases basis. But feel free to make a suggestion for it.

This is a temporary side effect of the ongoing server matters: https://warthunder.com/en/news/7411-news-technical-issues-over-the-past-weekend-en

As @Bruce_R1correctly pointed out, the matchmaker currently prioritizes creating stable game at the very least, rather than no battles at all. This will be returned to normal when the severs are stable.

@Flame2512 Topics split and merged.

I have restored all the content and made your post the OP. It may require some further moderation (clean-up of posts etc), so please PM me if further changes are needed.

A Lancaster can face a Bf 109, but it doesn't mean the Lancaster should be compared on its ability to shoot down aircraft vs the 109. This is a completely meaningless comparison as the aircraft have different roles. The AJ 37 is an attacker. Not a fighter.

The AJS is also later than the AJ, which we have only just received. Sweden has very few top jets left at all and the AJ was the next logical step. There was never any chance we would jump right to the AJS. The AJ is perfectly adequate and if it somehow transpires that its not performing well at its current BR, thats exactly what the dynamic BR system is for.

Any fighter in game can "obliterate" any attacker or bomber in game. Thats nothing exclusive to the AJ 37 and again a rather meaningless comparison. Its an attack aircraft, designed to attack ground targets.

...

We would need some sort of solid confirmatory source on this. The devs wont change it without a source.

We currently don't have asymmetrical loadout combinations involving 1 missile / countermeasure pod on lots of aircraft that could hypothetically do so.