devtrackers.gg
Yes. Same time as the CCIP.
Yes. Same time as the CCIP.
Because this isn't a bug report or even the area to report issues
Bug reports go here please: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1973-ground-vehicles/
We have no further open issues reported to us. If you believe there are further issues, please submit a bug report in the relevant area. Everything that was reported to us on the A-129CBT has now been fixed.
The only suggestion open at the moment is the question of weapons placement for AAMs on the inboard pylons, which requires further conformation and review:
Being able to get the next pass for free was a heavily requested feature now present in this pass.
Toldi was a mistake in the blog. Nothing was replaced. P-39 is the free reward.
https://warthunder.com/en/news/7150/current/
What’s new?
Free Battle Pass
You could get free access to the next, 4th Battle Pass by completing enough stages in the current “Strength Athletics” season!
How does it work? Battle Pass rewards include “Upgrade for a vehicle coupon” - this season, for example, they appear at levels 105 and 125. These upgrades can be applied to previously received coupons for season vehicles so that they become tradable on the Market, or you can combine both improvements and get a full Battle Pass for the next season. This can be don
Will be fixed in a future update.
France and Italy haven't had a BP pass vehicle yet, both of these are cool and unique in their own ways, Voroshilov is a famous Soviet ship with historical significance and the M6A2E1 is the big chonker of the show.
That this BP will have another cool new development (Not a vehicle) not yet talked about ))
Stay tuned to the news.
We dont have any new news to share on it right now.
We dont need to estimate. Its fully covered in documentation. There is more information on the M6A2E1s extra plate than there is on the Celere Saharianos plate which was just estimated from a photo.
It was never fitted because the trials didn't require it and the tank never saw any combat because it was cancelled before that. That doesn't mean we dont have everything required to accurately model the tank as it was intended to be just like the Celere Sahariano.
The M6A2E1 was built in full. It was never given its additional frontal protection plate because there was no need to as it wasn't going to see combat or be used in trials that called for it.
We have a fully built tank and all the required information to recreate its additional plate as it was intended to be along with all the necessary performance data to model that accurately too.
The P.43 by comparison was never built at all. Nothing left the paper except the engine.
Those are two entirely different matters.
We don't require this for the developers to consider suggested additional weaponry. I already answered this before unless there is a conflict of sources.
The photo aided in estimation. There was no clear evidence and it was still very much that, estimation. Its an interpretation, the best possible, but still just that.
Meanwhile there is documentation, detailed schematics and drawings clearly defining the additional plate on the M6A2E1 showing it would have been added but simply was not as it as pointless in testing.
Those situations are the same
As I explained above, we don't require a photograph of a specific missile fitted as proof to add it. If we did, half the aircraft in game would loose their ordinance, including many Italian aircraft.
We have the offical manual shows it can as well as the fact the aircraft mounted the AIM-9J shows it can mount the J and E.
On top of this, we have the German F-4Fs in the USA mounting the AIM-9J as proof.
So we know the tank had a gun and engine, thats a good start, but its not even remotely close to the M6A2E1.
We don't expect to have it this week. Beyond that we dont have an ETA for the time being
If the developers had any further comment to add, it would have been done in the last Q and A with that question
Im not sure why this is still used as an example, as not only is it not related but:
If we used this metric as a measure of requiring a photo to fit or fire something, you would hurt Italy a lot more than help it.
We also have picture of a claimed track link from the O-I tank, it doesn't mean we can add it as a result:
The M6A2E1 was a fully built and completed tank. All we have done is given it the additional armour plate on top on the frontal slope that it was always planned to have, but was just not fitted for testing and trials because its entirely unnecessary.
Comparing a fully built tank that has an additional plate attached to the front that was planned to something not built at all and never left paper whatsoever does not compare.
There is actually more data (in terms of raw numbers) on the tank in its fully intended complete form with the extra plate than there is
I can't remember that being said anywhere that every single vehicle in the battlepass would be premium, simply that if would include premium vehicles. Which it does.
This is the first time we have had higher rank ship of this kind in the BP.
It's not a mistake. Higher tier & rank reward ships are generally non-premium with a few exceptions.