Im not sure what you are referring too. I was teasing the Yak-38M, which was not previously leaked, shown via dev blog or known about.
I never said it was a ground vehicle.
Im not sure what you are referring too. I was teasing the Yak-38M, which was not previously leaked, shown via dev blog or known about.
I never said it was a ground vehicle.
Check again. Just in weaponary alone there is a significant difference. Let alone avionics and performance.
Regardless. As I said, we are only just introducing gen 1 VTOL into the game. Italy doesn't get to queue jump a whole generation just because it never had Gen 1s.
It is when people keep thinking they are going to somehow get a Gen II Harrier at a time when we are only just introducing the first VTOL generation into the game.
AV-8B is the equal to the Harrier GR.5/7/9 not 1/3.
I'm aware of both of those.
My understanding was that G works differently in that regard to how the E and J currently slave and did so in a different manor that we don't have in game yet (at least this was the reason I understood) but I've raised it with the consultants.
It may just be they can already, just try Jaguar can't do it as it has no Radar of the right kind.
Nobody is getting an AV-8B at all this patch. USA is getting AV-8A & C. AV-8B is a gen II Harrier.
Italy never had Gen 1 Harriers and thus isn't getting any for now.
We don't have this functionality on Sidewinders of any kind yet.
Module and functionality was already present, visual model has also now been corrected.
The tree split has literally nothing to do with BRs. We are not compressing any BRs as a result of this change.
Yes, but was closed with more recent sources that show 16.5G is correct:
D and G have identical overloads.
))))
Im neither of those
At the moment, they dont have any extras at this point. But its a bit too early to say for sure.
War Thunder was scheduled and is still scheduled for release on Xbox Series X as a launch title. We made no promise or statement that New Power would be released on the same day as the launch on Xbox.
A general intention to do something and the reality of games development are two very different things. Could we absolutely have rushed a major out in time for tomorrow if we really wanted? Sure. But then the same people now saying "its easily doable" are also the same ones complaining that not enough gets fixed.
The first Dev server didnt even have the T-90, remaining 3 Harriers and some other things that were not yet finished.
No, the update is not ready to come out tomorrow.
No. The minor patch tomorrow is not the major update.
You just complained we dont fix enough bugs before releasing a major update and are now complaining we are not rushing out a major update just to bring it out on console launch day.
The two are very contradictory here?
No Dev today guys.
Good example actually, 1.97 last year, we had exactly 8 bugs reported all fixed before release. Generally, the bugs correctly reported get resolved.
Huge difference between actual bugs and historical matters that need investigation and review. We are not going to delay a whole update because something is missing a bomb or a rocket is incorrect.
Not correct at all. As I said, most of the time, the actual bugs reported and fixed before release.
Hi. Last update I had was that a few more things needed resolving. I dont have an ETA on when we can expect it next, but most likely not this side of New Power as all hands are on deck for that at the moment.
There is a lot more to choosing which vehicles get considered to the game, how and when actually. But thats another matter not for this topic and its very clear you have your own personal interpretation of things.
Its under review by the developers.
Im more into aircraft to be perfectly honest. Being British, I should probably say CR2, but I have to say, the Strv 122 has me progressing up the Swedish tree mostly now towards it