Smin1080p

BR feedback is generally always focused and collected from the offical topics, hence why all of our news posts direct there. Every post is monitored and the more posts there are in agreement about a specific change, the higher the chances it will be considered. In this case, the sim changes made were the biggest ones this time.

No ETA right now.

Another gentle reminder guys, this is a video game, not a news forum or Reddit.

If you wish to discuss current world events, please do so elsewhere. A reminder of the rules:

These machines will remain exclusive for their respective store fronts as platform exclusives.

Actually came from the feedback topic this week, not rants

No current plans, however I am not the forum guru. That would be @Stona

Soon™

Ok a loooot of off topic removed.

I would remind everyone, topics such as this:

Exist for a reason.

Please keep these discussions in the correct place guys. Most of you are not new here and know how things work by now.

Since its introduction, the BR system has never omitted player statistics as that is one of the primary factors and reasons for its introduction. No vehicle in game has a BR based solely on its on paper or comparative performance to another similar vehicle. Every BR is decided independently based on the performance of that vehicle, taking into account how much its played, its line-ups and other factors.

There are many examples of comparatively (on paper) similar, better or worse vehicles being higher or lower than counterparts from other nations.

This was a vote for the economic system of the game, not the battle rating balance system of the game. The two are independent and separate.

Maus was not removed for being unhistorical.

Those not remove would create even bigger gaps than the one the Re.2006 would fill and that's not a justification to add it.

Thank you everyone that applied!

After reviewing all applications, we have selected the following candidates for Suggestion Moderation:

@Headnaught


@kleinerPanzer


@kurururocks


@yoyolast

We will reach out to the users above in the coming days detailing further steps.

Once again, thank you to all applicants and we welcome our new team members!

Germany used the AIM-9J in the USA on their F-104s. It meets the current criteria.

Cuisine Royal took back over ))

2x AIM-9J was all the German F-104 ever used according to currently available sources in a service capacity. It also better suits it's new BR of 10.3. 4 X AIM-9J would require more likely 10.7. But may be reconsidered in the coming days.

2 X AIM-9J was all that the German F-104 ever mounted at least in pictures. 2 X AIM-9J was added as German Starfighters used this loadout during training in the USA.

4 x AIM-9J may yet be reconsidered.

Feedback has already been reviewed from the initial proposals and many were implemented. We do not plan a second round of changes within this update as these are now live as planned.

Any further BR feedback will be collected and reviewed in the next BR update in the future with its own topic

On the matter of the Chi-Nu II, this vehicle saw a similar number of battles as the Panzer IV J, but with twice the efficiency of the Panzer IV. As such, this increase is planned to go ahead. On a similar note, the Panzer IV variants, both the H and J models specifically, are some of the lowest performing medium tanks within their current BR range. So a reduction in BR is a logical step to counter this.

Pilots, Tankers and captains!

Thank you for your feedback on the recently proposed BR changes. We have reviewed many of your suggestions and have an updated table of changes to share with you as well as some points relating to some specific suggested changes.

In response to the changes of strike aircraft and the removal of their air spawn, we saw your feedback concerning the perceived drop in performance some aircraft may experience. At this stage, we do not think it's necessary to make any BR changes for these aircraft until we can review the effects of the changes. However we will closely monitor these aircraft and make any necessary changes in a future BR review.

Regarding your feedback on the German F-104G on its move up to Rank VII, its BR will be increased to 10.3 in RB and a preset of 2 x AIM-9J missiles will be added, as it is possible for the aircraft to carry these weapo...

Please read the post fully before you quote and do not selectively ignore parts of it:

MB 157 has just 2 open reports, both loadout related, both down to conflicting sources. F-100D, just one, also loadout related, also in queue but currently the devs are seeking some additional info.

This and the previous post were not an invitation to carry on a discussion. You can do so here: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1267-france/

The BR system has never worked according to historical factors. Simply how the aircraft perform in game.

Some already have (Panther II, KT 105, Flak 341) others are no longer available (Bf 109 Z, J6K) and others simply don't have any current viable replacements. (R2Y)

This is your personal opinion, which you are entirely entitled too. However we are not going to remove an entire tree because of your personal opinion, which not everyone shares.

So if we could please stick to sensible feedback and not random over the top nonstarter suggestions.

Added in 2014, 5 years before the policy change.

Kikka as a whole flew. Re.2006 did not. Again added before 2019.

Feel free to submit a historical report with sources to support this claim and it can be reviewed.

Flew.

Also flew.

Every nation is impacted by prototypes that never flew and tanks that never made it before mock-up. You are comparing examples added multiple years ago long before a policy change and only a year after Italy itself was even in game.