War Thunder Dev Tracker

You are watching The Shooting Range – a weekly show for all tankers, airmen and Captains in War Thunder.

In this episode:

Pages of History: how not to build a Thunderbolt;


Triathlon: comparing top helicopters;


Operation “Summer” — returning anew!

The War Thunder Team

Once again, as I said in your previous topic about something being "underpowered" or "overpowered", if you think its not performing correctly, then please present your evidence (sources) via a Historical report: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1950-historical-reports/

0%

Hey folks! You are watching Thunder Show - redesigned and redefined!

We will no longer limit you and ourselves to strict categories, yeah, we got rid of them! Now we’ll feature only the best videos of the week. You can find our new and simplified terms of participation at the end of this episode.

Oh and by the way - we’re expanding Thunder Show to FIVE videos per episode! As for the rest - it’s business as usual! You are watching Thunder Show, a weekly project of which you can be a part of! New episode every Friday!

More about the Thunder Show

Do you have a War Thunder video you would like to share with the world? An epic scene of heroism, a hilarious mistake or just random awesomeness? Then listen up! Every week in the Thunder Show, we pic...

If you believe something is historically incorrect and have proper evidence to back that up, then please submit a historical report: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1950-historical-reports/

Its trolling.

Im afraid its not that simple as just saying, "well this game does it, so its possible". Our devs give all the time they can to answer questions and reports as it is. Im not exactly sure what games you are referring to here, but I strongly sense the situation is not at all the same as War Thunder. We have Q and As, just not live ones regularly (has been done) because its not realistically achievable.

There is no realistic way that sort of thing could be done for War Thunder in the same sense. Its not at all just a case of "Gaijin isnt doing it". Often people dont really comprehend not just the language barrier but also the shear development scale WT has.

Regardless, this is getting off topic now.

And it is. However as I had already explained, these changes were discussed, planned and organised way before the start of the event after a comprehensive anal...

We did actually act on feedback where the stats correlated and showed it was confirmed. Air and Naval as clear examples of this, that are just constantly dismissed. Again, its about balancing the event as a whole, not one part of it.

Every game has that "gap" because Developers, designers, programmers and everything else are there to do exactly what their job title says. They dont generally have the time to go around forum topics, reviewing all the feedback, answer questions etc etc. We already pose handpicked questions to the developers in the Q and As. Those questions come from here, social media and all of our other platforms. The main issue is, every Q and A people want to keep re-asking or asking another form of a question we already answered over and over again. BRs, Economy etc. There is only so many times those questions can be answered over and over before it just becomes repetitive. Thats why we always try to g...

Not what I said if you re-read

We forward feedback as and when it comes in during the event, with then a final conclusive collection at the end too.

This is the case with every vehicle a group of people "want". Mirage, Lightning, M1A2, Apache etc etc.

Everyone has generally differing opinions on what they want and what they view as priority. We have to strike a balance, based on our large audience, feedback, nations played and a plethora of other factors.

Im not sure how we "constantly give us sub-par T-72 variants" when we have only had 2 and thats because they are the first models in the series. Russia already has lots of tanks from 9.3+ whilst other nations like France, Japan and China were further behind.

Later variants maybe but certainly not the T-90A. We didn't jump from Chieftain Mk 10 to Challenger 2 so the same is true of T-90A.

Trust me when I say the developers are well aware of how much people want any T-90 and it is coming in the future. Just not this update.

I have already confirmed several pages back that we are forwarding all feedback on and will do a full feedback review when the event is over too. Its also worth noting that almost all the feedback came before the event had even started. The changes were made as I have said based on the numbers and stats of previous events. Other changes have also been made over time much in the same way as well as the multiple tasks in previous events that were also changed based on feedback in the previous events.

This is sort of ignoring all of the Community Managers and Store Team members who are all staff, posting on the forum all the time with information from the developers. We are not all "forum mods" and are actually remembers of Gaijin giving you the information directly from the developers. The facts and contents of our responses come directly from them, thats our job to bridge that gap.

We ar...

Its not an "excuse". We already said it will come in time. The point was, its being over hyped by some as the "savior" when better T-72 variants are far more useful than the first T-90s.

Nothing we can share on these at the moment. As we said recently, bombers are not the priority for the moment. They present a lot of further issues at high ranks.

Its probable.