Smin1080p

Guys, final warning. Take it to PM, the correct area or the topic gets a cooldown lock and warnings start getting issued.

Dont just carry on an off topic debate after I asked for it to be stopped and moved.

AV-8s currently have AIM-9G just like Harrier GR.3.

Guys, can we please take the off topic "X nation suffers" discussions to the correct place: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/494-ground-forces-discussion/

We are not getting a new US MBT and as I have already said, new shells for both the British and America are not currently planned but may be considered by the developers once a clearer picture is present.

Right now, none of this is on topic.

No new Abrams or MBT. We would have said something already.

We already said this is not happening with the S2 for now. Leclerc is strong enough as it is for the time being.

Maybe just because its the weekend and this may come as a shock, but im not just sat in this topic 24/7

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

No dev today at least as far as im aware.

As Mustang has already said, we already have and the current presented materials are insufficent for a change.

Please submit a report with your evidence here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1957-weapons-and-ordnance/

This isnt the place to report an issue.

If its updates to your model, here is the best place: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/164-videos-screenshots-fan-art/

This

These proposed trees (and they were just that, proposals only) are long outdated and should not be referred too. Thats not to say that some aircraft wont ever make an appearance, for example like the P-51C and P-47 Razerbacks last patch, but this was back in the days when ground forces were in their infancy and we didn't have Rank VI, VII, Helicopter or Naval.

I can confirm this was the error message displayed when the 4000 player cap was turned on during the last dev server. We had a huge number of people attempting to play at once.

Right now there is not one. It's down to the developers to decide on M829A1 or any new shells for anything and it's not always possible before the patch without seeing the actual statistics and balance on the live server with full population, not just on paper opinions or test server perspectives.

This wasn't strictly necessary as I already said, both the Devs and consultants were already aware and working on the matter. It's more a case of time as there are also other aircaft awaiting flares too.

But we can forward it anyway.

Definitely don't expect it to have either of these on lunch. We already clarified why R-60M is not necessary or needed right now. In future it's possible. But considering we also don't have AIM-9L on the aircraft that should have them, don't expect these right now either.

Leclerc S.1 in game as it currently stands is already one of the most advanced and powerful tanks we had in game. The primary problem people faced with it is it had to lineup backup. The S.2 corrects this. Right now it's not in need of any new shells. But as with always we can always expand its arsenal not just in shells too in future if it's nee...

We dont have a separate dev client for Linux, Mac, PS4 or Xbox.

Not sure what year in the future you think your in, but the game is just celebrating its 8th year and ground forces only really joined in 2013/14, so that's 7/6 years at best.

We also never indicated ground would ever get an EC mode.

What Buccaneer? ))

Hello!

This matter is currently known to the developers already and they are aware of this.

Thank you for the report

AV-8A wont be a pre-order as far as im aware. It will just be available on launch day. We also dont plan to do any more Harrier blogs, since we covered it all in the Harrier blog already.

Thats not the case at all. Yak 141 was armed, Vak 191 was not. So Vak 191 wont be coming to the game ever.

Yak 141 certainly is not coming anytime soon as its a closer analogue to the Gen II Harriers, not the Gen I thats coming now.

So I dont know why it keeps coming up here.