The most accurate comment, yes.
There are way more people playing that mode than the community might think and like stated on my other comment, the new CA missions did not affect any more map creation by any shape or form.

Like everything, it's not impossible even though SP maps were designed with SP gameplay in mind. Especially the Tirailleur warstory. It's super linear and maps are really thin. They were also not built to be "balanced". This mission specifically, the attackers are at a really big disadvantage.

Looking at the map from a Design perspective I don't think Conquest would work but maybe Breakthrough could.

On the other hand. it would take way way more than just a couple of covers.

Also, there are some technical stuffs happening in single player maps compared to MP maps, like streaming of data while you play. A ton of stuff would need to be un-linked with the systems in the back that the players don't see.

Oh, my small pixelated face on reddit. Hello people.

It's important to note that the community is asking for ALL kind of things left and right. There are more people who play CA that the community might think but like I said on twitter, adding more missions was the job of one guy. We got ask for "focused competitive play" since the game launched too. It's pretty hard to please everyone but the majority of the bulk work force who can make new maps are working on new maps. It was already stated a couple of times because but making a full fledged conquest map takes months.

From what I see it's just a bit bellow. Maybe I'm hallucinating? sh*t! Halp!

Hello people, since I wrote that on Twitter because I saw a ton of comments about this specific subject... Just to clarify about the Combined Arms section of the roadmap (and only this one point) and it's impact on the production. To add more Combined Arms missions (since they were "promised") it literally took ONE single designer. This had not a single impact on the production of any more MP maps.

I, as a person, a dev and a gamer absolutely understand your concern but I'm just a small little cog in a big machine. I just wanted to clarify that little detail.

Thanks guys.

How about we do a Criterion Q&A for Firestorm next week?

Welcome to the Battlefield V Weekly Debrief - March 22nd Edition!

https://i.redd.it/06vg7n20usn21.jpg

This Week’s Highlights

• BLOGS
  • Battlefield V Quality of Life Tracker - Every week we check the sta...

Thanks for letting me know - its a new reddit/old reddit thing.

Works for folks on new reddit and on mobile app, but clearly not elsewhere.

It's a link to Dev Talks, which you can otherwise watch on Twitter

https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/1109160315302957057

^this pretty much.
The button below is just a convenient way of directly matchmaking into the content that is on show this week.

I had at one point but the someone removed it.

No idea who moderates this sub - I guess it is up to them :D

Unless the text in the Tides or War assignment specifically mentions a mode, you don't have to play the mode that is "promoted" during the active Tides of War. Meaning you can finish most of the assignments in any gamemode. Obviously, if you have to blow up an objective, that's only possible in modes that have such functionality. There is no objective to blow up in Conquest ... yet (jk).

It would actually be an even stronger argument to not split the player base with more modes, if it would melt (I assume you mean by that that it is shrinking). Rest assured nothing is melting. :)

Having that said, we see value and actual gain in time limited additions. The whole idea behind this (besides not splitting the player base too much) is to add variety every other week and really to see what relates well with the community. In the previous Battlefields we added additional gamemodes with each new set of maps, but most of those modes basically found no player base after a few weeks or even days. This way we can guarantee that players from all across the world have valid shot on playing the content that is offered and the engagement so far is extremely high through Tides of War. Some of our modes partially got played more than Conquest during certain days. That hasn't been the case ever before.

We constantly monitoring gamemode popularity and if you, the play...

Let me get back to you next week on that then. Understand the interest now, thanks for responding.

I’d need to check in with the team on this next week, but before I do help me understand your overall concern. Is it that you want the option to only play the mode solo and are worried that you will have to squad up to play it?

Forgive me! Was typing on my iPhone and finding that the user flow is a bit funky compared to Relay Pro on Android (usual app of choice! Thanks for saying so!)

Edit: Just discovered that the user flow for the iPhone Official Reddit app has Add Comment on an inbox message which doesn’t actually reply to the thread. I’ve lost the original reply in the comments here but this was in response too ‘Will Rush Come back’?

I personally expect so, though the team have only just retired it this week from its present rotation and I doubt they have had the chance yet to do a proper sit down and decide what’s next for rush. We always said that if the Mode was popular then we’d always be open to bringing it back and building on it.

There is. We will follow up on this.

Thread updated with this months Dev Talks (also available on Twitter)

We care about both and both are done by different "types" of developers. A gamemode designer or scripter can't make maps. An environment artist can't make gamemodes. We are having a pool of very talented people and we try to use all of their strengths.

I personally believe there is value in how you play as well in where you play and so far the community has reacted more than positive about Rush, Squad Conquest and the new Operation (which is technically just a gamemode). So why stop here? :)

Is George lurking somewhere out there? :D