War Thunder

War Thunder Dev Tracker




21 Dec

Post


Ground vehicles
  • CM52 - the flag in the info card has been corrected.
  • T-80 (all versions) - a bug has been fixed which affected the acceleration dynamics.
  • WZ1001(E) LCT - a bug with a collision of the barrel with the hull’s rear has been fixed.
  • WZ1001(E) LCT - a bug has been fixed which resulted in underestimated armor penetration values equal to ZTZ99A, while featuring higher muzzle velocity (report[community.gaijin.net])
  • Puma - a bug has been fixed which resulted in the damage to the battle compartment while fire in the ammo bunker behind the turret (...
Read more
Post
    /u/ on Steam - Thread - Direct
A lil somethin somethin: You can find the details for this event on the announcement page here.

20 Dec

Comment

Its under consideration, but for the time being, received the following comment:


So whilst it will remain open, its probably more something for the longer term when such a system joints the game (however that may be).

Comment

So far you have not provided any valid material to show any evidence of any performance difference. A couple of video testimonies (that we don't accept as sources) saying it had "a better radar" is pretty meaningless. If you want to provide specific source material showing what's wrong, by how much or what its lacking, that would be something we can then use or take further.


I would also advise that being overly sarcastic and argumentative in every post isn't actually going to achieve anything or progress this matter faster or further. If you want to bring valid evidence, then we can pass that along and get that sorted.

Comment

Video testimonies have never been accepted. So I'm not sure why you would assume this would be an exception.


As I have already mentioned, the renaming of the radar has already been reported and is under review. Other than that, I'm not sure what else you are suggesting is incorrect.


Valid source material we can use can be found here:

Comment

If you have any evidence as to the specifics of exactly what is missing that should be present, then the place to report that would be here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder


This video is not sufficient evidence to be used for anything. A report is already open on the renaming of the radar to the correct variant. But it has not been confirmed yet.

Comment

ZE350=153768


ZE351=153773


ZE352=153783


ZE353=153785


ZE354=153795


ZE355=153803


ZE356=153850


ZE357=153892


ZE358=155510


ZE359=155529


ZE360=155574


ZE361=155734


ZE362=155755


ZE363=155868


ZE364=155894

F-4J upgraded to use VTAS are after BuNo 158355, but the UK used F-4J earlier than BuNo 158355.

Comment

A photo or recording of some kind would be appreciated please. The report appears empty.

Comment

British F-4J(UK)s did not retain the helmet and reverted to British helmets. F-4J upgraded to use VTAS are after BuNo 158355, but the UK used F-4J earlier than BuNo 158355.


In future, please use the PM feature to ask a simple question like this, or use an existing topic rather than starting random addtional topics for a single matter.

Comment

Might be a console only issue. A report would be appreciated thanks so we can get it to the devs

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder



Im really not sure what this has to do with the Tornado?

Comment

Any more details please?


Seem to be ok for me:

Comment

Drop tanks will be expanded upon in future patches too. Other variants of vehicles that just received them may also be in line to.

Comment

Contains fabricated loadouts.

Comment

So what can we do about that?


We use the best material possible that's publicly available. Claiming somethings wrong but then being unable to provide any evidence for it because "its secret" means we cant do much with that.


If people wish to report valid issues with avalable material, we will always act on that. But we can do nothing with vague statements.

Comment

Its not going to change rank. Its at its intended rank. As always with BRs, they can change depending on how the vehicle performs in game. Not by asking me.

Comment

Hi guys.


This matter has since been resolved. It was erroneously added as a separate upgrade module but has since been fixed. If you have not yet received a refund of any GE spent on it, please contact support: https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/categories/200005031-War-Thunder

Comment

So far there's one report and nothing evidence / source wise being posted in this thread to show much is wrong.


We fully appriecate there may be issues, but so far nothing has been provided to show anything is massively wrong and nowhere near the "30/40" reports you claim that are wrong with the machine.


Any reports will be dealt with, but lets please keep things realistic and not blown out of proportion when talking about things. It doesn't help anyone.

Comment

All the things in game that get them because they could generally are things we are certain that they could. Right now that's not the case for Tornado and wing mounted Paveways.