War Thunder Dev Tracker

As I already said previously pretty close to 0%. We said in the previous but 1 Q and A., a modernized T-72 was planned for the last update but didn't quite make it. So you can expect that most likely this update. But not T-90.

From 11:00 GMT on the 7th of August

"Capture 7 points in naval battles whilst controlling a vessel or aircraft." - you need to do it in rank II+

"Destroy 3 enemies with torpedoes whilst controlling a vessel or aircraft." - you need to do it in rank II+

Because both things counts for navy, and in navy requirement is rank II or higher as we stated here:

And your last question:

Yes, it should count for both tasks if you do it on rank III+ aircraft with torpedo.

Enemy team is red

My team is blue

I saw some WWII machines

And more modern ones too.

I am sorry guys, but it's really too early for any hints.

I know, you understand it. Just amazes me others still believe its somehow "leaks" or "100% accurate".

Just to cut short this Challenger demonstrator discussion.

1) We literally just got a brand new CR 2 last update. Dont expect to see another one anytime soon

2) Both the Rheinmetall CR 2 L/55 proposed upgrade and the new 130mm test bed are far outside of the scope of the game for the foreseeable future.

So please take the discussion on them to the correct section

In other words, pick a random famous jet thats a current generation ahead of where we are in game and claim its work is "being started" so when said already likely jet comes much, much later in the future, you can claim it as a "100% accurate source prediction". Seems legit ))

We have quite literally hundreds of models in production, planned out or roadmaped for the future. Its really not hard to guess some things at this stage for what lies a...

Thank you for the feedback

In order to enter service, a vehicle should go into production first. Sounds obvious, right? Well, that’s the stage that A LOT of really interesting and promising designs failed to pass due to all sorts of reasons — while other designs not only entered production but also managed to remain relevant for decades. Today we’re going to discuss vehicles belonging to the latter category — the most produced tanks of War Thunder. The legendary T-72, the T-34, the Sherman… and many others.

We invite youtubers and streamers to cooperate and offer support depending on the quantity and popularity of your content. More information: https://warthunder.com/en/media/partnership/

The War Thunder Team

Oto kolejna seria pytań i odpowiedzi z Wiaczesławem Bułannikowem!

Lotnictwo

P. Kiedy pojawiła się aktualizacja “Starfighters”, F-104A/C rozwijające Mcha 2 regularnie spotykały się z samolotami poddźwiękowymi, takimi jak maszyny z KB 9.7. W ostatniej aktualizacji KB naprawiliście to, przesuwając je do 10.0, ale jednocześnie obniżyliście równie potężnego Lightninga F.6 do 9.7, więc teraz jest w stanie mierzyć się wyłącznie z samolotami z przedziału 8.7-9.7 i z łatwością je zdeklasować. Jaki był powód tej zmiany? Czy moglibyście to jeszcze raz przemyśleć i przesunąć go z powrotem do 10.0 tak, aby wszystkie naddźwiękowce osiągające Macha 2 znalazły się powyżej limitu 9.7?

Powód jest w obu przypadkach ten sam - statystyki i skuteczność samolotu w grze. W przypadku F-104 była on powyżej maksimum, a w przypadku Lightningu była przygnębiająco niska. Z...

05.08.2020

Aviation

Q. When the “Starfighters” update was released, the Mach 2 F-104A/C models regularly faced non-supersonic aircraft as they were BR 9.7. In the most recent BR update, you fixed this by moving them to 10.0, but at the same time lowered the equally powerful Lightning F.6 down to 9.7 so it now is able to face exclusively 8.7-9.7 aircraft and outclass them with ease. What was the reason for this change? Could you please reconsider this and move it back to 10.0 so that all Mach 2 supersonics are above the 9.7 cutoff?

The reason is in both cases the same - the statistics and efficiency of the aircraft in game. In the case of F-104, it was over the maximum and in case of Lightning it was depressingly low. The ability to reach Mach 2 (which is usually at high altitudes and isn’t useful in the battles in War Thunder) will not guarantee a c...

Dear players,

We have another round of questions and answers for you, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!

Aviation

Q. When the “Starfighters” update was released, the Mach 2 F-104A/C models regularly faced non-supersonic aircraft as they were BR 9.7. In the most recent BR update, you fixed this by moving them to 10.0, but at the same time lowered the equally powerful Lightning F.6 down to 9.7 so it now is able to face exclusively 8.7-9.7 aircraft and outclass them with ease. What was the reason for this change? Could you please reconsider this and move it back to 10.0 so that all Mach 2 supersonics are above the 9.7 cutoff?

The reason is in both cases the same - the statistics and efficiency of the aircraft in game. In the case of F-104, it was over the maximum and in case of Lightning it was depressingly low. The abi...

At no stage during any of this were anyone's pleas ignored. As I explained to you we have been forwarding everyone's feedback on the matter, but that does not mean the solution to the Technical issues suddenly magics itself up suddenly or can be solved faster as a result because people start shouting and getting rowdy at the messengers.

It has been worked on this entire time and is an ongoing effort. Nobody has said otherwise, so im not really sure where that notion came from. When I said "no news", it didnt mean Naval EC suddenly had stopped being an active development. It means there as no detailed update I could give other than that what I have already said and that its still being worked on and still has not been resolved.

The whole point of this was, given we are providing you with all in information we can at the moment on EC as well as forwarding your feedback on, regardless of the frustration on the wait ...

If you read my post that you quoted, you will see that was specifically referring to the situation at that time, and how at a point with 2 majors in quick succession and multiple events almost back to back, it wasn't a good spot for EC to be present in anyway, regardless of its technical difficulties that are still preventing it anyway. I never said it was the case anytime there was any singular event on, but yes it is always a consideration.

Its once again a case of one of my previous posts referring to one spesific instance then being applied as a blanket statement to everything. Which doesn't work as the situation changes and is not the same.

Once again. I and everyone else fully appropriate frustrations. I have been back and forth with you for some time via PMs, trying to do what I can to answer and chase the matter. But there is only so much we can do and say.

...