Old School Runescape

Old School Runescape Dev Tracker




29 Feb

Comment

Originally posted by Nudelsieber

Issue in lower levels is that the bots can instantly tele.

In higher levels you get the 126 issue

The teleporting issue's circumvented at Undead Pirates via Teleblock from Elder Chaos Druids, because you're absolutely right that it is an issue!

Comment

Originally posted by Cevellini

Warpguard scroll maybe?

This sounds miles cooler than 'Blipblock', but the bar was pretty low. I like it, feels very 'fantasy'!

Comment

Originally posted by ezclap1233

“We’re not looking to bait people into the wilderness”

You sure? It seems like the entire idea is to put more pvmers in the wild who have no interest in pvping but feel obligated to do it because of the insane money/xp. The pkers then get mad when pvmers bring scout alts/insta log/etc, but the pvmer is always going to be at a disadvantage.

Another easy no vote from me. 

Read more

Totally get where you're coming from. The team's perspective is that there are alternative moneymakers outside of the Wilderness that exceed these rates (see here) that aren't going to become worse or be impacted in any significant way. Agility has better options for XP and GP, since the rates provided assume you're uninterrupted.

The question for us when designing stuff like this is, 'where so many safe alternatives exist, why would anybody take th...

Read more
Comment

Originally posted by Monterey-Jack

You made bounty hunting boosting against the rules, right? Make playing a clan for protection while you skill against the rules so clans don't take over these hotspots like they had with Rev caves. Singles doesn't mean anything if people buying gold can pay for protection while they make 5x what they paid a clan.

Absolutely something we could explore, I think in the past we've had designers say that the 'emergent' side of interactions like those are the kind of thing devs dream about, but if they're too difficult to challenge or the end results sour (i.e. RWT that we're not fully on top of) then absolutely have faith that the team would step in and make changes to ensure the content stays healthy.

Comment

Originally posted by Excellent-Employer16

Why not just make the wildy course multiply xp based on the risk you are wearing? Make it so you can’t insta logout while in the course. Could make for a ton of intense PvP scenarios. Could be cool to see someone risk 1b gear to get the best agility xp rates! I think it would be a lot more interesting than what is proposed here.

Think I replied to a tweet (presumably yours) on this, so will paste reply for wider visibility: " We've spoken a bunch in the past about systems like these and run into problems with stuff like 'what if people use never-traded items with really high values to inflate that can't really be easily shifted'. It's a technical challenge, but not off the table for future "

Comment

Originally posted by 2007Scape_HotTakes

I like the agility changes but my suggestion would be instead of skeletons: - Prevent logout for 3 seconds after you complete any agility activity. So after you cross the log, swing the rope, etc. You get a 3 second cooldown before you can logout.

This would make it similar to the blocked logout after a spell is cast at the fountain of Rune. Making things more consistent.

And I think with the insane amount of alchs available at fountain of rune that 3 seconds isn't long enough. People will be able to log before the pker running up the landing can get to them. I think 5 seconds / ticks would be a lot more reasonable for the amount of reward they're going to get.

We're absolutely open to increasing the existing delay if 3s isn't enough, but a delay much smaller than that was definitely felt at Revenants so we think it's more of a 'wait and see' scenario than overcorrecting in advance - it still has to pass a poll first!

Comment

Originally posted by Commercial-Grass-175

" Without Amylase in the mix, it's ~23 laps or ~16 minutes of running around at the speed of sound. "

Goddammit, time to go listen to Escape from the City for the 108392112 time.

Absolute swimbimbler of a tune!

Comment

Originally posted by Ironmeme420

Scrap the fountain of rune idea and wilderness agility idea while also moving the undead pirates to a better location (most likely a coast line in level 20-25 wilderness). The reason why this needs to be removed entirely is because this will add so much gold to the economy and will be botted to hell.

The whole point of the Undead Pirates is to serve as a hotspot in a lower Wilderness level to give alternative builds a place to reasonably engage with something in the Wilderness (and for players who might not be maxed to not guarantee fights with 126s over and over).

Appreciate your concerns on the other bits, we tried to go into express detail in the updated blog about how the content aims to combat bots and inflationary concerns - but we're still conscious that it won't alleviate those concerns for some, and that's totally okay!

Comment

Originally posted by orepheus

Potential different name for blip blocking scroll could be "grounding" scroll or something like that?

I don't mind it, feel like it has more associations with blocking electricity but maybe that's just ARPG affix brainrot for me...

Comment

Reminder to look after your wrists and stretch them out regularly when spending time doing near enough anything at your PC, and to play the game however you like and find fun - which includes playing efficiently!

Post
    on News - Thread - Direct
Take a look at some of the first details we have to share for the return of RuneFest in 2024!
Post
    on News - Thread - Direct
RuneScape comes to the tabletop! The RuneScape Kingdoms Board Game and Roleplaying Game, published by Steamforged Games, hit retailers around the world today!
Post
    on News - Thread - Direct
This post details all things Undead pirates and a whole host of other Wilderness changes ahead of polling!
Post
    on News - Thread - Direct
Take a look at some of the first details we have to share for the return of RuneFest in 2024!

28 Feb

Comment

Your ban is correct. The offence on your account was applied for botting at Scurrius, not for using a VPN abroad.

I would not recommend risking your account by botting such a trivial boss.

VPN usage alone does not result in a ban.

Post
    on News - Thread - Direct
We've got a handful of QoL updates for you this week!

27 Feb

Comment

Originally posted by AssassinAragorn

The agility course presents some issues with fighting back though. Agility encourages you to weigh as little as possible. Counter pking requires you to wear armor, bring weapons, and food and potions. I think if you want to make fighting back viable for the non pkers, the wildy agility course will need to ignore weight or provide a significant run energy regeneration bonus.

I think it's also worthwhile for you guys to consider what it is about Wilderness PvP that attracted pkers, and find a healthy way to recreate that. If it was just fighting other players, then maybe it would be better to give the PVP Arena more love and find good unique rewards for it. If the part those players liked though was hunting non pkers, you guys need to be really careful how you do it. History has shown the non pkers usually don't like being part of that. Finding a new way to offer that kind of gameplay might be a better approach.

Edit: I'm an idiot, I missed that part in the...

Read more

"Touching the pillar (or chest!) will also restore your Run Energy, so you can indulge in some heavier gear and fight back against anyone causing trouble – and free up some Inventory slots you would otherwise spend on Stamina Potions!" is in there, because we agree! Would rather give people the freedom to actually gear up to fight back if they'd like, and actively encourage people to actually engage rather than let themselves perish/log (likely not possible).

Agree to some extent that I think it'd be cool to find more of the 'other' stuff that's fun for veteran PKers and encourages newer PKers to get involved. That being said, there very much are still people who enjoy what the Wilderness offers even if they're not PKers, and we have been putting in work to try and decouple some of the longer-standing 'forced' talking points that are far less prevalent these days!

Comment

Originally posted by Deep-Technician5378

Maybe some clarity on mechanics within the game? What about an overlay indicator that tells us if there's a wilderness specific mechanic there?

A lot of people are just unaware, and you shouldn't have to look an area up first. It's smart to do, but that should always be reflected in gameplay.

Think it'd be cool to see if we could expand the 'overlay' offerings maybe beyond just 'Wildy Level' and 'Single/Single+/Multi', will see if the team would be willing to have a sit-down and think about feasible components for something like that!

Comment

Originally posted by Apatheticsz

Any word on pickpocket chance rework

Will be in an upcoming Project Rebalance blog sometime next month, finished writing up Thieving stuff earlier this morning funnily enough!

Comment

Originally posted by AssassinAragorn

Also worth keeping in mind that the rates in question assume you're wholly uninterrupted

Do you guys have provisions in mind to prevent a repeat of the multi revs situation? It seems like it would be way too easy for a clan to lock down the area and let players get these uninterrupted rates. And historically, that's led to an increase in RWT.

Is the thinking that it'll be difficult for a clan to do so because the whole area isn't multi? That brings up the question though of how you'll prevent this at the pirates, since those are multi.

I think relative to what multi revs was, nothing in this poll comes anywhere close to that. I'm not sure it'd be worth paying for protection at content where better alternatives exist, coupled with there being more worlds than there were at the time, Agi Course being singles, Undead Pirates being harder to 'control' because it's so open since it's above ground and because it's a low Wilderness level so it's hard for one clan to have the numbers to cover all of the potential brackets in a meaningful way, no uniques on the same 'tier' for desirability as revs weapons (since a lot of the people paying for protection back in the day were Irons looking for the GP and revs uniques).

RWT is a separate issue for ACT to tackle, and they continue to ban buyers and sellers - if protection did pop up and ultimately lead to RWT, I imagine ACT would have a field day tracking stuff down, but from a content perspective I'm not really convinced this is a good fit for prote...

Read more