ekimarcher

Originally posted by Aurorac123

So what you're saying is if you supplied the actual data it would be better? No matter what happens, people will try and work out the chances, because we're playing an arpg in 2023, not 2000. So unless you're just gonna sticky your own comments to any reddit post trying to work it out saying it's wrong, without giving any indication if its too high, or too low, this is the reality of making a game with loot drops.

I get your point, but it feels like the first implementation of the covenant system in WoW. The devs had their game design ideas about why it was good, those were tied to beliefs about how people interacted with games in the past. Then what happened is it turned out people play games differently now, and by designing around something from the past, the players didn't enjoy it as much.

You can certainly make an arpg thats like it came out in the year 2000, but I think the interest in last epoch probably means that's not so sensible, people want to play...

Read more

Originally posted by Aurorac123

Your sad that people playing your game worked out drop rates for items? Lol.

Also this 'But if the stars align and someone does eventually manage to get lucky, it will be a really cool event to talk about' is the *exact* reasoning d4 devs gave behind uber uniques drop rates. Anyway, see you in season 2 when we get a boss to target farm high lp off of.

Originally posted by Glibandor_Sigyr

Does sealed experimental affixes work for LP?

Originally posted by veradar

Sorry, I didn’t witness the drop. Is the area relevant for LP? Just saw his youtube video where he crafted apathy’s maw. (Just realized it’s an axe not hammer)

Originally posted by Narroh

Quick question, If you’re at liberty or desire to answer by the way. Is there any plan for a system parallel to LP/Weaver’s for set items?

I love some of the set items but I often struggle to justify building around the cooler ones (looking at you, Gaspar’s) in leu of choosing uniques that allow me to push my build further.

Personally I think Weaver’s Will is a great system that would adapt well to Sets, giving you the option to push the item further without selectively min-maxing like a 3/4LP can do.

Originally posted by Narroh

Speaking of which, mad respect for y’all allowing for that legendary (pun intended) chance of a truly god tier 4LP drop on near any unique. Makes every one that drops just that much more exciting to see!

Originally posted by Knifiel

And if they use some formula instead of hardcoded values for level 100 zones, they even have elegant solution for this - make corruption increase effective zone level by, say, corruption/10. So at 1000 corruption you'd be considered as being in level 200 zone instead of 100.

Originally posted by veradar

Raxx found the hammer with 1 LP. Is that 0,007%?

Originally posted by frasidark

so the carrot isn't on the Moon is on Pluto right.

These numbers for some items looks like uber uniques in D4.

Also if you guys redeem it "not correct" how about giving us the correct numbers.

Originally posted by DarkBiCin

Does this mean it will function the same for rings?

Originally posted by Mind_Is_Empty

I've been scouring the game to see if there are any NPCs that move and block player movement while online, and I've found one.

The rabbits in The Old Road block movement and shove the player out of the way while in online mode. Would it be possible to have a boss use the same behavior as the rabbit?

If there's some sort of code voodoo that lets the rabbit work while copying it elsewhere makes it fail, is it possible to enlarge a rabbit until its collision radius is the same as a boss, turn it invisible, and have it update its position to be standing directly on top of the boss at any given frame?

Originally posted by Overthinks_Questions

Can you give any more detail on the services they provide? Obviously, they are a sales and marketing platform, but I wondered if they support you in other ways

Originally posted by Plebbit-User

Although I applaud you for sticking by your design, I come from another game that hid behind "data" and I always hated that because those were bad decisions and the consensus against them was enormous but we were always told "prove it".

As if the user is supposed to justify their positions as if they're a research firm. If you're gonna cite data, you should be transparent with it. Not particularly invested in the campaign skip though I would like for idol slots to be a one time thing for the sake of rushing campaign which is already an ordeal seasonally.

I would just hate for this lack of transparency to be used as a fallback position on a subject I care more about.

Originally posted by Acedin

Thanks for wrangling the screaming toddler in a calm and collected way. The way he behaves he didn't deserve it, you did put in the time anyway. Thank you.

Originally posted by LeMonarq

While it's often tempting to put stock into all forms of feedback, it might be prudent to weigh the credibility of contributors, especially when their responses might be slightly less than articulate or perhaps fall victim to more than just unfortunate autocorrect mishaps ("alot"). I'll move on.

Reflecting on the unlocking of idol slots, although there are ample wow moments within the game, these particular unlocks might not carry the same palpable impact when unlocked individually. An alternative perspective - providing a notable power spike through instant access to all idol slots for new characters, still honors the player’s initial efforts and maintains the spirit of earning rewards.

The monolith compromise seems fair enough. Integrating idol slot unlocks with more enjoyable content solves the core issue. Although sidequests provide a novel experience initially, their allure can wane in repeated runs, where the enticing call of the endgame beckons louder.

...

Read more