War Thunder Dev Tracker

Well a replay / clip for example of the situation where a 1.8km shot in combination with Sarin's source would be a perfect example of a complete bug report for investigation.

Regenerative steering in its basic form was implemented some time ago. At least a general simulation of the effects it has. Where possible, further improvements will be made.

But like everything, there are limitations to what can be done in game and how something can be replicated in game. Such as the Hydrogas suspension defectiveness claims.

That doesnt really change the point, not every tank is a T-34 and each is unique based on its own characteristics as far as can be replicated in a game setting.

Lots of rounds in game can do this. Its not about simply comparing them to .50cals and saying "how cant they do this?". With a good aim, 50.cals are more than capable of reaching that range. But the Swedish MG is a higher caliber. Every round in game has its own ballistics. The core composition of the 13.2mm is different to a .50cal also accounting for the damage.

Some feedback from the devs on the feedback so far

We are working on improving server stability and overcoming lots of the issues happening recently. We understand frustrations and hope to have a proper resolution to the issues.

Both

The GR.1 used in sidewinder trails in Germany was not a spesific variant and had no specific designation. It was simply an early GR.1 before many of the upgrades more typical and standard on GR.1a came into effect. The GR.1 we have in game accurately represents an early GR.1 variant up to the point where sidewinders were trialed. This is because we plan to introduce later variants of Jaguar and making them all basically identical serves no purpose. As such, what we currently have is both correct and historical for a GR.1. Indeed whilst it was not typical for all GR.1s t...

Just before conclusions are jumped too, I also mean in general long term too. Not specifically the next update.

The WW2 content is not stopping anytime soon thats for sure.

We have some more plans indeed for that area

Squadron Vehicles in the Russian translation I believe.

For those that should have it, they will receive it when the feature is ready if/when its implemented on future vehicles.

When we have some news to share on them, it would generally be via a dev blog. Right now there is nothing new we can say.

Then there is far more likely another factor in play here that needs to be confirmed. Different standards of shell calculation are not applied to different nations. They all follow the same system.

It was, as I already explained a lighthearted joke. Quite how that somehow translates into us being directly aware of an issue and deciding just not to fix it I dont know.

Im afraid its just not the case actually. We closely monitor the statistics of every weapon in game. The stats of Swedish MGs are not dissimilar from other similar caliber weaponry.

I would recommend reporting it as a historical issue here https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/1957-weapons-and-ordnance/

How may I ask is it "obvious" we are aware of it?

Its not only about raw fixes alone, but also the quality of life improvements and changes. Of which, there were indeed more.

The developers are aware of the communities concerns in these areas.

Spawn areas and map terrain on several locations has already been adjusted to prevent spawn-spawn shooting and the remaining ones as we have already said are planned to be investigated also.

Bombers very much do have a role and many of them continue to be the most played and used aircraft. The recent changes to remove airfield destruction were done based on the feedback of the community as a whole. Bombers being able to end games via base destruction was not popular for the whole community. There are also other ways bombers can be deployed and contribute towards a victory and we will continue to monitor the situation for them as well as any feedback and suggested changes that the whole community can agree on as a positive. Air RB for example over the past 2 patchs has seen a number of improvements that came from a previous roundup of community fee...

We listen to all feedback. Nothing selective about it.

There is a big difference between something that takes time, investigation and further review than just simple "quick fixes".

Lots of changes are made across the board, some without bug reports, so trying to justify every change with whatever singular source we list on the patchnotes is logical. We cant list every source used for every change because the changelog would then become enormous.

Where did i say this?

Please do not just twist the context of my words to suit whatever situation you can link it too. Each case is different and every matter thats properly reported will be reviewed and where it is proven correct, will be actioned. Not to mention, it has quite literally no relation or connection to "money" at all. Creating links where there are none are rathe...

1) Once again, nobody was insulted or made fun of. Please do not make such clearly false accusations.

2) That is your personal opinion. I would remind you that this is a video game and realism is at its core as far as possible. But of course there have to be compromises for the sake of gameplay and balance. If you have things you would like to see changed or improved, we have a suggestions area where you can post your proposals and allow the community to vote on them. If you think you have found legitimate issues, then please bring them with your evidence to the bug reports section. Otherwise, this has no relation to this topic at all.

3) The majority of the player-base dont agree or share the same sentiment that this is an issue. We of course will always investigate legitimate community concerns, but there is nothing of substance in this topic so far for anyone to investigate. Its a personal opinion with no eviden...

Theres no "victim mentality" here. Major updates have always been filled with thousands of fixes that go totally unrecognized.

Im simply stating the facts. We have thousands of fixes every major that go totally ignored. Thats clearly evidenced here when we have major content updates with lots of fixes, followed closely by a smaller update with lots of fixes and then a further major update with lots of quality of life changes and improvements. There is always going to be that follow on of "ok but what about this". No matter what we do thats never going to stop.

The issue is everyone has different things they consider priority and important without seeing the full perspective as a whole.

Often its just assumed everything is "easy" to fix without considering the fuller and wider implications and factors.

Nobody is expecting to receive anyone as a "s...

Which is quite interesting. Because when we have the larger patches (from a pure vehicle count perspective) we have the exact opposite claims that there is too much content, too many issues and not enough fixes. "less content Gaijin, more fixes!"

Yet when we have a patch with fewer vehicles, but more quality of life fixes and improvements, lots of bug fixes and general positive changes across the game, the comments become about how "disappointing" or "boring" it is. "More content Gaijin, not enough!"

One thing is said one time, then the complete opposite the next

Ah yes, how dare we be human beings and make a lighthearted joke every now and again?

Because of that, the game is somehow dead (75,000 people in game as we speak) and we should shut it down?

Nobody is making fun of anyone here. There is nothing of substance here we can "focus on" to "make the game better".

Please, lets be serious here. If there was something serious of concern here for anyone, then to intestate, proper evidence, clips, replays and files should have been provided in a bug report so that the issue can be properly analysed and reviewed / tested.

Instead, we have a topic with no evidence, personal bias and then false claims from you that we somehow artificially buff things because its new. Once again, a totally unbacked claim.

I would say im shocked this is up to 21 pages already somehow, but then again...

This is why nobody messed with the Swedes ))

"ocena punktowa" gracza która widniała na turniejach Masz na myśli system ELO używany w uwaga, słowo klucz - turniejach?

Już gdzieś ktoś o tym wspominał, więc pewnie jest zgłoszone. Aczkolwiek nie mam 100% pewności.