War Thunder Dev Tracker

Hey folks! You are watching Thunder Show - redesigned and redefined!

We will no longer limit you and ourselves to strict categories, yeah, we got rid of them! Now we’ll feature only the best videos of the week. You can find our new and simplified terms of participation at the end of this episode.

Oh and by the way - we’re expanding Thunder Show to FIVE videos per episode! As for the rest - it’s business as usual! You are watching Thunder Show, a weekly project of which you can be a part of! New episode every Friday!

From the article:

Check this directories:

WarThunder\cache\content
WarThunder\cache\contentUGC

Erroneous underestimation of HE impact of aircraft missiles has been fixed.


A hint that you need to destroy enemy aircraft to unlock new ones has been added to the interface in selecting aircraft for participation in the

“TailSpin” event.


A bug where the “Sly Duck” aircraft wasn't being given out in the “TailSpin” event has been fixed. All players who have unlocked this aircraft will have it available for flight in the event.


Battle Pass challenges “Sol lucet omnibus” and “Bellum omnium contra omnes” now permits inclusion also from streak aviation in tank a

Erroneous underestimation of HE impact of aircraft missiles has been fixed.


A hint that you need to destroy enemy aircraft to unlock new ones has been added to the interface in selecting aircraft for participation in the “TailSpin” event.


A bug where the “Sly Duck” aircraft wasn't being given out in the “TailSpin” event has been fixed. All players who have unlocked this aircraft will have it available for flight in the event.


Battle Pass challenges “Sol lucet omnibus” and “Bellum omnium contra omnes” now permits inclusion also from streak aviation in tank ar

Are you sure it's downloading same camos? We have hundreds of them, so maybe it download new ones?

Also, are you sure all WT directory are ok, not marked as read-only?

This specific track was made by independent performer. Sadly I do not have link to it.

No need to worry, it only means that players complain on you in game. As long as you are not breaking rules, nothing will happen to you.

Stop lying. You have been punished dozen times before we have decided to perma ban you from chat for constant rule breaking.

Calling someone a cheater is not the reason. I am sure you would not like me to list all the homophobic and racist comments you made.

As I have already said, the developers are preparing some news elements regarding the armour for Modern tanks in general and the Type 90 falls into that.

We do not have an ETA as they are very busy at the moment. When we have it and can, we will post it.

The report changes are spesifically on modern tank armour and linked to this, hence why we have not published them as they are dependent on this item the Devs are working on.

It's not the whole system. As we said, if was spesifically on modern tank armour and sources and dependant on this new sour

As well as normal random battles, containers with materials for the “Future Technologies” crafting event might also be obtained in the special events “TailSpin” and “Warfare 2077”.

As well as normal random battles, containers with materials for the “Future Technologies” crafting event might also be obtained in the special events “TailSpin” and “Warfare 2077”.

As well as normal random battles, containers with materials for the “Future Technologies” crafting event might also be obtained in the special events “TailSpin” and “Warfare 2077”.

Its apricated thanks. A separate topic already exists for that purpose and it has been answered several times. So there is no reason or justification for the same discussion here yet again when the answer is already available to those seeking it.

We have no sources for the F-104S showing AIM-9J.

Indeed and all of the manuals that confirm that, those aircraft have it in game.

First and foremost, this is a topic on the XM-8. You were seeking answers on that vehicle, and receive them. However its very clear now, you were not interested in that, but solely to use twist my responses to redirect the discussion to the F-104S yet again.

When you can present any F-104S source that directly links it to the AIM-9J, as we have already explained, we would welcome the suggestion. So far that

The same sources we already used on the VFM5 (that was already in game) and XM-8 family. This shell is a possible round for this family of vehicles and as such, is its current top round.

Arguing about the sources is meaningless here as the devs are already aware of the sources presented in this topic. They already had them.

Its not about finding a source to add the shell. Its down to their decision as I have already explained based on the balance of the vehicle.

USA has already had 2 top tier event vehicles in the last year:

https://warthunder.com/en/news/6808-special-operation-s-u-m-m-e-r-2020-en - F-111F

https://warthunder.com/en/news/6878-event-wargame-strategist-en - Merkava Mk 3

Not everyone can get a top tier every event.

Again, the comparison of the F-4F is not going to help this situation if that is what you are actually trying to achieve.

So lets please try to stick with the subject matter on the XM-8.

Because this is the initial configuration also taking into account relation to the VFM5. This is the intended start point for the vehicle as it enters the game. Depending on how it does and feedback on that, then the developers will review the case for new shells should they be called for.

Shells are down to the developers to decide on, that is the point. This has been the same standard since tanks were introduced. They are always decided by the developers based on where they intend to start the vehicle and what role they want it to fill. Right now, the XM-8 is where they intend i