War Thunder Dev Tracker

Ground vehicles

A bug has been fixed where uninstalled modifications were visible in xray mode in the hangar.


TOW-2B

- trajectory clearance over the guidance line has been increased from 1 to 2.25 metres (report)


BR-240SP

- the description of the round in the info card has been supplemented with the ballistic cap info (rеport)

Aircraft

A bug has been fixed that caused the sight to shift forward to target when switching from optical sight to turret control.


A bug has been fixed that prevents weapon jettison via the multifunctional menu.


F-4 Phantom (all versions)

— an issue with a twitching animation of the opening chute bay in online battles has been solved.


AU-1

- the colour of the pylons has been corrected on the "Miss Penny" ca...

Ground vehicles

A bug has been fixed where uninstalled modifications were visible in xray mode in the hangar.


TOW-2B - trajectory clearance over the guidance line has been increased from 1 to 2.25 metres (report)


BR-240SP - the description of the round in the info card has been supplemented with the ballistic cap info (rеport)

Aircraft

A bug has been fixed that caused the sight to shift forward to target when switching from optical sight to turret control.


A bug has been fixed that prevents weapon jettison via the multifunctional menu.


F-4 Phantom (all versions) — an issue with a twitching animation of the opening chute bay in online battles has been solved.


AU-1 - the colour of the pylons has been corrected on the "Miss Penny" camo.


A...

Hello.

Firstly this is an unoffical website, as stated by them:

Secondly, the 50G figure is likely the combined plane figure, as has already been established. There simply is not enough evidence to support how the missile would achieve 50G overload.

Im not sure what there is to read over. It looks like a copy from Wikipedia or a book of some kind listing the general armament of the Ja 37D.

Its all already in game except RB99 / AMRAAM, which is too advanced to be added currently and ECM jamming pods, which a multitude of aircraft already in game could also carry, but we dont yet have any form of ECM pods for aircraft yet.

Full details will be published when the aircraft move. As its mentioned, we will make a separate news post about it.

Already posted 4 hours ago

Welcome and yes it will.

F-4J for now. For helicopters, on those that used it maybe. But not this patch as far as im aware.

One of two map available in rotation.

The vehciles are not yet ready to be placed for testing yet. As the Dev server is due to close tomorrow, it may not be this week. As for position, that will be a little clearer when they are in place.

https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/569898-testing-news/

AFAIK we still did not changed our mind and do not plan to bring back mentioned vehicles, sorry.

Some of you have already tried the latest Dev version of War Thunder and shared your impressions and opinions on the forum. We have studied your feedback and made two important decisions we are going to tell you about.

Changes in ranks for aircraft

In the Apex Predators update we will add several new aircraft of rank VIII. And 30 days after the release of the update we will move some aircraft of rank VII to rank VIII: : F-14A, MiG-23MLA, MiG-23MLD, MiG-27K, Harrier GR.7 and Mirage 2000C-S5. Also the F-104S will be moved from rank VI to rank VII. If you are currently researching these vehicles make sure you get them before transferring to another rank as you will need to open a new vehicle rank to research them afterwards.

R-73 missiles for MiG-29

MiG-29 will not receive R-73 missiles in the Apex Predators update. There are two reasons for our decision.

New location for Ground Battles. This time we have created an alternate, winter version of well known Poland map. Please leave feedback after you test it on.

Russia already has a suitable top tier SPAA. China did not. This patch, Russia gets it's more needed mid/high rank SPAA that was much more requested.

This has been answered more times than almost any other question this patch.

If you think an aircraft is missing an loadouts and have evidence to support that, please feel free to make a report and we can check it out. Similarly with FM issues, a report is welcome. But I can't do anything with statements about an aircraft only just added for initial testing and nothing to support the cliams.

It's a premium aircraft. There are so many options available to every nation, and the premium for every nation follow the same sort of trends that define aircraft of that nation at or around that rank.

I'm not even sure what this question is. Those nations have some of the larger player bases and thus player interests in the game, coupled with a far larger vehicle pool of possible vehciles to introduce.

I understand. It has R-24 and countermeasures, but as I said it's not getting R-73.