devtrackers.gg
There's a huge floor in your argument.
There's a huge floor in your argument.
Let us know which questions you'd like answered on Wednesday's Q&A livestream at 5pm UK time!
Questions that provoke discussion are valued over Yes/No questions.
Thanks!
External link →/u/Mod_Curse any insights?
Laughs in eternal glory
I'm not gonna lie, you've surprised me with the reply lol. But imo, this is the best community design I've seen so far.
Yeah, that one caught my eye too. I've shown it to the team and we're going to discuss Dragonstone armour further next week.
Can confirm this has been removed.
Could we put the new g maul in the LMS chests? It's going to go unused otherwise.
The Gmaul in LMS has the 50% special attack cost by default.
🦀🦀🦀Jmods don't reply to dragon stone criticism.🦀🦀🦀
The design was discussed with the community. The three options we've offered were a response to the first one being too detailed - hence the middle and least detailed options. Do you have more specific feedback on it?
please just start over from scratch with the dragonstone armour...
How would you have it look?
All those dragonstone armors suck
I'm sorry to hear you don't like them. Can you specify why and let us know how you would have it look?
New welcome screen is terrible and doesn't make me feel like I'm playing Old School Runescape. Please don't. Also new armour does not have the Old School feel.
Can you tell us what the armour would look like if it felt Old School?
Hey Gambit, is the gmaul always lost on death even if not skulled? The 50% one in pvp not lms.
No, we made it act like a regular +1 weapon.
New welcome screen is really terrible and gives me RS3 vibes.
Can you be more specific about what you don't like?
I want this.
🦀🦀🦀 /u/Jagex_Wolf IS POWERLESS AGAINST CRABS 🦀🦀🦀
I like seafood.
Knee-jerk reaction is to flame Jagex for even more unpolled changes. Having said that, the gmaul needed a nerf. Bulwark too, but going from 18 to 0 is a little overkill. +6 or +8 would have been more appropriate, imo.
I'd be interested to know why you think +6 or +8 would be more appropriate. Why have you picked those numbers?
Unsurprisingly, PvPers are saying the change was too small rather than too large. We went with the smallest change that would still have a significant effect so we could monitor it and adjust further if needed. I think reducing it to +6 or +8 wouldn't make much of an actual difference in terms of how often a freeze catches.
🦀🦀🦀JAGEX WONT RESPOND TO THIS POST🦀🦀🦀
I see crabs, I can never resist.
So, for broad-stroking purposes, you did the equivalent of a find and replace for elf kits? Doesn't this imply that your numerous statements about it being impossible to revert all the elves were complete lies?
I don't know the technical details of how the models are implemented, but the reason we couldn't revert the new elf models is that they were made in the updated style so they didn't have "original" models that looked like the old elves.
Hi, thanks for reporting this, this has quickly been fixed and now has the correct 50 Attack and Strength requirements :).
Hopefully the upcoming BH rework will bring more life to PvP too.
did you reconsider the rune pouch change?
A lot of thought has gone into the Rune pouch and we've settled on an outcome that we think best reflects everyone's interests as much as possible.