War Thunder Dev Tracker

This is Tank Versus! The most entertaining, most action-packed and the most spectacular show about which tank is stronger!

The fearsome Panzerkampfwagen III: the variant with an improved gun and the highly advanced Soviet T-50, designed to rival or even surpass the tank that it faces today!

Previously on Tank Versus:

M1A2 Abrams vs. ZTZ99-III


Breda 501 vs. 8.8 FLAK 37


BT-5 vs. A13 Mk.1


M60A2 vs. Leopard 1A5


MBT-70 vs Khrizantema

We invite youtubers and streamers to cooperate and offer support depending on the quantity and popularity of your content. More information: ...

For the whole month, you will have 8 tasks available to you one by one. Completion of each task will award you with a trophy containing a reward, while completing all tasks will award you with a unique in-game player icon.

A detailed description of the current task as well as your overall progress can be found by clicking on your nickname → Achievements → Pages of History

A fighter ace who fought in WWII against Japan in the US volunteer group, the Flying Tigers, where he was a flight leader. Later he joined the US Marine Corps, where he was nicknamed "Pappy" on account of his age (he was 30). In two years Boyington downed 26 enemy planes, but was shot down in early 1944, and spent the rest of the war in captivity.

Gregory Boyington

...

A final decision has not been made yet on the vehicle.

This has absolutely nothing to do with this topic. Please don't necro an already closed and answered off topic discussion, to just start another off topic one.

You have been round long enough to know how this thread and forum work, and where to submit reports or questions.

As far as I'm aware, its never been the case for a missile to have so far been removed from an aircraft thus far to artificially lower its BR. Again, if its efficiency drops after the changes has taken place, consideration will then be given to the options available.

Dear players and Fine Arts experts!

A new month has arrived, so it's time to proclaim the winners of our last month's Community competitions! As always, a lot of effort has been put into the content that was created, and the winners will be happy to receive their share of the prize fund totalling more than 4 500 Golden Eagles!

Interested in joining any of the competitions below yourself? Then don't waste any time and visit the forums for more information!

Artistic

Screenshot - 1 500

Creator:
Gladem

Straight

Screenshot - 1 500

Creator:
Caff_Gunner

...

If the changes result in any noticeable and meaningful differences in its performance efficiency wise, it will be checked out in the next BR pass. The change hasn't even taken place yet.

Our volunteer moderators are not incompetent, and in fact dedicate a huge amount of time and effort into answering and responding both to posts and questions regarding reports. The issue is the sources you in fact provide sometimes are not "primary sources" and are sometimes not even valid sources at all. Most are Wikipedia or 3rd party website based.

This has also been explained to you several times over private messages.

I would strongly recommend you also re-read the forum rules:

Spesifically:

Such matters should be raised via PM if you have issues. It has nothing at all to do with this topic and will not be discussed here.

Multiple nations have this feature. Not just Russia.

If you wish to provide further proof and evidence (so far you have not submitted evidence, just "Russian bias"), then please do so here: https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder

The report was sent, reviewed and then an answer given. If enough evidence does not yet exist, then its open to further information and sources that could still lead to a change if they are located.

But i'm afraid I and anyone else cant do anything with the "Russian Bias" claims and constant off topic here. Its been answered and discussed enough now.

I have already answered this. All of the sources have been analysed. This does not state the modern optical tracking and is not the same system found on the vehicles that have the feature in game.

This has been answered and concluded already some time ago. If you wish to submit new information in a new report, please do. But a discussion here isn't going to change anything.

Most of those 100 pages is people going entirely on off topic tangents and discussions that should have been elsewhere on the forum in more appropriate threads. Its not our duty to provide content to keep this thread alive and afloat. We have a whole forum outside of this topic that can be used and utilized for 90% of the things that fill these 100 pages. If there is nothing to discus or content to talk about in the meantime, simply use other topics.

Blogs will come when they are ready to do so and when our schedule comes to life. We are not responsible for any self created hype or disappointment people have generated themselves without anything from us to cause that.

The only thing not really working is people not using the correct threads

I will reiterate what I said above:

I have an idea yes. But you will have to stay tuned and find out

We haven't even started with blogs yet. So not the warmest right now )

Its not the same or as advanced as found on the later vehicles. The SAAB UTAS has independent stabilization of the sight and automatic calculation of lead depending on the range to the target and speed of tracking target. Most modern MBTs have this rudimental sight stabilization same system, but we don't have that in game yet. Its not as accurate or as effective as optical tracking sensors.

The system on the PUMA, 2S38 and others is more advanced and uses more modern systems, providing direct optical tracking computing. The two systems are not the same and there have been no sources provided so far that states the SAAB UTAS sight has an optical tracking feature.

We are still searching for more information, but thus far everything is pointing towards the fact the CV 90s did not have the feature.