@ABetterRed Yep! 3 days to go! See you at the finish line!
@NagyarHegemony We *could* use a new subsidiary...
@bardghost_isu @tsiades We'll go over "legit" megacorps again, later today. :)
@DrMaple24 You'd do best to write @LeJerque about that. His e-mail is in his Twitter bio.
@tsiades That's right.
@WhapXI Yes. :)
@bardghost_isu @tsiades You'd sign a contract which would allow the MegaCorp to build office branches. It's a binding document, so removing those might be difficult and lead to a military conflict.
Empires need to agree to host those branches though.
@DrMaple24 What is the question?
@WhapXI @duxaltright That is correct.
@WhapXI This is for the MegaCorp.
@tsiades In the case of the criminal megacorp, you counter with enforcers (political force). Pop jobs generated by building appropriate buildings and filling them with pops ready to take up these positions.
The MegaCorp can, of course, build buildings that boost crime further though.
@Zaddelz Fight the power! \o/
F
@DarexiR That is correct. :)
@NathanielSnow86 The tradeoff for civilian traffic along trade routes, would be a performance hit. We're not willing to do that.
@dbenndorf May he live long and prosper with our influence... :>
@ChGroschupff @Ayano_Arisugawa The 2.1 is fully GDPR compliant, so it should be available to everyone even without the shenanigans described in this thread. :)
@Arekualkhemi Just a little longer and you'll be able to see it in action yourself. Lots of these systems become much more clear once you can experience them directly. :)
@Mweh93 Just make sure you win! You wouldn't want to be a subsidiary now, would you? :>
@IriathZhul They should, yes.